000-137 real questions | Pass4sure 000-137 real questions |

Pass4sure 000-137 dumps | 000-137 actual questions |

000-137 Advanced Rational Application Developer v7

Study lead Prepared by IBM Dumps Experts 000-137 Dumps and actual Questions

100% actual Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with towering Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

000-137 exam Dumps Source : Advanced Rational Application Developer v7

Test Code : 000-137
Test name : Advanced Rational Application Developer v7
Vendor name : IBM
real questions : 60 actual Questions

where am i able to find commemorate lead for exact information of 000-137 exam?
I prepared the 000-137 exam with the assist of IBM test guidance material. It turned into complex but benchmark very useful in passing my 000-137 exam.

am i able to locate actual test questions Q & A today's 000-137 exam?
Hey gentlemen I handed my 000-137 exam utilising brain sell off test lead in handiest 20 days of preparation. The dumps completely modified my lifestyles once I shelling out them. Presently I am worked in a first rate organisation with a respectable earnings. Thanks to and the entire team of the trutrainers. Troublesome issues are efficaciously secured via them. Likewise they deliver superb reference that is useful for the study reason. I solved almost sum questions in only 225 minutes.

real exam questions of 000-137 exam! Awesome Source.
I am ranked very excessive amongst my magnificence associates at the listing of awesome students but it handiest came about after I registered on this for some exam help. It become the excessive ranking studying application on this that helped me in becoming a member of the excessive ranks along with different high-quality college students of my magnificence. The sources on this are commendable because theyre particular and extraordinarily profitable for education thru 000-137, 000-137 dumps and 000-137 books. I am satisfied to apportion in writing these words of appreciation because this merits it. Thank you.

up to date and trustworthy brain dumps latest 000-137 are available here.
typical influence changed into superb however i failed in a solitary assignment but succeeded in 000-137 2nd undertaking with team very fast. exam simulator is good.

i'm very satisfied with this 000-137 examine manual.
With handiest two weeks to transport for my 000-137 exam, I felt so helpless considering my immoral training. However, had to skip the test badly as I preferred to exchange my project. Finally, i organize the question and retort through manner which removed my problems. The questions and answers of the manual changed into affluent and particular. The clean and brief answers helped design out the subjects without problems. Wonderful manual, killexams. Additionally took inspirit from 000-137 dependable Cert lead and it helped.

Can I regain latest dumps with actual Q & A of 000-137 exam?
I in no way thought I may want to pass the 000-137 exam. But I am a hundred% sure that with out I Have now not completed it thoroughly. The astonishing actual questions material gives me the required functionality to entrap the exam. Being acquainted with the provided material I passed my exam with 92%. I never scored this a respectable deal label in any exam. It is rightly conception out, efficacious and dependable to use. Thanks for presenting a dynamic material for the getting to know.

i've placed a terrific source simultaneous 000-137 material.
Overall print was very respectable but i failed in one assignment but succeeded in 000-137 second assignment with team very fast. exam simulator is good.

Questions were exactly identical as i purchased!
I ought to recognize that your answers and factors to the questions are superb. those helped me comprehend the fundamentals and thereby helped me strive the questions which Have been now not direct. I should Have handed without your questions and answers, however your question bank and remaining day revision set were truly helpful. I had anticipated a marks of 90+, but though scored eighty three.50%. thanks.

simply study these present day dumps and achievement is yours. 000-137 braindump works. sum questions are privilege and the solutions are correct. its miles well worth the cash. I passed my 000-137 exam remaining week.

what number of days required for 000-137 training?
It was the time whilst i used to exist scanning for the net exam simulator, to entrap my 000-137 exam. I solved sum questions in only 90 minutes. It was terrific to recognise that Questions & solutions had sum vital material that become wished for the exam. The material of changed into powerful to the point that I passed my exam. while i used to exist told about Questions & answers via one in sum my partners, i was hesitant to utilize it so I chose to down load the demos first of all, and check whether or not i can regain privilege inspirit for the 000-137 exam.

IBM Advanced Rational Application Developer

IBM certified advanced software Developer | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

This seller-specific Certification is obtainable with the aid of:IBM CorporationArmonk, the immense apple USAPhone: 914-499-1900Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You want JavaScript enabled to view it.

ability degree: superior                          reputation: active

low cost: $200 (shortest music)               

summary:For advanced builders who Have huge journey constructing enterprise purposes. There are two tracks to elect between: Rational utility Developer (v. 7) and Lotus Notes and Domino (eight, 8.5).

initial necessities:For the Rational software Developer tack, you ought to rush one examination ($200).For the Lotus Notes and Domino tune, you necessity to exist an IBM licensed application Developer - Lotus Notes and Domino (for the version you wish to become certificed in) and circulate between one and two additional checks ($200 each). practicing is accessible but now not required.

continuing requirements:None distinctive

Pay Chart:

See sum Ibm Certifications

dealer's web page for this certification

Sharing facts Between Operations and construction end of fresh IBM equipment | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps


Sharing records Between Operations and evolution end of recent IBM tools IBM is shipping two fresh toolkits that merge technologies from two of its middleware businesses – Rational and Tivoli – to support builders and operators diagnose issues in construction code whereas it’s working.

“IBM software can now measure precise-time performance of an software in production, establish defects in the meanwhile they occur, and ship key information lower back to development, enabling the developer to diagnose the actual vicinity of code defects and efficiency bottlenecks,” IBM stated in a statement. The conception is to allow “both operations and evolution teams to Have a common view of the difficulty, assisting groups gain the holistic, end-to-conclusion view that's primary to IT lifecycle administration.”

The announcement came on the Rational application pile conference this week in Las Vegas. It illustrates the kinds of synergies IBM is gaining from its acquisition of Rational software simply over two years in the past.

the two fresh toolkits are dubbed the IBM problem resolution Toolkit for Rational utility Developer and IBM performance Optimization Toolkit for Rational efficiency Tester.

the two fresh offerings merge capabilities of Rational’s evolution and testing tools with Tivoli’s application management application. “development teams that design, build and examine applications and the IT operations staffs that race them can [now] share previously siloed assistance about their efficiency,” in line with IBM’s remark.

The IBM problem conclusion Toolkit for IBM Rational software Developer for WebSphere utility extends IBM Rational utility Developer and IBM Rational software Architect, featuring tools for viewing and analyzing creation facts. It maps transaction efficiency statistics accrued in construction with the aid of IBM Tivoli Monitoring for Transaction performance onto the underlying code.

meanwhile, IBM performance Optimization Toolkit for IBM Rational performance Tester offers testers with utility monitoring capabilities of J2EE purposes sum over load trying out with Rational efficiency Tester. “The toolkit makes it feasible for the efficiency tester to collect, analyze, segregate and doc performance hint facts,” says IBM’s observation.

The Tivoli tool monitors efficiency of a live application, tracing and storing particulars of performance or first-rate considerations. The IBM rigor resolution Toolkit enables the developer to entry the kept guidance with the end to segregate the intuition behind the rigor down to the supply code.

IBM performance Optimization Toolkit uses statistics collectors in line with Tivoli utility during the software checking out technique. When a problem is recognized in the ascertain at various lab, the toolkit makes exhaust of Tivoli's “autonomic” capabilities to hint probably motives and resolutions. If the probably trigger is linked to the utility source code, the recorded counsel can then exist passed over to the software’s developers.

IBM Rational utility Developer prices $four,000 per consumer, whereas IBM Rational performance Tester costs $1,500 per user. both toolkits are free to purchasers who've a current maintenance contract.

The tools race on windows Server 2003, both ordinary and enterprise variants, and on home windows 2000 (carrier pack 3 or four) knowledgeable, Server and advanced Server. moreover, they race on home windows XP (carrier Pack 1 or 2).

in regards to the writer

Stuart J. Johnston has lined expertise, exceptionally Microsoft, in view that February 1988 for InfoWorld, Computerworld, information Week, and notebook World, in addition to for industry Developer, XML & internet services, and .web magazines.

file: IBM Outpaces competitors in software construction software marketplace for Seventh Straight year | actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

supply: IBM

June 13, 2008 08:00 ET

ARMONK, immense apple--(Marketwire - June 13, 2008) - IBM (NYSE: IBM) these days introduced that analyst company Gartner, Inc.* and market research company Evans information Corp. Have ranked IBM because the chief within the software pile utility market. These rankings reach simply as IBM is projecting more than 12,000 americans will attend its 2008 IBM Rational utility pile Conferences in 13 nations sum over the world.

Gartner named IBM the global market share chief in software evolution according to complete utility earnings in 2007 and Evans information Corp. survey respondents who Have been users of IBM Rational application Developer ranked it the number 1 built-in Developer ambiance (IDE) for person pride. here's the seventh consecutive 12 months that Gartner has ranked IBM the chief and 2nd consecutive year that IBM Rational utility Developer turned into selected because the Developer's option proper IDE by using the 1,200 builders worldwide collaborating in the survey.

in line with the independent Gartner report, IBM is the main market share vendor in complete application earnings, with 37.eight p.c market share -- better market share than its three closest rivals mixed. The international utility pile software market grew more than 10% % in 2007 to just about $6.9 billion, in response to Gartner.

IBM became furthermore cited for its tolerable leadership in response to complete utility profits for 2007 throughout utility pile market sub-classes, together with SCCM allotted, expostulate Oriented evaluation & Design and Java Platform ad tool. Telelogic, recently got through IBM, had a 2007 marketshare of forty.6 percent within the necessities Elicitation and administration category in line with total software revenue.

"With the upward shove of worldwide allotted application construction teams, consumers are trying to find skilled providers to support them collaborate in an open and lucid manner," pointed out Dr. Daniel Sabbah, established manager, IBM Rational software. "We conform with the wonderful response from the Evans information and Gartner studies coincides with the remarks we've got acquired from purchasers about IBM's way round constructive application delivery."

IBM Kicks off the area's Most Attended Developer conference collection

This marketshare information coincides with IBM's announcement that over 12,000 members are expected to attend the 15 IBM Rational application evolution Conferences deliberate everywhere. Following the undergo held ultimate week in Orlando, FL, IBM will entrap the demonstrate on the road to 17 cities including Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt; San Paulo, Brazil; Bangalore, India; Shanghai, China; Rome and Milan, Italy.

For conference attendees the exhaust of an iPhone, IBM is releasing a convention scheduler written in commercial enterprise technology Language (EGL) to permit iPhone users to dynamically undergo the IBM Rational software evolution conference via an interface that they suppose comfy with. using net 2.0 and convivial engineering ideas, users can provide comments on and chat about periods, navigate the conference looking for tracks and hobbies, and exhaust inventive technology that means which talks the user may noiseless attend next in line with preferences.

at the annual IBM Rational software construction convention in Orlando, Florida, greater than 3,500 attendees discovered about fresh utility and courses that aid purchasers transform how they're nascence application on a worldwide scale. The announcement of recent items, capabilities and industry companion initiatives are designed to transform how IBM Rational utility can aid purchasers force better expense and efficiency from their globally allotted software investments.

clients unable to attend the convention in the neighborhood can view the keynote presentations on IBM television.

IBM helps developers stay aggressive in cutting-edge speedy-paced construction environment. creative courses reminiscent of IBM developerWorks, the premier technical resource for software developers, and IBM alphaWorks, IBM's rising technologies outlet, provide an online community for the developers of today and the following day. builders who're impartial software carriers can entrap handicap of income and advertising tools, ability-constructing courses and technical assist with the aid of becoming a member of the international IBM PartnerWorld application. IBM's educational Initiative and IBM Rational utility construction conference are examples of the continued getting to know and group-building classes crucial via students, educators and developers international.

For greater suggestions, talk over with

*"Market Share: application pile application, global, 2007" by means of Laurie Wurster, Teresa Jones and Asheesh Raina, might furthermore 2008.

Obviously it is difficult assignment to pick solid certification questions/answers assets concerning review, reputation and validity since individuals regain sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report objection customers reach to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effectively. They never trade off on their review, reputation and quality because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer conviction is vital to us. Uniquely they deal with review, reputation, sham report grievance, trust, validity, report and scam. In the event that you contemplate any improper report posted by their rivals with the name killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, dissension or something fancy this, simply recollect there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of respectable administrations because of their advantages. There are a worthy many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Brain dumps Menu

920-167 questions and answers | P2090-054 cheat sheets | 1Z0-900 sample test | CVA bootcamp | 000-M68 test prep | 646-656 cram | HP0-S12 free pdf | 642-741 exercise questions | C2050-241 mock exam | CNOR VCE | GB0-183 test questions | C9010-252 dump | HP0-D20 dumps questions | 1Z0-545 actual questions | CUR-008 questions and answers | 000-765 braindumps | C9560-505 exam prep | 9A0-062 exercise questions | 1D0-61C actual questions | C4040-224 exercise test |

Just memorize these 000-137 questions before you evaporate for test. 000-137 Exam PDF comprises of Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Dumps checked and affirmed alongside references and clarifications (where applicable). Their objective to accumulate the Questions and Answers isnt in every case just to pass the exam at the first attempt yet Really improve Your information about the 000-137 exam subjects.

Once you suffer their Questions and Answers, you will feel assured regarding sum the topics of exam and feel that your information has been greatly improved. These actal test Questions and Answers are not simply exercise questions, these are actual test Questions and Answers that are enough to pass the 000-137 exam first attempt. Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for sum exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders larger than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for sum Orders

We Have their specialists working persistently for the accumulation of actual exam questions of 000-137. sum the pass4sure questions and answers of 000-137 collected by their group are explored and updated by their IBM ensured group. They stay associated with the applicants showed up in the 000-137 test to regain their audits about the 000-137 test, they gather 000-137 exam tips and traps, their undergo about the procedures utilized in the actual 000-137 exam, the slip-ups they done in the actual test and after that enhance their material in fancy manner. When you undergo their pass4sure questions and answers, you will feel sure about every one of the points of test and feel that your insight has been incredibly made strides. These pass4sure questions and answers are not simply exercise questions, these are actual exam questions and answers that are enough to pass the 000-137 exam at first attempt.

IBM certifications are exceptionally required crosswise over IT associations. HR directors bias toward applicants who Have a comprehension of the theme, as well as having finished certification exams in the subject. sum the IBM certifications gave on Pass4sure are acknowledged worldwide.

It is safe to utter that you are searching for pass4sure actual exams questions and answers for the Advanced Rational Application Developer v7 exam? They are here to give you one most updated and quality sources is They Have accumulated a database of questions from actual exams keeping thinking the halt goal to give you a casual to regain ready and pass 000-137 exam on the first attempt. sum preparation materials on the site are up and coming and certified by industry experts.

Why is the Ultimate conclusion for certification readiness?

1. A quality item that inspirit You Prepare for Your Exam: is a definitive readiness hotspot for passing the IBM 000-137 exam. They Have painstakingly gone along and collected actual exam questions and answers, updated with indistinguishable recurrence from actual exam is updated, and verified on by industry specialists. Their IBM ensured specialists from numerous associations are skilled and qualified/certified people who Have explored each question and retort and clarification segment to enable you to comprehend the conception and pass the IBM exam. The most benchmark approach to contrivance 000-137 exam isn't perusing a course reading, yet taking exercise actual questions and understanding the privilege answers. exercise questions inspirit set you up for the ideas, as well As the strategy in questions and retort choices are exhibited amid the actual exam.

2. facile to understand Mobile Device Access: give to a worthy degree facile to exhaust access to items. The focal point of the site is to give precise, updated, and to the lead material toward enable you to study and pass the 000-137 exam. You can rapidly find the actual questions and solution database. The website is multifarious well disposed to permit examine anyplace, as long as you Have web association. You can simply stack the PDF in multifarious and examine anyplace.

3. Access the Most Recent Advanced Rational Application Developer v7 actual Questions and Answers:

Our Exam databases are consistently updated during the time to incorporate the latest actual questions and answers from the IBM 000-137 exam. Having Accurate, legitimate and current actual exam questions, you will pass your exam on the first attempt!

4. Their Materials is Verified by Industry Experts:

We are doing battle to giving you exact Advanced Rational Application Developer v7 exam questions and answers, alongside clarifications. They design the estimation of your opening and cash, the intuition each question and retort on has been verified by IBM certified specialists. They are exceedingly qualified and ensured people, who Have numerous long stretches of expert undergo identified with the IBM exams.

5. They Provide sum Exam Questions and comprehend particular Answers with Explanations: Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for sum exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for sum Orders

Dissimilar to numerous other exam prep sites, gives updated actual IBM 000-137 exam questions, as well as point by point answers, clarifications and graphs. This is vital to inspirit the applicant comprehend the privilege answer, as well as insights about the choices that were wrong.

000-137 Practice Test | 000-137 examcollection | 000-137 VCE | 000-137 study guide | 000-137 practice exam | 000-137 cram

Killexams M2035-725 exercise Test | Killexams OG0-9AB exam questions | Killexams HP0-J43 questions answers | Killexams 310-066 exercise test | Killexams EVP-101 questions and answers | Killexams 400-201 free pdf | Killexams HP2-E42 mock exam | Killexams 1Z0-987 bootcamp | Killexams BCB-Analyst braindumps | Killexams 644-066 questions and answers | Killexams 1Z0-448 cram | Killexams HP0-T01 study guide | Killexams HP3-X11 actual questions | Killexams 000-051 exercise test | Killexams P2090-068 study guide | Killexams P2020-079 brain dumps | Killexams 920-167 actual questions | Killexams 1Z0-108 pdf download | Killexams FC0-U51 sample test | Killexams 117-202 dump |

Exam Simulator : Pass4sure 000-137 VCE Exam Simulator

View Complete list of Brain dumps

Killexams CNSC VCE | Killexams HP2-H13 braindumps | Killexams 000-083 dumps | Killexams HP0-876 dumps questions | Killexams M2040-724 free pdf | Killexams 646-393 actual questions | Killexams ISSEP exercise Test | Killexams EX0-115 study guide | Killexams 920-482 questions and answers | Killexams C4040-129 brain dumps | Killexams RH-202 study guide | Killexams C2140-058 exam prep | Killexams HP0-A100 free pdf | Killexams A2180-188 actual questions | Killexams HP2-E34 exercise test | Killexams EX0-118 braindumps | Killexams 650-987 sample test | Killexams 000-220 exam prep | Killexams JN0-696 questions and answers | Killexams HP0-D13 test prep |

Advanced Rational Application Developer v7

Pass 4 sure 000-137 dumps | 000-137 actual questions |

Mainframe conversion to Web services | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

IBM offers an extensive set of tools for Web-service conversion.

Mainframe Tools: IBM Software Configuration Library Manager Advanced Edition for z/OS provides overall configuration management across Java and mainframe-language (e.g., COBOL) code libraries. IBM Enterprise COBOL for z/OS allows evolution of COBOL programs that integrate effectively with Java code in a Web service, including XML support and WebSphere Application Server interoperability support. IBM IMS allows its transactions to exist published as Web services, and provides Integrated Connect to connect between IMS and typical Web-service application environments such as Linux.

IBM Debug tool for z/OS and IBM Debug tool Utilities and Advanced Functions for z/OS offers a solitary debugging tool for CICS, DB2, IMS, and batch applications written in COBOL, PL/1, C, C++, and IBM assembler. It can exist used in concert with WebSphere Developer for zSeries to ensure that Web service provider code and existing mainframe application code labor in harmony. File Manager helps Web-service converters to fix data problems and create test cases.

IBM Application Performance Analyzer for z/OS monitors and analyzes the runtime performance of CICS, PL/1, COBOL, DB2, IMS, and assembler-based mainframe applications, including Web services. IBM failing Analyzer for z/OS allows users to determine why these applications fail. IBM CICS Transaction Server provides features to extend CICS applications to race in an SOA environment. IBM CICS Performance Analyzer for z/OS creates reports analyzing CICS application performance and performing problem determination and capacity planning.

Rational and WebSphere tools and platforms: IBM offers a set of mainframe software design and construction tools (under both the Rational and WebSphere brands) based on the Eclipse open source framework, which provides standards-based flexibility and third-party tool integration IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere Software includes rapid-development capabilities for Web, Java, XML, and Web services developers. It furthermore has J2EE support, UML visualization, and portal development, as well as developer testing tools and a bundled license to Rational ClearCase LT for team collaboration.

Using the UML Profiles for industry Modeling and Software Services, architects can open a industry process model, transform it to UML, model the application, and then transform it into Web service specifications for developers to code.

IBM Rational Software Architect (RSA) builds on Rational Application Developer by adding replete UML 2.0 modeling, Pattern/Transform Authoring, a Reusable Asset Browser, support for UML Language Transforms, Structural Review & Control, and C/C++ evolution Tools.

WebSphere Developer for zSeries (WDz) adds to Rational Application Developer mainframe-development and existing-application-upgrade functionality that allows users to prepare typical existing/legacy software for inclusion in composite applications that integrate industry processes effectively. WDz furthermore includes Enterprise Generation Language support (i.e., a utility to enable business-oriented procedural developers who may not know Java to develop, test, and debug data-driven Web applications, Web services, and industry logic using procedural programming constructs), and can generate Java or COBOL code, depending on the deployment platform. WDz furthermore includes support for web services and JCA connectivity to multiple versions of CICS and IMS, as well as visual modeling and flow-generation support for the CICS V3 Service rush Feature.

IBM WebSphere Integration Developer (WID) adds workflow and industry integration functionality to allow creation of fresh composite applications that integration with existing application functions and Web services. WID includes endemic support for WS-BPEL4WS-compliant processes and a achieve of process integration and ESB capabilities. WebSphere industry Modeler gives the industry analyst tools for business-process modeling, and can rush data into WID and RSA. IBM Rational furthermore provides tools for requirements analysis, testing, change and configuration management, and project/process management.

Users may employ IBM WebSphere software-infrastructure components and especially IBM WebSphere Application Server, IBM WebSphere Portal, and the IBM DB2 database as a "framework" for software built with tools such as WDz or RAD. IBM furthermore provides support for Apache Tomcat and BEA WebLogic as well as JDBC access to other major favorite databases.

The Eclipse initiative specifically supports substituting or adding third-party evolution tools to IBM's tools and framework. IBM's service arm focuses on "on-demand" computing and providing efficacious e-business solutions, including Web services. IBM WebSphere Application Server for z/OS (WASz) is a strategic platform on which to race industry applications and processes. It provides core application support capabilities for vertical/functional ISVs by allowing them to carry out application-server tasks across J2EE and mainframe services (including those on CICS, IMS, and TPF platforms). By integrating converted mainframe applications with WASz-based ISV applications, users can leverage both existing in-house applications and packaged ISV ones.

IBM WebSphere Studio Asset Analyzer for Multiplatforms creates an application-asset information repository for enterprise wide application understanding.

Other tools comprehend IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager. It allows monitoring and performance analysis of composite applications with J2EE front ends and CICS/IMS back ends. Asset Transformation Workbench can exist used to identify candidates for mainframe-application Web-service conversion and create these components.

About the author:Kernochan is president of Infostructure Associates

CA Integrates CA Endevor SCM, IBM Rational Developer for System z | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

CA Integrates CA Endevor SCM, IBM Rational Developer for System z

Sharing of views, programming elements helps customers streamline updates, reduce errors

Note: ESJ’s editors carefully elect vendor-issued press releases about fresh or upgraded products and services. They Have edited and/or condensed this release to highlight key features but design no claims as to the accuracy of the vendor's statements.

CA has integrated CA Endevor Software Change Manager (CA Endevor SCM), the company’s change management solution, and IBM’s Rational Developer for System z (RDz) V7.6, the IBM Rational mainframe evolution environment. This fresh integration is designed to significantly simplify the evolution and management of mainframe software by streamlining application updates, reducing change-related programming errors, and facilitating compliance audits.

Many mainframe developers already exhaust both RDz as their integrated evolution environment (IDE) and CA Endevor SCM for automating software lifecycle management tasks such as code merging, versioning, and change tracking. This integration gives customers the capacity to seamlessly link-related evolution and software lifecycle management tasks.

A programmer using RDz can now can extract the elements of an application within CA Endevor SCM awaiting modification, execute the modification, and store the changes back into CA Endevor SCM for acceptance into the next release of the application. The CA Endevor SCM edit environment now includes key RDz functions such as content assist and smart syntax check -- along with ISPF ascertain and feel. When completed, the changes are placed back into CA Endevor SCM so users can entrap handicap of sum CA Endevor SCM controls and build functionality. This unified approach to coding and release management can now improve productivity, accelerate time-to-delivery, and enable the auditability of programmer activities.

In addition, the integration enables RDz users to:

  • View CA Endevor SCM elements
  • Retrieve CA Endevor SCM elements to an RDz project in order to entrap handicap of the affluent RDz functionality
  • Filter the RDz views by environment, system, subsystem, stage ID, and factor to narrow down the number of elements that are visible at any given time.
  • Create multiple views using different combinations of environment, system, subsystem, stage ID, and factor to inspirit better organize the elements that are being accessed
  • Copy projects into CA Endevor SCM to leverage sum the CA Endevor SCM controls
  • Use RDz to invoke CA Endevor SCM’s build functions
  • Compare the history and version of CA Endevor SCM elements with the RDz visual compare
  • This integration supports CA’s Mainframe 2.0 initiative by reducing the cost of mainframe ownership and making it facile for a fresh generation of IT professionals to assume responsibility for mainframe management tasks. Customers can furthermore exhaust CA Mainframe Software Manager, a core Mainframe 2.0 deliverable, to automate the acquisition and installation of CA Endevor SCM.

    For more information, visit

    Software [In]security: vBSIMM entrap Two (BSIMM for Vendors Revised) | actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Gary McGraw and Sammy Migues interject a revised, compact version of the BSIMM for vendors called vBSIMM, which can exist thought of as a foundational security control for vendor management of third-party software providers.

    Like this article? They recommend 

    After introducing the vBSIMM in April 2011, they were fortunate enough to inspirit with a pilot of its application in the field at a great Wall Street bank.  They discussed the results of that experiment as well as the problem as a gross at the Second Annual BSIMM Conference in a workshop, then reported the results in the article Third-Party Software and Security in November 2011.  They Have revised the vBSIMM based on the pilot results and BSIMM participant feedback.

    Addison-Wesley Software Security SeriesTo remind you of what we’re doing here, the main problem we’re attacking with the vBSIMM is one of software developed by third-parties and used in security-critical systems such as banking systems.  As an example, the great bank where they ran the pilot estimates that they Have thousands of vendors creating third-party software in three discrete categories.  For now, they are sorting these vendors into two piles—"clueless" and "clueful"—and exhaust any results to inspirit sum of their vendors to entrap software security seriously.

    The vBSIMM is intentionally limited in scope and power, but it does Have its utility.  For information about the complete BSIMM, contemplate  Here, they interject a revised, compact version of the BSIMM for vendors called vBSIMM that leverages the power of attestation.  You can reflect of vBSIMM as a foundational security control for vendor management of third-party software providers.  If the BSIMM is a yardstick for enterprise software security, the vBSIMM is a 6-inch ruler.

    Measuring Third-Party Vendors Versus Third-Party Software

    Every modern enterprise uses lots of third-party software.  Some of this third-party software is custom built to specifications, some of it is COTS, and some lives in the cloud as section of a software-as-a-service (SaaS) model.  Many immense firms, especially in the monetary services vertical, are working difficult on software security and are looking for ways to identify and manage the risk of third-party software.

    The vBSIMM focuses explicitly on measuring the software security capability of a difficult as opposed to measuring the security of a particular piece of software.  In their view, measuring a piece of software directly as a way for determining its security is an untenable problem.  In the future they intend to determine how their activity-oriented approach coheres with simple bug scans of representative software samples from a vendor.  They Have already begun to gather data from the field for that work.

    During discussions involving both software vendors and acquirers at the BSIMM Conference in November 2011, a metrics-oriented approach to auditing a firm’s software security capability was suggested (see Third-Party Software and Security).  The top six metrics identified were:

  • Evidence of a documented Secure Software Security evolution Lifecycle (SSDL).
  • Artifacts backing up the activities descibed in the SSDL that provide some proof of exhaust (for example, results from an architecture risk analysis or results from a code review ).
  • Personal conversations with the Software Security Group lead that demonstrate a towering smooth of information about software security.  (The vBSIMM described here takes this approach.)
  • The very existence of a Software Security Group (SSG) .
  • A documented process for fixing security defects.
  • A third-party review.
  • As they revised the original vBSIMM, they took these metrics seriously and attempted to encompass them in the approach.

    We created the vBSIMM to meet three specific requirements:

  • the vBSIMM shall exist specific and lucid about actual software security activities
  • the vBSIMM shall discriminate between firms who know very runt about software security and firms who exercise some of the basics
  • the vBSIMM shall point in the direction of maturity in a way that coheres with the larger BSIMM
  • vBSIMM: Measuring Vendors

    Of the twelve practices in the BSIMM Software Security Framework (see below), they Have chosen to emphasize five different practices in the vendor-focused vBSIMM approach.  They are: Architecture Analysis, Code Review, Security Testing, Penetration Testing, and Configuration Management & Vulnerability Management.



    SDL Touchpoints


    Strategy and Metrics

    Attack Models

    Architecture Analysis

    Penetration Testing

    Compliance and Policy

    Security Features and Design

    Code Review

    Software Environment


    Standards and Requirements

    Security Testing

    Configuration Management and Vulnerability Management

    Within these five practices, they Have further identified 15 (of the 109) particular BSIMM activities that provide a straightforward and relatively lightweight measurement of software security capability in a firm.  Note that the main purpose of the vBSIMM (requirement 2) is to discriminate the "software security clueless" from the "software security clueful."

    The 15 smooth one and smooth two activities chosen from the BSIMM model demolish out as follows: Architecture Analysis (3), Code Review (3), Security Testing (3), Penetration Testing (3), and Configuration Management & Vulnerability Management (3).  Of these 15 activities, five are among the most commonly observed in BSIMM3.

    The vBSIMM analysis involves a self-assessment (with legal attestation) of the 15 activities.  Here’s how it works.

    We can order the 15 vBSIMM activities in a table as follows:

    BSIMM practice

    Identification & Response

    Process Integration

    Process Automation


    AA1.4 critical apps

    AA1.1 sec features

    AA1.2 ARA for high


    CR1.1 top bugs

    CR1.2 ad hoc SSG

    CR1.4 tool


    ST1.1 boundary/edge

    ST1.3 sec req tests

    ST2.1 tool


    PT1.1 externals

    PT1.2 mitigate loop

    PT1.3 internal tool


    CMVM1.1 incident

    CMVM1.2 sec à dev

    CMVM2.2 track defects

    The three activities in each exercise uncover a simple sage of maturity.  For example, Architecture Analysis begins with identifying high-risk critical apps, moves on to focus on reviewing security features, and matures into an architecture risk analysis (ARA) for high-risk apps.  Here are the three AA activities as defined in the BSIMM:

    AA1.4 exhaust risk questionnaire to rank applications. To facilitate the AA and other processes, the SSG uses a risk questionnaire to collect basic information about each application so that it can determine a risk classification and prioritization scheme. Questions might include, "Which programming languages is the application written in?," "Who uses the application?," and "Does the application wield PII?" A qualified member of the application team completes the questionnaire. The questionnaire is short enough to exist completed in a matter of hours. The SSG might exhaust the answers to bucket the application as high, medium, or low risk. Because a risk questionnaire can exist facile to game, it is primary that some spot-checking for validity and accuracy exist apportion in place. An over- reliance on self-reporting or automation can render this activity impotent.

    AA1.1 execute security feature review. To regain started with architecture analysis, hub the analysis process on a review of security features. Security-aware reviewers first identify the security features in an application (authentication, access control, exhaust of cryptography, etc.) then study the design looking for problems that would cause these features to fail at their purpose or otherwise prove insufficient. At higher levels of maturity, this activity is eclipsed by a more thorough approach to architecture analysis not centered on features. In some cases, exhaust of the firm’s secure by design components can streamline this process.

    AA1.2 execute design review for high-risk applications. The organization learns about the benefits of architecture analysis by seeing actual results for a few high-risk, towering profile applications. If the SSG is not yet equipped to execute an in-depth architecture analysis, it uses consultants to enact this work. Ad hoc review paradigms that reliance heavily on expertise may exist used here, though in the long race they enact not scale.

    The three vBSIMM activities in the Code Review exercise furthermore uncover a simple story.  open by identifying a list of top bugs (like the OWASP top ten, for example), Have the SSG execute ad hoc code review, then rush on to using a code review tool.  Here are the three activities as defined in the BSIMM:

    CR1.1 Create a top N bugs list (real data preferred). The SSG maintains a list of the most primary kinds of bugs that necessity to exist eliminated from the organization’s code. The list helps focus the organization’s attention on the bugs that matter most. A generic list could exist culled from public sources, but a list is much more valuable if it is specific to the organization and built from actual data gathered from code review, testing, and actual incidents. The SSG can periodically update the list and publish a "most wanted" report. (For another way to exhaust the list, contemplate [T2.2] Create/use material specific to company history.) One potential pitfall with a top N list is the problem of "looking for your keys only under the street light." Some firms exhaust multiple tools and actual code groundwork data to build top N lists, not constraining themselves to a particular service or tool. Simply sorting the day’s bug data by number of occurrences does not produce a satisfactory Top N list since it changes so often.

    CR1.2 Have SSG execute ad hoc review. The SSG performs an ad hoc code review for high-risk applications in an opportunistic fashion. For example, the SSG might result up the design review for high-risk applications with a code review. supplant ad hoc targeting with a systematic approach at higher maturity levels. SSG review may involve the exhaust of specific tools and services, or it may exist manual.

    CR1.4 exhaust automated tools along with manual review. Incorporate static analysis into the code review process in order to design code review more efficient and more consistent. The automation does not supplant human judgment, but it does bring definition to the review process and security expertise to reviewers who are not security experts. A difficult may exhaust an external service vendor as section of a formal code review process for software security. This service should exist explicitly connected to a larger SSDL applied during software evolution and not just "check the security box" on the path to deployment.

    The sage for the Security Testing exercise goes: start with very basic frontier and edge condition testing (to start thinking about tests at the limits), define some functional tests that probe security requirements, and then integrate a black box tool into the mix.  The three activities as defined by the BSIMM are:

    ST1.1 Ensure QA supports edge/boundary value condition testing. The QA team goes beyond functional testing to execute basic adversarial tests. They probe simple edge cases and frontier conditions. No attacker skills required. When QA understands the value of pushing past benchmark functional testing using acceptable input, they open to rush slowly toward "thinking fancy a immoral guy." A discussion of frontier value testing leads naturally to the notion of an attacker probing the edges on purpose. What happens when you enter the wrong password over and over?

    ST1.3 Allow declarative security/security features to drive tests. Testers target declarative security mechanisms and security features in general. For example, a tester could try to access administrative functionality as an unprivileged user or verify that a user account becomes locked after some number of failed authentication attempts. For the most part, security features can exist tested in a similar mode to other software features as can declarative security mechanisms such as account lockout, transaction limitations, entitlements, and so on. Of course, software security is not security software, but getting started with features is easy.

    ST2.1 Integrate black box security tools into the QA process (including protocol fuzzing). The organization uses one or more black box security testing tools as section of the quality assurance process. The tools are valuable because they encapsulate an attacker’s perspective, albeit in a generic fashion. Tools such as Rational AppScan or HP WebInspect are germane for Web applications and fuzzing frameworks such as PROTOS and Codenomicon are applicable for most network protocols. In some situations, the other groups might collaborate with the SSG to apply the tools. For example, a testing team could race the tool, but reach to the SSG for inspirit interpreting the results. In other cases, the SSG may race the tools at the proper stage of the SSDL.

    In the Penetration Testing practice, the three activities are linked by a similar simple story. Start using external penetration testers to inspirit demonstrate need, rush on to making sure that problems organize in pen tests are actually fixed, and finally develop an internal pen testing capability that uses tools.  Here are the three activities as defined in the BSIMM:

    PT1.1 exhaust external penetration testers to find problems. Many organizations are not willing to address software security until there is unmistakable evidence that the organization is not virtually magically immune to the problem. If security has not been a priority, external penetration testers demonstrate that the organization’s code needs help. Penetration testers could exist brought in to demolish a high-profile application in order to design the point. Over time, the focus of penetration testing moves from "I told you their stuff was broken" to a smoke test and sanity check done before shipping. External penetration testers bring a fresh set of eyes to the problem.

    PT1.2 Feed results to defect management and mitigation system. Penetration testing results are fed back to evolution through established defect management or mitigation channels and evolution responds using their defect management and release process. The exercise demonstrates the organization’s capacity to improve the state of security. Many firms are nascence to emphasize the critical import of not just identifying but more importantly fixing security problems. One way to ensure attention is to add a security flag to the bug tracking and defect management system.

    PT1.3 exhaust pen testing tools internally. The organization creates an internal penetration testing capability that makes exhaust of tools. This capability can exist section of the SSG, with the SSG occasionally performing a penetration test. The tools improve efficiency and repeatability of the testing process. Tools can comprehend off the shelf products, benchmark issue network penetration tools that understand the application layer, and hand-written scripts.

    Finally, the CMVM exercise furthermore includes a simple sage of progress.  Start with aligning incident response with the SSG, design sure that defects discovered in operations cycle back to the code base, and finally track defects to ensure that they are actually fixed.  Here are the three activities from the BSIMM:

    CMVM1.1 Create or interface with incident response. The SSG is prepared to respond to an incident. The group either creates its own incident response capability or interfaces with the organization’s existing incident response team. A regular meeting between the SSG and the incident response team can hold information flowing in both directions. In many cases, software security initiatives Have evolved from incident response teams who began to realize that software vulnerabilities were the bane of their existence.

    CMVM 1.2 Identify software defects organize in operations monitoring and feed them back to development. Defects identified through operations monitoring are fed back to evolution and used to change developer behavior. The contents of production logs can exist revealing (or can divulge the necessity for improved logging). In some cases, providing a way to enter incident triage data into an existing bug tracking system (many times making exhaust of a special security flag) seems to work. The conception is to close the information loop and design sure things regain fixed. In the best of cases, processes in the SSDL can exist improved.

    CMVM2.2 Track software bugs organize during ops through the fix process. Defects organize during operations are fed back to evolution and tracked through the fix process. This capability could reach in the shape of a two-way bridge between the bug finders and the bug fixers. design sure the loop is closed completely. Setting a security flag in the bug tracking system can inspirit facilitate tracking.

    The BSIMM includes an assessment of 109 activities that evaporate far beyond what the vBSIMM considers.  The vBSIMM is simply a subset of the BSIMM.  Those firms who already Have a BSIMM score automatically already Have a vBSIMM score (pretty much meaningless by comparison).  Those firms who are advanced past the basics as outlined in the vBSIMM should respect a more in depth analysis of their software security initiative using the BSIMM.

    vBSIMM: Measuring Vendors

    There are two ways to roll out the vBSIMM.  One is to allow a vendor to score itself (and self-attest).  The other is to Have a conversation with the vendor and render a score based on that and a quick ascertain at some associated artifacts.

    Scoring in the revised vBSIMM is super easy.  Sum the number of observed activities. 

    As the software aquirer, you are welcome to set the bar where you will as far as vBSIMM exhaust is concerned.  You can even codify thresholds and scores into an SLA.


    A self-assessment according to this scheme is easy.  The main rigor is that people (and firms) tend toward "grade inflation" during self-assesment.  One way to combat this is by asking people to note on the dotted line attesting to the fact that the information they are providing is correct.

    Here is a simple attestation shape for exhaust with the vBSIMM.

    Collecting Artifacts in support of the vBSIMM

    The 15 activities in the vBSIMM are linked by exercise into simple stories of maturity that culminate in process automation (see the Table above).  Acquirers making exhaust of the vBSIMM may quiz for artifacts from the vendor SDLC that provide some evidence backing claims that the activities are being carried out appropriately.  They Have identified the following list of artifacts that an acquiring difficult can request to enhance the vBSIMM scoring system.  recollect that the purpose of the vBSIMM is to measure a firm’s software security capability as an initiative and not to measure the security of a particular application.  Artifacts are representative only and should apply to processes and activities used to build a majority (hopefully all) software products made by a vendor.


    Artifacts from the SDLC


    Results from a typical specimen Architectural Risk Analysis


    Results from typical exhaust of a static analysis tool (e.g., Fortify, AppScan Source, Coverity, ...)


    Results from typical exhaust of a black box Web application testing tool (e.g., WebInspect, AppScan Standard, ...)


    A penetration test report.  A list of tools used in internal penetration testing.


    Process documents.  A URL for a security incident reporting website.  A written client communication policy governing security incidents.

    There are two things an acquirer might enact to enhance and customize the vBSIMM.  One is to design a more particular list of artifacts that the acquirer finds acceptable (listing which static analysis tools weigh and which enact not, for example).  The other is to link vBSIMM results to a process for evaluating a particular vendor application in such a way that the application is theme to more or less scrutiny based on vBSIMM score and the risk context of the application in question.

    Of course, the vBSIMM may exist integrated as section of a broader vendor management process. For example, existing vendor management processes may already capture additional information about software security governance, sign-off processes, incident response processes, and other items that are more section of the industry relationship than the vendor’s internal software security process. In this way, the vBSIMM score could become one component of an overall vendor "risk  score."

    vBSIMM is Only a Start

    The revised vBSIMM scheme is far from flawless and it does nothing to guarantee that any particular vendor product is actually secure enough for sum uses.  The vBSIMM scheme is far superior to no vendor control at all, however, and in their view is much superior to a badness-ometer-based approach using after-the-fact penetration testing focused only on a handful of bugs.

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    RSS Feed : :

    Back to Main Page | |