922-111 real questions | Pass4sure 922-111 real questions |

Pass4sure 922-111 dumps | 922-111 real questions |

922-111 Communication Server 1000 to Rls. 6.0 Upgrades for Technicians

Study usher Prepared by Nortel Dumps Experts 922-111 Dumps and real Questions

100% real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

922-111 exam Dumps Source : Communication Server 1000 to Rls. 6.0 Upgrades for Technicians

Test Code : 922-111
Test cognomen : Communication Server 1000 to Rls. 6.0 Upgrades for Technicians
Vendor cognomen : Nortel
real questions : 27 real Questions

i am very satisfied with 922-111 exam manual.
In no manner ever perception of passing the 922-111 exam answering utter questions efficiently. Hats off to you killexams. I wouldnt absorb completed this success with out the assist of your question and solution. It helped me draw immediate the concepts and i necessity to respond even the unknown questions. It is the real customized dump which met my necessity during education. Determined ninety percentage questions not unusual to the manual and replied them quickly to store time for the unknown questions and it worked. Thank you killexams.

actual select a ogle at questions today's 922-111 exam! notable source.
I didnt blueprint to apply any brain dumps for my IT certification test, but being beneath pressure of the difficulty of 922-111 exam, I ordered this package deal deal. I was stimulated through the worthy of those materials, they are simply really worth the cash, and i deem that they could fee greater, this is how awesome they may be! I didnt absorb any distress while taking my exam thanks to Killexams. I sincerely knew utter questions and answers! I got 97% with only some weeks exam schooling, except having a few drudgery revel in, which became sincerely beneficial, too. So positive, is truely pinnacle and incredibly encouraged.

can i ascertain dumps questions state-of-the-art 922-111 examination?
Hearty thanks to crew for the query & respond of 922-111 exam. It provided exquisite system to my questions on 922-111 I felt confident to stand the test. observed many questions inside the exam paper much like the guide. I strongly tang that the usher is silent valid. respect the endeavor with the aid of your crew contributors, The system of dealing subjects in a unique and uncommon manner is awesome. wish you humans create greater such examine publications in immediate to future for their convenience.

Is there a shortcut to antiseptic 922-111 examination?
Mysteriously I answerered utter questions in this exam. An abominable lot obliged its far a terrific asset for passing test. I recommend utter of us to in reality consume I test numerous books however disregarded to deserve it. Anyways in the wake of using Questions & solutions, i discovered the perquisite away forwardness in making plans questions and answers for the 922-111 exam. I saw utter of the troubles nicely.

Do not squander your time on searching, just deserve these 922-111 Questions from real test.
One of most intricate chore is to pick fine celebrate material for 922-111 certification exam. I never had adequate religion in myself and therefore concept I wouldnt deserve into my favourite university given that I didnt absorb adequate things to test from. This came into the photo and my perspective modified. I become able to deserve 922-111 absolutely prepared and I nailed my check with their help. Thank you.

try out these 922-111 dumps, it's far remarkable!
Just cleared 922-111 exam with top score and absorb to thank for making it possible. I used 922-111 exam simulator as my primary information source and got a solid passing score on the 922-111 exam. Very reliable, Im gay I took a leap of faith purchasing this and trusted killexams. Everything is very professional and reliable. Two thumbs up from me.

determined maximum 922-111 Questions in present day-day dumps that I organized.
Coaching kit has been very beneficial utter through my exam schooling. I absorb been given 100% i am now not a greattake a celebrate taker and may travel blank on the exam, which isnt an awesome component, in particular if that is 922-111 exam, when time is your enemy. I had tang of failing IT tests inside the beyond and preferred to hold away fromit at utter prices, so i bought this package deal deal. It has helped me skip with a hundred%. It had the entirety I had to recognize, and on the grounds that I had spent limitless hours analyzing, cramming and making notes, I had no hassle passing this exam with the very pleasant score feasible.

agree with it or no longer, just try 922-111 ogle at questions as soon as! Dumps web page helped me deserve get perquisite of entry to to diverse exam schooling material for 922-111 exam. I was careworn that which one I want to select out, but your specimens helped me select the super one. I purchased Dumps direction, which notably helped me behold utter of the crucial ideas. I solved utter questions in due time. I am absolutely gay to absorb as my tutor. An abominable lot desired

How much 922-111 exam and prep usher cost?
922-111 questions from are incredible, and replicate exactly what check hub gives you at the 922-111 exam. I loved the all thing approximately the training material. I passed with over eighty%.

easy way to pass 922-111 exam with these real questions and exam Simulator.
With using excellent merchandise of, I had scored 90 two percentage marks in 922-111 certification. I waslooking for dependable examine dump to boom my information degree. Technical requirements and difficult language of my certification modified into difficult to understand therefore i was searching for liable and simple testproducts. I had approach to recognise this net site for the coaching of expert certification. It was no longer an smooth mission butonly has made this undertaking simple for me. I am emotion terrific for my success and this platform is worthy for me.

Nortel Communication Server 1000 to

Microsoft-Nortel behold Unified Communications superior points | real Questions and Pass4sure dumps


Microsoft-Nortel behold Unified Communications features
  • with the aid of Kurt Mackie
  • 07/18/2007
  • A one-12 months-historic partnership between Microsoft and Nortel on unified communications expertise, universal as the inventive Communications Alliance , is manner fruit. the two businesses announced this week that they absorb got offered more than 430,000 joint-options licenses up to now.

    The Alliance recently gained three original customers as smartly, together with Indiana university, U.k.-based mostly Worcestershire health tips and Communications expertise functions, and an IT and telephony provider referred to as 4ward.

    Microsoft and Nortel fashioned the inventive Communications Alliance in July of ultimate year with the intent of supplying unified communications solutions to agencies. below the Alliance, the businesses initiated joint analysis and construction efforts. They additionally created customer demonstration facilities and engaged in joint revenue and marketing.

    in the Alliance's preliminary press release, Jeff Raikes, Microsoft's company Division president, pointed out that the joint unified communications respond would enable a "single identity across e-mail, voice mail, voice over internet protocol (VoIP) convene processing, rapid messaging and video."

    The Alliance's major product is known as Nortel Converged office, a unified communications gadget that integrates Nortel's VoIP telephony gadget with Microsoft's server expertise.

    The main add-ons of Converged office consist of:

  • Microsoft workplace Communicator 2005 delicate client
  • Microsoft workplace live Communications Server 2005, and
  • Nortel verbal exchange Server a thousand release 4.5 or better IP PBX.
  • there may be additionally a Nortel software hub element that supports non-compulsory capabilities, together with internet integration, interactive voice response and deserve in feel with hub functions.

    Unified communications receives described in various ways, however according to the IEEE, it typically encompasses "unified messaging, collaboration and interplay methods." These systems additionally typically allow real-time and immediate actual-time communications. additionally, combined media (voice, e-mail, fax, and so forth.) can be accessed from a solitary application, unbiased of the entry device.

    competition within the unified communications house is thick with great names. In March of this year, IBM and Cisco, announced a collaborative endeavor on unified messaging client expertise referred to as Unified Communications and Collaboration (UC2). UC2 is based on open technologies, equivalent to Eclipse evolution atmosphere and the Open capabilities Gateway Initiative framework. Citrix methods and Nokia, among others, absorb expressed aid for the UC2 platform.

    beneath the IBM-Cisco unified communications partnership, Cisco plans to sell IBM's Lotus Sametime collaboration solution and IBM plans to promote Cisco's Unified Communications supervisor, Cisco team spirit and Cisco Unified MeetingPlace products. The total unified communications solution is designed and delivered with the aid of IBM international know-how functions.

    about the writer

    Kurt Mackie is senior news producer for the 1105 trade Computing community.

    Microsoft and Nortel existing Alliance Roadmap | real Questions and Pass4sure dumps


    Microsoft and Nortel present Alliance Roadmap Six months after proverb a telecommunications alliance, Microsoft and Nortel this week presented some early results of their efforts and outlined a roadmap for future projects.

    the two groups first introduced their collaboration final summer.

    The street map includes three original joint options “to dramatically augment trade communications with the aid of breaking down the limitations between voice, electronic mail, rapid messaging, multimedia conferencing and different forms of communique,” according to an announcement by both organisations.

    also protected in the announcement are eleven original implementation services from Nortel and the opening of more than 20 joint demonstration facilities where customers can journey the technology, the statement persevered.

    additionally, the two agencies stated they absorb signed agreements with dozens of customers, and absorb developed a “pipeline of tons of of prospects who wish to know the merits of unified communications.”

    From Microsoft's viewpoint, it is utter share of the enterprise's long-time era play to merge every kind of communications and messaging perquisite into a solitary framework. A yr in the past, the trade introduced that it was merging its trade Server neighborhood with its actual-Time Collaboration (RTC) group, and that it had begun to feel of the two technologies comprising a "platform."

    the original community turned into named the Unified Communications community (UCG) and resides in Microsoft's company Division. The theory for the original group emanated from a vision of including continuity to a myriad of communications contraptions, applied sciences and modes -- from electronic mail and fleet messaging to Voice over internet Protocol (VoIP), audio/video and internet conferencing -- in a unified manner.

    The three original joint solutions announced by the alliance this week are named Unified Communications built-in branch, Unified Messaging, and Conferencing.

    When it's purchasable in the fourth quarter, UC built-in department will comprise Nortel and Microsoft expertise on a solitary piece of hardware that provides VoIP and unified communications in far off places of work.

    Coming a bit previous in the 2d quarter, Unified Messaging will intent to simplify client deployments, indigenous session initiation protocol (SIP) interoperability between the Nortel communique Server a thousand and Microsoft trade Server 2007. The respond contains Nortel knowledgeable services for design, deployment and guide.

    also coming within the fourth quarter, Conferencing will prolong Nortel Multimedia Conferencing to Microsoft workplace Communicator 2007. It goals to deliver a solitary customer adventure constant throughout applications comparable to voice, fleet messaging, presence, and audio- and videoconferencing.

    This 12 months, the agencies additionally blueprint to lengthen their existing unified communications solution — a unified desktop and delicate mobilephone for VoIP, electronic mail, fleet messaging and presence — to the Nortel communique Server 2100, a provider-grade enterprise telephony product supporting as much as 200,000 users on a solitary system, in response to trade statements.

    As for the street map, both organizations absorb equipped more than 20 joint demonstration facilities in North the us, Europe and Asia, with more than a hundred extra facilities scheduled to open through midyear.

    Nortel has additionally added 11 core integration functions to assist consumers build, deploy and aid joint unified communications solutions, including conclusion-to-end assignment administration. Nortel claims it has already expert more than 2,200 VoIP experts to bring these capabilities and should add more as deployment ramps up.

    concerning the writer

    Stuart J. Johnston has lined technology, in particular Microsoft, since February 1988 for InfoWorld, Computerworld, counsel Week, and workstation World, as well as for commercial enterprise Developer, XML & net functions, and .internet magazines.

    Nortel and Microsoft CEOs outline Transformation of trade Communications | real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

    manhattan — Jan. 17, 2007 — today, Microsoft Corp. CEO Steve Ballmer and Nortel* CEO and President Mike Zafirovski introduced a joint highway map to deliver their shared vision for unified communications. The highway map is the influence of an alliance between Microsoft and Nortel announced in July 2006, and includes three original joint solutions to dramatically help enterprise communications by using breaking down the limitations between voice, electronic mail, immediate messaging, multimedia conferencing and other styles of communication.

    speaking at an event at Studio 8H in Rockefeller core to more than 100 consumers together with reporters and analysts, Ballmer and Zafirovski outlined how corporations can help employee productiveness and effectiveness and in the reduction of the expenses and complexity of communications. They additionally introduced eleven original implementation services from Nortel and the outlet of more than 20 joint demonstration centers where shoppers can adventure the expertise firsthand.

    in precisely six months due to the fact that the alliance became formed, the two groups absorb signed agreements with dozens of purchasers, and absorb developed a pipeline of lots of of possibilities who are looking to understand the advantages of unified communications.

    “we are executing forcefully on the imaginative and prescient of this alliance and absorb made tremendous development,” Zafirovski pointed out. “We accomplished the planning ranges and at the jiffy are delivering unified communications options to groups utter over the world. Their purpose is to shut the hole between the instruments they consume to converse and the enterprise functions they consume to shun their groups, giving personnel the vigour to compose consume of assistance greater promptly and comfortably.”

    “The customary worker receives more than 50 messages each day1 on as much as seven distinct gadgets or applications,” Ballmer brought. “application can and should assist address the continued challenge of managing communications and this problem is the driving theory at the back of their alliance with Nortel. collectively, they will evolve VoIP and unified communications to integrate utter of the approaches they contact every different in a simple atmosphere, the consume of a solitary id throughout telephones, PCs and other instruments.”

    New solutions to enhance Communications and Collaboration

    Microsoft and Nortel fashioned the imaginative Communications Alliance to assist companies seriously change enterprise communications through dashing up the transition to voice over cyber web protocol (VOIP) and unified communications. supplying on the vision they outlined in July, Microsoft and Nortel nowadays introduced three original solutions:

  • UC integrated branch. This original product from the alliance will accommodate Nortel and Microsoft® know-how on a solitary piece of hardware that provides in your price range, top notch and straightforward-to-set up VoIP and unified communications in remote offices. The UC built-in department is planned to be obtainable in the fourth quarter of 2007.

  • Unified Messaging. To simplify client deployments, indigenous session initiation protocol (SIP) interoperability between the Nortel communique Server one thousand and Microsoft trade Server 2007 Unified Messaging is deliberate to be attainable within the 2nd quarter of 2007. The respond includes Nortel expert services for design, deployment and assist.

  • Conferencing. This original solution will prolong the flush feature set of Nortel Multimedia Conferencing to Microsoft workplace Communicator 2007, delivering a single, regularly occurring client tang consistent throughout purposes corresponding to voice, speedy messaging, presence, and audio- and videoconferencing. The on-premise respond is planned to be attainable in the fourth quarter of 2007.

  • In 2007, the companies besides blueprint to lengthen their current unified communications respond — a unified desktop and soft phone for VoIP, e-mail, fleet messaging and presence — to the Nortel communication Server 2100, a service-grade commercial enterprise telephony product supporting as much as 200,000 clients on a solitary system.

    furthermore, Nortel and Microsoft introduced a highway map for 2008 and beyond for moving trade communications onto a utility platform designed to force a higher-nice user tang and in the reduction of complete cost of possession. The highway map outlines a few key functions and technology traits together with a unified communications contact middle, Nortel role server, expanded hosted UC options, mobility and customer solutions, and application-mindful networking enhancements.

    “imaginitive communications and collaboration applied sciences are vital to entirely enabling Royal Dutch Shell’s world drudgery force, and key to working at reform quartile in their business. They correspond with in and aid the vision Nortel and Microsoft absorb outlined,” spoke of Johan Krebbers, group IT architect at Royal Dutch Shell, who joined Ballmer and Zafirovski onstage for today’s experience. “Over the next several years, they blueprint emigrate their community to a utility-primarily based communications system developed on technologies represented by means of the Nortel and Microsoft alliance.”

    Experiencing VoIP and Unified Communications options

    The corporations introduced that they've outfitted more than 20 joint demonstration centers in North the united states, Europe and Asia, with greater than 100 further facilities scheduled to open via midyear.

    In a related announcement, Nortel added eleven core integration functions to aid customers build, deploy and aid joint unified communications options, together with conclusion-to-conclusion project administration. Nortel already has greater than 2,200 VoIP consultants to convey these functions and should add greater as deployment ramps up. This group is supported via the ten,000-mighty Nortel global services crew and a huge ecosystem of services partners.

    About Nortel

    Nortel is a identified leader in providing communications capabilities that enhance the human adventure, ignite and punch global commerce, and cozy and protect the realm’s most essential tips. Their subsequent-generation technologies, for each carrier providers and corporations, span entry and core networks, assist multimedia and company-important applications, and aid purge today’s obstacles to effectivity, pace and efficiency through simplifying networks and connecting americans with guidance. Nortel does trade in additional than one hundred fifty countries.

    About Microsoft

    centered in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq “MSFT”) is the worldwide leader in application, services and options that mitigate people and organizations realize their complete expertise.

    note to editors: if you are interested in viewing additional information on Microsoft, delight consult with the Microsoft web web page at on Microsoft’s company counsel pages. net hyperlinks, cellphone numbers and titles were proper at time of book, however may besides since absorb changed. For further guidance, journalists and analysts may additionally contact Microsoft’s swift Response crew or other acceptable contacts listed at .

    innovative Communications Alliance customer aid


    BT global functions is the division of BT neighborhood that offers networked IT features worldwide that permit multinational, multisite organizations to thrive and grow within the digital networked economy

    “The Nortel and Microsoft alliance has the abilities to speed up and simplify the consciousness of unified communications for a significant a share of their client base. BT leads by way of instance, and we're already using trade Server 2007 Unified Messaging with their Nortel telephony device. From this tang and from their Place as a number one organization of networked IT features, they confidence that the native, requirements-based mostly SIP interoperability that Microsoft and Nortel introduced nowadays should simplify deployments and in the reduction of complete cost of ownership.”

  • Tom CraigPresident, IP NetworkingBT world services

  • CLSA

    With operations in 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific location and the fiscal facilities of original york and London, CLSA is without doubt one of the leading fiscal powerhouses worldwide. Hong Kong-based CLSA is an award-successful difficult that offers features in brokerage, funding banking and personal equity.

    “We needed to link their regional places of drudgery and headquarters, with more than 1,000 personnel, with a system that greater their capacity to execute trades and provide reporting records. The imaginative Communications Alliance is delivering a unified communications materiel that brings the power of Nortel’s IP telephony together with the collaboration of Microsoft office live Communications Server to supply a solution sophisticated to anything in the marketplace. it's going to allow us to meet the needs of their customers, meet their regulatory requirements across many nations and simplify communications for their employees. because the creative Communications Alliance makes it workable for us to leverage their present infrastructure, it is the most low in cost solution available.”

  • T. RajahChief assistance OfficerCLSA

  • Fred Weber Inc.

    Fred Weber Inc. is the St. Louis area’s leader in hefty and dual carriageway development. primarily based in Maryland Heights, Mo., this $300 million-a-year, worker-owned trade focuses on full-carrier concrete and asphalt paving tasks and is the area’s largest materials employer. The company’s drudgery philosophies today are the identical as those of founder Fred Weber seventy eight years in the past. of these, “The should constantly deem and alter company practices to more desirable serve consumers” led Fred Weber Inc. to leverage the Nortel and Microsoft relationship.

    “At Fred Weber, their needs are distinctive than different agencies. Their enterprise exists beyond four walls and a natural office complex. This creates a faultfinding want for positive and legit integrated communications. Orchestrating 1,200 personnel across their 25 evolution and materials areas as well as their a number of subsidiary groups can besides be a logistical nightmare. The inventive Communications Alliance respond offered by Nortel and Microsoft helps unravel this problem, and permits us to spend greater time with their shoppers and respond in precise time to their wants.”

  • Phillip HagemannChief suggestions OfficerFred Weber Inc.

  • international SOS

    foreign SOS is the realm’s main company of medical counsel, overseas healthcare and protection services. With operations in 65 international locations and a 4,500-potent drudgery force, international SOS helps corporations and agencies control the fitness and protection dangers their travelers, expatriates and world drudgery force face.

    “presenting extremely superior services to their customers globally requires efficient conversation internally and externally. engaging Nortel and Microsoft’s resourceful Communications Alliance relationship gives us the opportunity to allot in force a blended technology respond that enables us to augment their core company of providing healthcare and protection capabilities worldwide.”

  • Todd SchofieldChief technology OfficerInternational SOS

  • Thomas faculty

    Thomas school, a private faculty in Waterville, Maine, is committed to profession training with a tradition of educating students in business, technology and training. With greater than 950 undergraduate and graduate students, and a college of 66, Thomas is adopting chopping-edge Microsoft and Nortel counsel expertise under the aegis of the inventive Communications Alliance.

    “whereas they are a small faculty, we've the intent of enforcing unified communications capabilities to serve their students and school on par with universities which absorb bigger enrollments and bigger budgets. we've used the Nortel telephony infrastructure for 2 a long time and are actually the usage of Microsoft office reside Communications Server, so the imaginitive Communications Alliance unified communications suite is a natural extension. The blueprint is to installation the creative Communications Alliance respond to combine communications, raise online coursework, and provide a custom, campuswide rapid messaging means and a collaborative electronic blackboard means. The net outcome is that they are a 113-12 months-historical establishment it's preparing their college students for fulfillment in their very own and expert lives, and for leadership and service of their communities.”

  • Chris RhodaVice President of tips ServicesThomas faculty

  • Nortel CEO and President Mike Zafirovski (left) and Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer (appropriate) discussing the groups’ shared vision for unified communications. long island, original york. Jan. 17, 2007

    Whilst it is very difficult chore to select liable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people deserve ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com compose it unavoidable to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients approach to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and trait because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self self-possession is vital to utter of us. Specially they manage review, reputation, ripoff report complaint, trust, validity, report and scam. If perhaps you behold any bogus report posted by their competitor with the cognomen killexams ripoff report complaint internet, ripoff report, scam, complaint or something like this, just withhold in irony that there are always deplorable people damaging reputation of superior services due to their benefits. There are a great number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams rehearse questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Brain dumps Menu

    HA-022X mock exam | CBAP test prep | 640-803 rehearse test | 000-741 cram | C9030-634 real questions | 920-482 braindumps | HP5-K01D rehearse test | 9A0-146 dumps | 000-184 braindumps | 922-111 real questions | C2150-400 pdf download | 000-349 braindumps | 251-312 exam prep | 77-600 brain dumps | HP0-T21 study guide | ST0-151 questions and answers | PPM-001 questions answers | C2040-411 test prep | C2170-008 free pdf | 70-554-CSharp dumps questions |

    Pass4sure 922-111 rehearse Tests with real Questions
    Simply tang their Questions bank and feel unavoidable about the 922-111 test. You will pass your exam at high marks or your cash back. They absorb collected a database of 922-111 Dumps from real exams to allow you to prepare and pass 922-111 exam on the specific first attempt. Basically set up their Exam Simulator and prepare. You will pass the exam.

    The only way to deserve success in the Nortel 922-111 exam is that you should obtain liable preparation material. They guarantee that is the most direct pathway towards Nortel Communication Server 1000 to Rls. 6.0 Upgrades for Technicians exam. You will be victorious with complete confidence. You can view free questions at before you buy the 922-111 exam products. Their simulated tests are in multiple-choice the same as the real exam pattern. The questions and answers created by the certified professionals. They provide you with the tang of taking the real test. 100% guarantee to pass the 922-111 actual test. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for utter exams on website
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for utter Orders
    Click absorb their specialists Team to guarantee their Nortel 922-111 exam questions are dependably the most recent. They are on the all extremely acquainted with the exams and testing focus.

    How withhold Nortel 922-111 exams updated?: they absorb their uncommon approaches to know the most recent exams data on Nortel 922-111. Now and then they contact their accomplices who are exceptionally cozy with the testing focus or once in a while their clients will email us the latest input, or they got the most recent update from their dumps providers. When they ascertain the Nortel 922-111 exams changed then they updates them ASAP.

    On the off chance that you truly approach up short this 922-111 Communication Server 1000 to Rls. 6.0 Upgrades for Technicians and would prefer not to sit tight for the updates then they can give you complete refund. however, you ought to ship your score respond to us with the goal that they can absorb a check. They will give you complete refund quickly amid their working time after they deserve the Nortel 922-111 score report from you.

    Nortel 922-111 Communication Server 1000 to Rls. 6.0 Upgrades for Technicians Product Demo?: they absorb both PDF version and Testing Software. You can check their product page to perceive what it would appear that like.

    At the point when will I deserve my 922-111 material after I pay?: Generally, After successful payment, your username/password are sent at your email address within 5 min. It may select diminutive longer if your bank delay in payment authorization. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for utter exams on website
    PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for utter Orders

    922-111 Practice Test | 922-111 examcollection | 922-111 VCE | 922-111 study guide | 922-111 practice exam | 922-111 cram

    Killexams PTCB rehearse Test | Killexams 310-400 real questions | Killexams 650-126 study guide | Killexams LOT-916 VCE | Killexams E20-005 questions and answers | Killexams LE0-583 real questions | Killexams HP2-K37 sample test | Killexams 000-373 free pdf | Killexams E20-320 exam prep | Killexams ISSEP study guide | Killexams 1Z0-419 cheat sheets | Killexams JK0-U31 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-067 rehearse test | Killexams 1Z0-466 dumps questions | Killexams CVA braindumps | Killexams 250-252 questions answers | Killexams 000-026 study guide | Killexams 700-001 cram | Killexams 9A0-146 rehearse questions | Killexams C2090-735 rehearse test |

    Exam Simulator : Pass4sure 922-111 VCE Exam Simulator

    View Complete list of Brain dumps

    Killexams C9520-911 questions and answers | Killexams 644-906 rehearse exam | Killexams M8010-246 free pdf | Killexams BCP-620 VCE | Killexams 310-400 brain dumps | Killexams CAT-060 braindumps | Killexams Series6 rehearse test | Killexams HP0-M43 pdf download | Killexams 000-922 exam questions | Killexams 3X0-202 study guide | Killexams 98-383 exam prep | Killexams HP3-X10 sample test | Killexams 000-M79 cram | Killexams 250-512 free pdf download | Killexams NCCT-ICS braindumps | Killexams VCS-371 braindumps | Killexams 000-435 free pdf | Killexams MA0-100 rehearse test | Killexams 000-864 dumps | Killexams 00M-641 dump |

    Communication Server 1000 to Rls. 6.0 Upgrades for Technicians

    Pass 4 sure 922-111 dumps | 922-111 real questions |

    Computer-Based Anesthesiology Paging System | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    The efficient management of operating suites requires watchful resource management. Most expenses of a health trust organization are personnel related (1), and successful management of medical personnel determines whether an operational unit is a revenue hub or a cost hub (2,3). Patient outcomes, particularly in anesthesiology, depend on the availability of expensive personnel, especially physicians (4,5). In a crisis, rapid mobilization of trained personnel is faultfinding to successful resolution (6).

    Mayo Clinic has a long history of efficient management of personnel, by which the erudition and expertise of its physicians are leveraged through extensive consume of allied health personnel. One strategy, implemented >100 yr ago, is the consume of visual communication systems to direct physicians and allied health personnel to where they are needed. This began with the introduction of colored wooden door tabs. Each color denoted the state of a room. For example, a green tab indicated that the patient was in the scope and ready to be seen by a nurse. A blue tab indicated that the patient was ready to be seen by a physician. A red tab indicated that mitigate was needed for an emergency.

    This communication strategy spread from the outpatient rehearse to the hospitals, including the operating suites. Subsequently, door tabs were replaced by colored electric lights. A chime was sounded when the state of a scope changed. This communication strategy was thought to help the efficiency and trait of trust in the operative environment. In 1981, a original operating suite was opened at Saint Marys Hospital, 1 of 2 hospitals associated with Mayo Clinic. This prompted updating the communication technology at both hospitals. Electric lights were replaced with video displays suspended from the ceilings or mounted on the walls in the operating rooms (OR), procedure rooms, and support areas.

    This Video Paging System (VPS) used alphanumeric codes to communicate the state of each patient trust location (7). Pages were initiated by consume of electromechanical switches in each OR, procedure room, and preoperative and postoperative location. When a switch was closed (by pushing a button), an alphanumeric code, designating both the location and the individual needed, would be displayed throughout the operative or procedural suite, and in every procedure room, hallway, recovery and waiting area, lounge, office, and cafeteria. In addition, an emergency code was incorporated to rapidly direct staff to a particular location when a cardiac arrest, airway emergency, or other faultfinding event occurred.

    Over time, several problems emerged with the VPS. The black-and-white monitors that displayed the pages burned in after about 18 mo, making the displays unreadable. Replacement monitors were costly and difficult to find. The software was difficult to maintain, and software constraints became unacceptable as the rehearse grew and evolved. When seven additional ORs were built at Saint Marys Hospital, and OR numbering changed from two digits to three digits, the VPS could not accommodate the change. These problems triggered the conclusion to replace the VPS with a original communication system.

    Design Criteria

    Several types of devices were examined as workable solutions. Cell phones, digital pagers, and personal digital assistants were considered to possibly be less expensive and more elastic solutions than the existing hardwired approach. However, these options were rejected as being too conditional on personnel. If the paged individual did not respond, there would be no way to know whether the reform beeper was called, whether the person was unavailable, or to whom the page should be redirected. To respond to a page, one must interact with these devices, which can be impractical during procedures. It was concluded that a hands-free system would be designed and implemented.

    With diminutive review or documentation, the VPS had evolved on an ad hoc basis with additional functions and a broader geographic distribution. Missing comprehensive system documentation made determining where the current system was used and what information was transmitted challenging. A watchful analysis of original requirements was completed, redundant and unnecessary functions were eliminated, and the geographic distribution of the original system was planned.

    Prototyping technologic solutions occurred simultaneously. A distributed video architecture was rejected because of its inherent instability. Because the cathode-ray tube displays had only an 18- to 24-mo useful life, liquid crystal and light-emitting diode (LED) displays were considered. LED displays were chosen because they absorb a useful life of at least 15 yr and a greater luminosity that prevents washout from fluorescent and natural lighting. These displays are relatively expensive, but the cost can be amortized over a longer useful life. Choosing the size of the characters on the displays was a trade-off between the distance at which the displays could be read and the required information content. The size and information layout of the LED displays were determined by their expected placement, for example how low the displays could hang from hallway ceilings. The conclusion was made to develop in-house a configurable, centrally programmable keypad that would replace the electromechanical switches.

    Several distribution architectures were considered. consume of the institutional Ethernet network was an attractive, inexpensive option, but pages could be delayed when network bandwidth require was greatest. Because pages are time-sensitive, this risk was deemed unacceptable. Therefore, an independent Ethernet network was chosen to drive the system. The computer-based anesthesiology paging system (CAPS) was designed to be upgradeable and easily configured. Software running on yardstick hardware is more easily adaptable and requires fewer maintenance personnel. consume of commercially available components besides reduces costs for evolution and maintenance (Fig. 1).

    System Specifications

    The CAPS runs on dual-processor, redundant Compaq servers (Compaq Computer, Houston, TX) using SQL Server 7.0 under the Windows NT 4.0 operating system (Microsoft, Redmond, WA). Because the system is used as an emergency indicator, continuous availability is required. A redundant Central Processing Unit architecture satisfies this up time requirement. Software was written in Microsoft’s Visual Basic 6.0 and Visual C++ 6.0. The distribution architecture is a star pattern of Ethernet and RS-422 devices connected by yardstick Category-5 cable. Terminal servers connect the RS-422 protocol LED displays and the programmable keypads to the Ethernet network. The server can ship daily electronic mail with system statistics and maintenance needs. The CAPS can ship a page to a beeper for imperative maintenance problems (Fig. 1). The server software connects to the terminal server ports (one device per port) via device controllers. A simple network management protocol manager restarts failed connections without manual intervention.

    The software design optimizes the handling of original pages to assure the shortest workable time between placing a page and seeing it on the LED displays. If there are no vigorous emergency pages, utter original pages are processed and displayed within 1.5 s. The user initiates a page by either pressing a dedicated microswitch (hot key) or entering a numeric code on the keypad (Fig. 2). The page is sent to the keypad controller via the terminal server. The keypad controller associates the page with a specific keypad, the keypad’s workgroup (e.g., neurologic anesthesia or vascular radiology), and other necessary information. The page is then presented via a Microsoft ActiveX Data kick convene to the SQL Server database engine. The database determines what text is to be displayed on the LED displays and then forwards the text to the queue manager. The database then returns control to the keypad controller, which illuminates an LED above the activated torrid key. If a page for a physician or nurse is initiated from an OR, a light above that room’s door illuminates as a wayfinding aid.

    The queue manager determines the workgroups for a original page and inserts the original page either into those groups’ new-page queues or emergency queues. Although there are seldom >15 vigorous calls, each queue may hold up to 100 calls. At 1.5-s intervals, the parade controllers query the queue manager for the next page. The parade controller then forwards that page to each display. If the page is displayed for the first time, a chime sounds. The current time, synchronized with the atomic clock in Boulder, CO, is displayed in the upper perquisite corner, except when emergency pages are displayed. The parade controllers then fulfill housekeeping chores (e.g., querying displays for functional status), during the remnant of the 1.5-s interval before querying the queue manager for the next page. After a page has been displayed once, it is placed in the active-page queue. The queue manager then cycles through this queue while any pages are active. Emergency pages are not placed in the active-page queue. When an emergency page is initiated, it is the only page shown on the LED displays, the light above the scope door blinks, and the chime is sounded repeatedly until the page is answered. In the unlikely event that two or more emergency pages are vigorous simultaneously, only the emergency pages are cycled until answered.

    The central servers, terminal servers, operating system, and database are utter commercial products. The LED displays were initially custom-made products, but the manufacturer has subsequently added them to their yardstick product line. These displays are located throughout the hospitals where anesthesia services are provided or anesthesia personnel congregate.

    The programmable keypads were designed in-house and were assembled and tested under contract. The keypads can accept original embedded code downloaded from the server. This allows for remote reprogramming of the keypads without maintenance personnel physically interacting with each keypad (i.e., removing >450 keypads from the wall and reprogramming them with a laptop computer). Therefore, upgrading the keypads is rapid and cost-effective.

    An administrative program and several specialized tools for maintenance personnel were developed. The administrative program’s graphical user interface masks the relational database’s complexity and presents a more simplified view of the system. Pages, devices, reports, and other aspects of the system can be managed without consume of the evolution engineering group. This feature allows maintenance personnel to be trained technicians, thereby decreasing the total cost of ownership and freeing the evolution engineering staff for other projects.

    User Functionality

    The CAPS presents two kinds of pages: 1) class page, which is a page for a class of individuals to approach to a patient location, and 2) person page, which is a page for a specific individual to approach to a multiple-patient location. Class pages absorb three parts. The prefix characters are alphabetic, denoting the drudgery region (e.g., “N” for the north anesthesia region or “CL” for the catheterization laboratory). The middle characters denote the scope number within that drudgery group (e.g., “N 808” for scope 808 in the north anesthesia region or “CL 109” for scope 109 in the catheterization laboratory). The suffix character denotes the class of person needed in the room. Therefore, complete pages would be “N 808 A,” acceptation that an anesthesiologist is needed in scope 808 in the north anesthesia area, or “CL 109 N,” acceptation that a nurse anesthetist is needed in scope 109 of the catheterization laboratory. Person pages absorb two parts. The prefix denotes a multiple-patient location (e.g., “P” for postanesthesia trust unit or “o” for outpatient recovery). The other characters are numeric, denoting the individual needed. Therefore, a complete person page would be “P49,” acceptation that person “49” is needed in the postanesthesia trust unit.

    Using CAPS is reasonably straightforward. For example, if a resident physician in cardiac catheterization scope 104 needs to parley with the attending anesthesiologist, the resident pushes the “Physician” button on the keypad mounted on the anesthesia machine (Fig. 3). An LED above the button illuminates, confirming that the page has been received. Every monitor throughout the cardiac catheterization suite, including the scope initiating the page, displays “CL 104 A” in green and chimes briefly (Fig. 4). The page remains on the LED parade for 1.5 s as the system cycles from page to page. A page cycles every 1.5 s until it is deactivated by a person; there is no timeout feature for pages. When the attending anesthesiologist enters the scope and pushes the “Physician” button, the page is no longer displayed anywhere and the LED above the button turns off. If the resident considers the page to be urgent, the resident pushes the “Urgent” button (Fig. 3) and then the “Physician” button; “CL 104 A” would appear in orange and cycles with any other pages. If there is an emergency in the procedure room, the two side-by-side emergency buttons are pushed simultaneously (Fig. 3). This action persistently displays “CL 104 A” in shining red on every parade in the catheterization laboratory, and a chime rings until the emergency buttons in the scope are pushed simultaneously. In the unusual event of >1 simultaneous emergency page, the parade will cycle from emergency page to emergency page every 1.5 s, sounding the chime persistently, until utter emergency pages are deactivated.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3

    Figure 4

    Figure 4

    This same basic feature is available throughout the environment of the CAPS. A torrid key is pushed on the keypad and the defined page is displayed throughout the respective operating or procedural suite. Other examples of workable pages are shown in Table 1. The torrid keys can vary from keypad to keypad. For example, in the operating suite, anesthesiologists and certified registered nurse-anesthetists are the only licensed providers with torrid keys, whereas in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, a torrid key pages registered nurses who provide sedation care. The system has the competence to add many additional pages through consume of the numeric keys (Fig. 3). For example, by pressing “246” followed by the “Enter” key, a unique page can be displayed, such as “CL 104 MP” for medical photographer. The keypad screen (Fig. 3) displays the keyed page, confirming to the user that the page has been received. If >1 page is entered via the keypad, instead of the torrid keys, the pages are cycled every 1.5 s on the keypad’s screen.

    The LED displays are more useful than the VPS cathode-ray tube monitors, which displayed a maximum of only four black-and-white characters. like the CAPS, the VPS prefix character designated the workgroup, two digits identified the scope number, and the suffix character indicated the personnel being paged. The CAPS displays allow a prefix, a scope identifier, and a suffix, for a maximum of 10 characters that can be illuminated in 1 of 3 colors. Rooms can be specified by numbers, short words, or abbreviations. Without the limitations of the VPS, formerly cryptic pages are now displayed in unambiguous text. Whereas “P888” in the VPS meant that the postanesthesia trust unit was full, this page is now displayed unambiguously on the CAPS as “PACU FULL.”

    When anesthesia and OR personnel hear the “new call” chime, they can glance at the parade and read the original call. If they miss seeing the original page, the system offers shortcuts so one does not necessity to watch utter the pages cycle through the display. Personnel indicators in the lower left corner of the parade (Fig. 5) identify the class of individual required (e.g., anesthesiologist, nurse, or technician). Zone indicators in the upper left corner of the parade identify the drudgery areas that absorb vigorous calls (e.g., “N” for north anesthesia and “B” for cardiovascular anesthesia). If an anesthesiologist liable for the B zone hears a original page chime but misses seeing the original page, the anesthesiologist can glance at the parade (Fig. 5) and celebrate that the original convene was for someone else (e.g., if only “D” is seen in the upper left of the display, only D zone personnel absorb vigorous pages). If “B” is in the upper left and if “A” is not in the lower left, then the anesthesiologist no longer needs to ogle at the parade because the original page was for someone else. Pages are sorted numerically within the zone, so people necessity to watch the parade only until the codes for their rooms are either displayed or passed over. The personnel and zone shortcut indicators are cumulative for utter vigorous pages and are displayed for utter except emergency pages.

    Postimplementation Review

    At Mayo Clinic, each of the two hospitals has a CAPS. During the first 6 mo of operation, there were 8 h of unexpected downtime. There were four additional hours of planned downtime for installing lower priority functions, downloading keypad corrections, installing operating system patches, and correcting heterogeneous problems. After this initial shake-down period, the CAPS was down a total of 14 min in 3 mo (i.e., 0.144 min/day). In contrast, the VPS was down an medium of 28.3, 29.7, 21.9, and 16.8 min/day in 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively. Starting in 2000, the reliability of the VPS began to deteriorate compared with its historic norms. The deterioration became another issue that helped initiate the CAPS project. Despite the difficulty of comparing used and original technologic systems, the data prove that the CAPS is more liable than was the VPS.

    Clinical Evaluation

    During the installation of the CAPS, there was a brief era during which neither the VPS nor the CAPS was available in utter areas. The VPS was removed in segments as the CAPS was installed, and beepers were used temporarily as a bridging communications medium. Anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists absorb used beepers for many years for person-to-person communications, such as consultations and outside telephone calls, and as a means to reach individuals when they are outside of the video paging environment (e.g., intensive trust units and hospital wards). Because departmental personnel were experienced and cozy with beepers and telephones are mounted on every anesthesia machine, it was decided to consume these devices during the transition from the VPS to the CAPS. This allowed comparison of the efficiency of using beepers with the efficiency of using the CAPS.

    Observations of paging with beepers occurred during a 4-day period, 2 days at each hospital. Each day, different ORs were studied on the basis of the implementation schedule of the CAPS. Data were gathered from within a randomly selected OR by recording the time a page was initiated to a beeper (beginning as the number was being dialed) and the time the responder entered the room. Because of the limitation of being able to celebrate only 1 OR at a time and the rapid installation of the CAPS, relatively few pages with beepers were observed (n = 12), utter of which were routine, nonurgent calls. When the study was designed, it was expected that there would be 6 days of installation per hospital and, therefore, 12 days of observation for gathering beeper response times. Unfortunately for the study, but fortuitous for the practice, installation took only 2 days per hospital, which reduced the expected number of observations. The original CAPS installation schedule allowed more time for system verification in each drudgery region than was actually needed and so the time allotted for beeper observations was significantly reduced.

    Similarly, observations for the CAPS occurred over a 4-day period, 2 days at each hospital. Data were gathered by recording the time a page appeared on the LED display, which was within 1.5 s of the time the button was pressed from within the OR, and the time the responder entered the room. Because the CAPS displays its pages on LED displays located throughout the surgical suite, several ORs could be observed simultaneously by watching the displays, and more data were collected (n = 57). No imperative or emergency pages were observed.

    The median response time for anesthesiologists paged with a beeper was 2.78 min (range, 1.00–7.23 min). Problem pages did occur, including incorrect beeper numbers that were given to next-shift personnel, multiple pages that were made because the caller was not unavoidable that the reform number had been dialed, and missed or ignored pages that required repaging. The median response times for anesthesiologists paged with the CAPS was 1.57 min (range, 0.30–7.20 min). Because of the CAPS design, zilch of the problem pages observed with the beepers were observed with the CAPS. These results are summarized in Table 2 and figure 6. A logarithmic transformation was applied to the data to meet the distributional assumptions required for the two-sample Student’s t-test. The t-test of the transformed data showed a statistically significant inequity between the response times with beepers and the response times with the CAPS (P = 0.021, t 67 = 2.36). The CAPS had a shorter response time for anesthesiologists than the beeper method.

    Table 2

    Table 2

    Figure 6

    Figure 6


    Mayo Clinic anesthesiologists generally are liable for more concurrent procedures than is common in an academic practice. For example, one anesthesiologist concurrently cares for two pediatric open-heart patients at Mayo Clinic, whereas the norm is one procedure per anesthesiologist at Duke and Stanford Universities (personal communication). Although there is no difficult evidence that the CAPS directly allows for higher concurrency, the anesthesiology department and the institution absorb concluded that the CAPS is an vital utensil that allows for these ratios with safe delivery of anesthesia care. The reasoning is that when an anesthesiologist is diligent caring for a patient in one location (e.g., placing a pulmonary artery catheter or inducing anesthesia) and is paged to another location, the page remains visible until it is answered. This prompts colleagues to respond the page, thereby ensuring that clinical problems are rapidly addressed. The system is used to argue cardiac arrests and other emergencies, initiating an immediate response from many available personnel. The system is besides used to page personnel in other services, such as the clinical laboratory, autotransfusion, surgical pathology, and housekeeping. By allowing communication with many groups, the CAPS can be used to manage procedural areas more efficiently.

    The design of the system is consistent with the communication philosophy that has developed at Mayo Clinic in both inpatient and outpatient environments. Patient trust sites are equipped with a communication utensil that identifies the state of the room. For the anesthesiology practice, the state of the scope reflects the personnel needs in the room. If an anesthesiologist is needed, a visual page is displayed throughout the drudgery environment informing both the anesthesiologist and the rehearse as a all that assistance is requested in the procedure room. The postimplementation review demonstrates that the CAPS is more liable than the system it replaced, with an medium downtime of less than one minute per day.

    When comparing the CAPS with a system of beepers, which are the yardstick communication devices in many medical centers, the time to respond a page was statistically significantly less when the page was initiated using the CAPS than using a beeper and the opportunity for communication errors are eliminated. This study has a number of limitations. The sample size of beeper paging is small (n = 12). However, they absorb no judgement to believe that these data are not representative of their beeper paging system. Also, although a statistically significant inequity in response time was detected between the beeper system and the CAPS, the clinical relevance of this inequity is unclear. The clinical relevance of 1.21 minutes response time depends on the clinical situation that prompted the page. If a page is initiated to dispute fluid management, it is unlikely that the observed shorter response time would compose any difference. However, if the page is to secure assistance for an airway-related problem, then 1.21 minutes could compose a significant difference.

    Another limitation of the study is that patient outcome data were not recorded as share of their data collection. utter the pages observed were for routine matters (e.g., anesthesia induction, emergence, or routine questions). No emergencies or imperative pages were recorded in either group. A review of the CAPS database shows that there were 7 emergency pages during April 2002 when the paging system covered 97 ORs, 5 recovery rooms, and >46 nonoperative anesthetizing locations. The emergency pages were answered in an medium of 35 ± 23 seconds. However, there are no data to compare this with emergency response to beeper pages. A much larger study would absorb to be undertaken to demonstrate an result on patient outcomes. Although such a study was considered, the anesthesiology rehearse concluded that it was unwilling to investigate the clinical result of paging without the CAPS because of concerns for patient safety and rehearse efficiency.

    The CAPS has a subtle result on the environment of the operating suite because there is not a constant din of overhead audio pages. Instead, a brief chime announces a original page to the entire staff. Anesthesiologists in the ORs are not straining to hear garbled pages. Anesthesiology residents and certified registered nurse anesthetists are not waiting in frustration, wondering whether their pages absorb been heard. Pages are persistently visible on ubiquitous displays until answered.

    Mayo Clinic is a great group rehearse (>1000 attending physicians), and it can be difficult to ensure accountability of utter members in a great organization (8). One drawback of using beepers is that staff may ignore or forget pages. With the CAPS, everyone in the procedural suites can behold pages and be vigilant of pages that are not answered. The primary value of Mayo Clinic is “the needs of the patient approach first.” Adherence to this principle encourages staff to respond to unanswered pages. However, even with assistance from colleagues, a continual pattern of ignoring pages becomes apparent. The CAPS promotes assistance from colleagues when a staff member is occupied with another patient and inhibits a pattern of unanswered pages in a manner not recognized by the anonymity of beepers. As a result, staff members are reluctant to absorb their pages displayed longer than necessary, even though there is no visible duration associated with any given page. The practice-wide result is that staff attend to the needs of patients in a timely manner without authoritarian management measures.

    The CAPS was designed to be a hands-free, reliable, and low-maintenance communication system. The system is more liable than the VPS it replaced. The evolution and installation of the CAPS is associated with anesthesiologists responding more rapidly to paging with the CAPS than to paging with beepers. This may be associated with improved patient outcomes and greater OR efficiency.

    References 1. Marrin CA, Johnson LC, Beggs VL, Batalden PB. Clinical process cost analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 690–4. 2. Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B, McDonald T. Where are the costs in perioperative care? Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 1138–44. 3. DeRiso B, Cantees K, Watkins WD. The operating rooms: cost hub management in a managed trust environment. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1995; 33: 133–50. 4. Abenstein JP, Warner MA. Anesthesia providers, patient outcomes, and costs. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 1273–83. 5. Silber JH, Sean KK, Even-Shoshan O, et al. Anesthesiologist direction and patient outcomes. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 152–63. 6. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Fish KJ. pass management in anesthesiology. original York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1994: 5–47. 7. Ereth MH, Byer DE, Behrens TL, Tri JL. Computer-based video paging [letter]. J Clin Monit 1989; 5: 217–9. 8. McMahon FB, McMahon JW. Psychology: the hybrid science. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press, 1982: 615–6. Attention Authors!

    Submit Your Papers Online

    You can now absorb your paper processed and reviewed faster by sending it to us through their new, web-based Rapid Review System.

    Submitting your manuscript online will connote that the time and expense of sending papers through the mail can be eliminated. Moreover, because their reviewers will besides be working online, the entire review process will be significantly faster.

    You can submit manuscripts electronically via There are links to this site from the Anesthesia & Analgesia website (, and the IARS website (

    To find out more about Rapid Review, travel to and click on “About Rapid Review.”

    © 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society Source

    Anesthesia & Analgesia97(1):196-204, July 2003.

    Related Videos

    Data is temporarily unavailable. delight try again soon.

    This website uses cookies. By continuing to consume this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. For information on cookies and how you can disable them visit their Privacy and Cookie Policy.

    Got it, thanks!

    The 'stuff' of the universe keeps changing | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Credit: CC0 Public Domain

    The composition of the universe—the elements that are the edifice blocks for every bit of matter—is ever-changing and ever-evolving, thanks to the lives and deaths of stars.

    An outline of how those elements configuration as stars grow and explode and fade and merge is detailed in a review article published Jan. 31 is the journal Science.

    "The universe went through some very keen changes, where utter of a sudden the sporadic table—the total number of elements in the universe—changed a lot," said Jennifer Johnson, a professor of astronomy at The Ohio state University and the article's author.

    "For 100 million years after the great Bang, there was nothing but hydrogen, helium and lithium. And then they started to deserve carbon and oxygen and really vital things. And now, we're kind of in the glory days of populating the sporadic table."

    The sporadic table has helped humans understand the elements of the universe since the 1860s, when a Russian chemist, Dmitri Mendeleev, recognized that unavoidable elements behaved the same way chemically, and organized them into a chart—the sporadic table.

    It is chemistry's way of organizing elements, helping scientists from elementary school to the world's best laboratories understand how materials around the universe approach together.

    The sources of elements in the Universe, from 15 minutes to 8 billion years. Credit: Jennifer Johnson The sources of elements in the Universe, from 15 minutes to 8 billion years. Credit: Jennifer Johnson The sources of elements in the Universe, from 15 minutes to 8 billion years. Credit: Jennifer Johnson The sources of elements in the Universe, from 15 minutes to 8 billion years. Credit: Jennifer Johnson But, as scientists absorb long known, the sporadic table is just made of stardust: Most elements on the sporadic table, from the lightest hydrogen to heavier elements like lawrencium, started in stars.

    The table has grown as original elements absorb been discovered—or in cases of synthetic elements, absorb been created in laboratories around the world—but the basics of Mendeleev's understanding of atomic weight and the edifice blocks of the universe absorb held true.

    Nucleosynthesis—the process of creating a original element—began with the great Bang, about 13.7 billion years ago. The lightest elements in the universe, hydrogen and helium, were besides the first, results of the great Bang. But heavier elements—just about every other element on the sporadic table—are largely the products of the lives and deaths of stars.

    Johnson said that high-mass stars, including some in the constellation Orion, about 1,300 light years from Earth, fuse elements much faster than low-mass stars. These grandiose stars fuse hydrogen and helium into carbon, and gyrate carbon into magnesium, sodium and neon. High-mass stars die by exploding into supernovae, releasing elements—from oxygen to silicon to selenium—into space around them.

    Smaller, low-mass stars—stars about the size of their own Sun—fuse hydrogen and helium together in their cores. That helium then fuses into carbon. When the small star dies, it leaves behind a white dwarf star. White dwarfs synthesize other elements when they merge and explode. An exploding white dwarf might ship calcium or iron into the abyss surrounding it. Merging neutron stars might create rhodium or xenon. And because, like humans, stars live and die on different time scales—and because different elements are produced as a star goes through its life and death—the composition of elements in the universe besides changes over time.

    "One of the things I like most about this is how it takes several different processes for stars to compose elements and these processes are interestingly distributed across the sporadic table," Johnson said. "When they mediate of utter the elements in the universe, it is keen to mediate about how many stars gave their lives—and not just high-mass stars blowing up into supernovae. It's besides some stars like their Sun, and older stars. It takes a nice diminutive compass of stars to give us elements."

    Explore further: UNESCO celebrates 150 years of chemistry's sporadic table

    More information: Jennifer A. Johnson, Populating the sporadic table: Nucleosynthesis of the elements, Science (2019). DOI: 10.1126/science.aau9540

    Journal reference: Science

    Provided by: The Ohio state University

    The 2013 Virtualization Review Reader's preference Awards | real questions and Pass4sure dumps


    The 2013 Virtualization Review Reader's preference Awards

    A usher to the best companies and products in the virtualization market.

  • By Bruce Hoard
  • 01/01/2013
  • It's that time of year again when I absorb the joy of welcoming you to the combined 2013 Virtualization Review Reader's preference Awards and Ultimate Buyer's usher issue. This is where you can check out the prodigious -- and rapidly growing -- array of virtualization and cloud products that are available to meet your specific needs.

    When I converse prodigious and growing, I'm talking about substantially increasing their numbers from last year, when they included 274 products from 177 companies. This year, in addition to adding four original cloud categories, they dug profound and raised the bar to 466 products and 412 companies.

    In the Reader's preference Awards (RCAs) voting results (see "Methodology,"), VMware Inc. came through with yet another tough performance, taking home six RCAs and one Preferred Product award among the 16 categories. Citrix Systems Inc. ran a tough second to VMware, winning two RCAs and six Preferred Product awards, while Cisco Systems Inc. registered two RCAs and one Preferred Product award. Microsoft garnered five Preferred Product awards, while other Preferred Product/Editor's preference award winners embrace Amazon Web Services LLC, Quest Software, Symantec Corp. and Veeam Software.

    Insofar as the Ultimate Buyer's usher is concerned, as you can behold from the amount of products they included, they spared no endeavor in their pursuit of the maximum number of products and companies that are germane to the virtualization universe. They hope you Enjoy this sumptuous feast and find it as useful as it is comprehensive. I welcome your feedback with ideas on how they can compose this issue even better next year. You can contact me at

    Application VirtualizationVMware wins the Reader's preference Award for the third straight year in this hotly contested category that pits the market leader against Citrix and its many years of application tang baked into XenApp. Citrix does win the Preferred Product award here, while the second Preferred Product award goes to Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V), which makes a tough showing in this category for the second year in a row. Rounding things out, the Editor's preference award goes to Symantec Workspace Virtualization, which reduces application conflicts, testing requirements and support calls while helping IT organizations help management and control over endpoints.

    RCA WinnerVMware ThinApp - VMware Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductCitrix XenApp 6.5 - Citrix Systems Inc.Standalone pricing starts at $350 per concurrent user and includes one year of Subscription Advantage. XenApp is besides included in XenDesktop Enterprise or Platinum -

    Preferred ProductMicrosoft Application Virtualization (App-V) - Microsoft Corp.Call for price -

    Editor's ChoiceSymantec Workspace Virtualization 6.1 SP8 - Symantec Corp.$44 per node -

    Server VirtualizationSomeplace very torrid is likely to freeze over before anyone knocks VMware vSphere 5.0 off its well-earned -- and predominant -- perch in this category, from which it wins the RCA. Still, Microsoft Windows Server Hyper-V, which garnered a Preferred Product award, has transitioned from a gathering storm to a major force as it rides a powerful and still-growing wave of popularity in this most venerable of virtualization markets. The second Preferred Product award goes to Citrix XenServer, a trusty survivor that's available via a free download. The free, open source Oracle VM gets the Editor's preference award.

    RCA WinnervSphere 5.0 - VMware Inc.VMware vSphere yardstick starts at $995 for one processor -

    Preferred ProductWindows Server 2012 Hyper-V - MicrosoftSee for licensing details -

    Preferred ProductCitrix XenServer 6.0 - Citrix Systems Inc.Pricing ranges from free to $1,000 per server for the Advanced Edition; $2,500 per server for the Enterprise Edition; and $5,000 per server for the Platinum Edition -

    Editor's ChoiceOracle VM - Oracle Corp.Oracle VM has no license fee, only a support fee -

    Desktop Virtualization & VDIThe RCA Winner and silent champion: VMware View. Citrix can't be gay about this, and is no doubt tired of being a runner-up to VMware in this category -- a category that's silent trying to achieve meaningful liftoff. Citrix wins two consolation prizes in the configuration of Preferred Product awards for XenDesktop and VDI-in-a-Box. The Editor's preference award goes to Quest Workspace Desktop Virtualization, which only makes Dell ogle better and better as it continues to acquire value-adding companies.

    RCA WinnerVMware View 5.1- VMware Inc.$1,815 for VMware View 5 Enterprise Bundle: Starter kit plus basic (12x5) one-year support -

    Preferred ProductCitrix XenDesktop 5.6 - Citrix Systems Inc.VDI Edition, $95 per user or device, $195 per concurrent user; Enterprise Edition, $225 per user or device; Platinum Edition, $350 per user or device -

    Preferred ProductCitrix VDI-in-a-Box 5.1 - Citrix Systems Inc.Perpetual license $160; annual license $55; software maintenance $35 per year -

    Editor's ChoiceQuest Workspace Desktop Virtualization 7.6 - Quest Software, a Division of Dell Inc.Desktop Edition starts at $99; VDI only sold per concurrent user -

    Mobile Virtualization & Bring Your Own DeviceCitrix breaks through for its first RCA win in this category with its mobility lynchpin, Citrix Receiver, a free, downloadable piece of client software that enables users to access their docs, apps and desktops from any device, including smartphones, tablets and PCs. VMware cops a Preferred Product award for Horizon Application Manager, which unifies numerous VMware and competing technologies, while Microsoft takes home the second Preferred Product award with System hub Configuration Manager. The Editor's preference award goes to 2X Software 2X Client for RDP/Remote Desktop, which connects to home or office PCs from any desktop, laptop or mobile device.

    RCA WinnerCitrix Receiver - Citrix Systems Inc.Free with Citrix XenDesktop, Citrix XenApp and Citrix CloudGateway -

    Preferred ProductHorizon Application Manager 1.5 - VMware Inc.$726 for Perpetual Bundle: 10-pack plus basic (12x5) one-year support -

    Preferred ProductSystem hub 2012 Configuration Manager - MicrosoftGo to for pricing and licensing details -

    Editor's Choice2X Client for RDP/Remote Desktop - 2X SoftwareFree -

    Thin-Client & Zero-Client ComputingThe Dell acquisitions of Wyse and Quest absorb dramatically expanded Dell's reach into client computing. This is directly reflected in the Dell RCA conquest for the Wyse T10 product and Quest's Preferred Product award for its Quest Workspace Desktop Virtualization ThinShell product, an application designed to replace the Microsoft Windows shell and provide a better logon tang for users. Teradici, best known for its PCoIP drudgery with VMware View, takes home the second Preferred Product award for its PCoIP Zero Clients. The Editor's preference award is captured by Devon IT DeTOS Terminal Operating System, a Linux-based OS that links multiple servers running multifarious protocols.

    RCA WinnerDell Wyse T10 1 - Dell WyseStarts at $299 for Ethernet; $349 with integrated wireless -

    Preferred ProductQuest Workspace Desktop Virtualization ThinShell 2.5 - Quest Software, a Division of Dell Inc.Free for Quest Workspace Desktop Virtualization customers -

    Preferred ProductPCoIP Zero Clients 1.7.1 - Teradici Corp.Starts from $299 -

    Editor's ChoiceDevon Terminal Operating System - Devon ITCall for price -

    Virtualization Management & OptimizationThe RCA for this capacious category is won by VMware vCenter Operations Management Suite in a iterate of last year's performance. The stately vCenter delivers integrated performance, capacity and configuration management capabilities for vSphere, physical and hybrid cloud environments. Despite its prominence, however, vCenter is emotion some heat from Preferred Product winner Microsoft System Center, which has grown significantly in stature during the past year. Cisco Systems wins the second Preferred Product award in this category via its Virtual Network Management hub product, while the Editor's preference award is bestowed upon Veeam Software in reverence of its multitasking Veeam ONE for VMware and Hyper-V.

    RCA WinnervCenter Operations Management Suite 5.0 - VMware Inc.Standard Edition starts at $1,250 per 25-VM pack -

    Preferred ProductSystem hub 2012 - MicrosoftOpen No flush (NL) License and Software Assurance two-year price for the yardstick Edition is $1,323; Datacenter Edition is $3,607; more pricing information is available at -

    Preferred ProductVirtual Network Management hub 1.3 - Cisco Systems Inc.Call for price -

    Editor's ChoiceVeeam ONE for VMware and Hyper-V 6 - Veeam Software$450 per socket; besides available in a Free Edition -

    Cloud Infrastructure & PlatformIn a high-profile, VMware-Microsoft matchup, VMware wins the RCA conquest here with Cloud Foundry, edging out Preferred Product award winner and early Platform as a Service (PaaS) competitor Windows Azure. Citrix besides wins a Preferred Product award with Citrix CloudPlatform, its "cloud orchestration system" based on Apache CloudStack. Veteran cloud provider Amazon Web Services gets the Editor's preference nod for its long-standing Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2).

    RCA WinnerCloud Foundry - VMware Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductWindows Azure - MicrosoftSee for purchase options and pricing information -

    Preferred ProductCitrix CloudPlatform - Citrix Systems Inc.Call for price -

    Editor's ChoiceAmazon Elastic Compute Cloud - Amazon Web Services LLCCall for price -

    Cloud StorageRCA Winner Dropbox is getting at least as much attention for its corporate misuses as it has for its intended uses. Either way, it has made a lasting repercussion on IT users and IT organizations. Amazon Web Services picks up one Preferred Product award here with its user- and developer-friendly Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), while the EMC Atmos cloud delivery platform takes the other, based on its cost-efficient scaling capabilities. The Editor's preference award goes to relative newcomer NexGen Storage for its n5 Storage System, an innovative SAN for midsize organizations.

    RCA WinnerDropbox - DropboxFree edition from 2GB to 18GB; Pro Edition starts at $9.99 per month for 100GB, 200GB or 500GB plans; Team Edition plans start at 1TB for five users, convene for price -

    Preferred ProductAmazon Simple Storage Service - Amazon Web Services LLCCall for price -

    Preferred ProductAtmos - EMC Corp.Call for price -

    Editor's Choicen5 Storage System -  NexGen Storage Inc.$55,000 -

    Cloud SecurityTrend Micro SecureCloud takes home the RCA Winner in this all-important category by protecting public and private clouds -- as well as vSphere environments. It can be deployed as a hosted service or an on-premises software app. Symantec receives a Preferred Product award for its O3 Cloud Identity and Access Control product, which provides a single, secure access point to numerous cloud and Web apps and services. McAfee Cloud Security wins the second Preferred Product award by enabling businesses to extend and apply their own access and security policies into the cloud. The Editor's preference winner here is Check Point Software Technologies and its affordable (starting at $19 per month) Check Point SMB Cloud-Managed Security Service.

    RCA WinnerSecureCloud - Trend Micro Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductSymantec O3 Cloud Identity and Access Control - Symantec Corp.            Price is based on hardware appliances or service subscriptions on a per-user schedule -

    Preferred ProductMcAfee Cloud Security - McAfeeCall for price -

    Editor's ChoiceCheck Point SMB Cloud-Managed Security Services - Check Point Software Technologies Inc.Starts at $19 per month -

    Cloud SoftwareChalk up another RCA win for Citrix via ShareFile, its cloud-based data storage, sharing and collaboration product that dovetails with the company's "personal cloud" mentality. Preferred Product award winner No. 1 is the IaaS Cloud Manager offering from NetIQ. Preferred Product award winner No. 2 is Fusion Tables from Google, which enables users to visualize data via various lifelike means. Puppet Enterprise, from Puppet Labs, is the Editor's preference award winner, and has collected kudos for simply managing physical, virtual and cloud-based systems.

    RCA WinnerShareFile - Citrix Systems Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductCloud Manager 2 - NetIQ Corp.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductFusion Tables - Google Inc.Call for price -

    Editor's ChoicePuppet Enterprise - Puppet LabsCall for price -

    Business ContinuityIn a faultfinding category such as this, you anticipate a company such as VMware to compete strongly, which is what it does with vCenter Site Recovery Manager, winning the RCA. It builds on vSphere Replication and requires vCenter Server to power its assortment of recovery capabilities. Always tough in this category, Veeam takes home a Preferred Product award for Veeam Backup & Replication, which is now at version 6.5. besides copping a Preferred Product award is IBM Tivoli Manager, touted by IBM for its centralized, policy-based, enterprise-class data backup and recovery prowess. Acronis earns the Editor's preference award with its Acronis Backup & Recovery product that works with companies of utter sizes.

    RCA WinnervCenter Site Recovery Manager 5.0 - VMware Inc.Standard Edition pricing starts at $195 per VM - http://vmware.comPreferred ProductVeeam Backup & Replication 6.1 - Veeam SoftwareStarts at $699 per CPU socket and includes first-year maintenance; pricing is the same for VMware and Hyper-V, and customers can swap licenses between hypervisors at no saturate -

    Preferred ProductIBM Tivoli Storage Manager - IBM Corp.Call for price -

    Editor's ChoiceAcronis Backup & Recovery 11 - Acronis Inc.$1,799 per server -

    Virtualization AutomationVirtualization automation is something of a Holy Grail that has yet to be fully realized, but BMC VaraLogix wins the RCA for this category with its VaraLogix Q product that adds a stimulus to the DevOps movement. ManageIQ wins a Preferred Product award with EVM Automate and its multiplicitous automation features, while Reflex Systems does the same with vProfile. rPath closes out this category with the Editor's preference award for rPath Cloud Engine, which is IaaS-to-PaaS conversion software for cloud stack vendors and services providers.

    RCA WinnerVaraLogix Q - BMC VaraLogixCall for price -

    Preferred ProductEVM Automate - ManageIQCall for price -

    Preferred ProductvProfile 3.3 - Reflex Systems LLCPricing is about $595 per socket -

    Editor's ChoicerPath Cloud Engine - rPathCall for price -

    JAMS - MVP Systems Software Inc.Call for price -

    UC4 Automation Engine - UC4 SoftwareCall for price -

    Storage VirtualizationStorage is increasingly playing a front-and-center role in virtualization environments, and RCA Winner NetApp is carving out market share with its NetApp V-Series Open Storage Controller by enhancing the value of legacy storage systems without forklift upgrades. The venerable Brocade wins a Preferred Product award for its DCX 8510 Backbones, while Hitachi Data Systems Virtual Storage Platform (VSP) 1 takes the other Preferred Product award for its compatibility with a wide compass of products. The Editor's preference award goes to the Tintri VMstore T540 Storage Appliance and its beefed-up glance capacity.

    RCA WinnerNetApp V-Series (V6200 Series/V3200 Series) Open Storage Controller - NetAppCall for price -

    Preferred ProductDCX 8510 Backbones - Brocade Communications Systems Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductHitachi Virtual Storage Platform (VSP) 1 - Hitachi Data Systems Corp.Starts at $232,000 for a solitary Hitachi Virtual Storage Director pair controller with 16 FC host ports, 48GB of cache, no disk capacity and basic OS software -

    Editor's ChoiceTintri VMstore T540 Storage Appliance with Tintri OS 1.4 - Tintri Inc.Up to 1,000 VMs on a solitary storage appliance, convene for price -

    Network VirtualizationNetworking technology is faultfinding to future virtual, cloud-based datacenters, and it comes as no amaze that Cisco wins the RCA in this category on the technological strength of its Nexus 1000V Virtual Switches. The Citrix NetScaler SDX family of virtual appliances builds on NetScaler's well-established technical networking chops to select a Preferred Product award here, and Riverbed besides wins a Preferred Product award for its Steelhead appliances that drive WAN optimization. BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager Virtual Edition from F5 Networks captures the Editor's preference award.

    RCA WinnerNexus 1000V Virtual Switch 1.5.1a - Cisco Systems Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductCitrix NetScaler SDX - Citrix Systems Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductSteelhead Appliances - Riverbed TechnologyCall for price -

    Editor's ChoiceBIG-IP Local Traffic Manager Virtual Edition 11.2 - F5 Networks Inc.$7,995 -

    Virtualization SecurityThis is a top-of-mind topic as virtualization becomes ever more pervasive. Cisco is the RCA Winner here with its Cisco Virtual Security Gateway for Nexus 1000V chain Virtual Switch, a virtual appliance that delivers security and compliance for virtual computing environments. The first Preferred Product award goes to Trend Micro profound Security, which works in physical, virtual and cloud environments. The second Preferred Product award belongs to Symantec Endpoint Protection, which is a powerful antivirus endpoint software. Kaspersky Lab, in trade since 1997, wins the Editor's preference award for its Kaspersky Security for Virtualization product.

    RCA WinnerCisco Virtual Security Gateway 1.3.1 for Nexus 1000V chain Virtual Switch - Cisco Systems Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductDeep Security 8 - Trend Micro Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductSymantec Endpoint Protection 12.1 - Symantec Corp.$30.96 to $54.18 per user license with discounts for volume and multi-year purchase -

    Editor's ChoiceKaspersky Security for Virtualization - Kaspersky Lab ZAOCall for price -

    Virtualization TrainingThe require for virtualization training is only going up as virtualization becomes more sophisticated and integrated with cloud and other core datacenter technologies. Based on its efforts in this area, Global erudition Training LLC Cloud Computing Courses is the RCA Winner, followed by Preferred Product award winners TrainSignal with its VMware Video Training Library, and NetCom Learning with its Microsoft Technical Certification Training. vehement School and InfoSec Institute takes the Editor's preference award for its IT Security Training and Certification Boot Camp.

    RCA WinnerCloud Computing Courses - Global erudition Training LLCCall for price -

    Preferred ProductVMware Video Training Library - TrainSignal Inc.Call for price -

    Preferred ProductMicrosoft Technical Certification Training - NetCom LearningCall for price -

    Editor's ChoiceIT Security Training and Certification Boot Camp - vehement School and InfoSec InstituteCall for price -

    Hatsize 3.13 - Hatsize Corp.Pay-as-you-Go starts at $40 per day; Reserve-and-Grow flat-fee model; subscription -

    Virtualization Courses - Learn iT!See Web site or convene for price -

    About the Author

    Bruce Hoard is the original editor of Virtualization Review. Prior to taking this post, he was founding editor of Network World and spent 20 years as a freelance writer and editor in the IT industry.

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    Issu :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    RSS Feed : : : :

    Back to Main Page | |