BH0-007 real questions | Pass4sure BH0-007 real questions |

Pass4sure BH0-007 dumps | BH0-007 true questions |

BH0-007 ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing

Study sheperd Prepared by ISEB Dumps Experts BH0-007 Dumps and true Questions

100% true Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

BH0-007 exam Dumps Source : ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing

Test Code : BH0-007
Test denomination : ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing
Vendor denomination : ISEB
real questions : 25 true Questions

That was incredible! I got actual test questions contemporary BH0-007 examination.
I prepared the BH0-007 exam with the assist of ISEB check instruction dump. it turned into complicated however typical very useful in passing my BH0-007 exam.

what's simplest manner to prepare and pass BH0-007 exam? had enabled a pleasant luxuriatein the all at the identical time as I used BH0-007 prep aid from it. I followed the study guides, exam engine and, the BH0-007 to every tiniest shrimp element. It changed into because of such gorgeous manner that I contain become expert inside the BH0-007 exam curriculum in depend of days and were given the BH0-007 certification with a terrific marks. I am so grateful to every single individual behind the platform.

am i able to find state-of-the-art dumps Q & A brand recent BH0-007 exam?
I could doubtlessly recommend it to my partners and accomplices. I got 360 of imprints. I was once enchanted with the effects I got with the assist examine manual BH0-007 exam path material. I usually concept suitable and extensive research were the reaction to eachandevery or any tests, till I took the succor of brain sell off to skip my exam BH0-007. Extremely fulfill.

want something snappily making ready for BH0-007.
I am going to proffer the BH0-007 test now, ultimately I felt the self assurance because of BH0-007 Preparation. If I checked out my past on every occasion I willing to proffer the tests were given fearful, I realize its laughable but now I am amazed why I felt no confidence on my, antecedent is lack of BH0-007 Preparation, Now I am completely prepared can passed my test effortlessly, so if eachandevery of us of you felt low confidence just regain registered with the and initiate training, subsequently you felt self assurance.

were given no problem! 3 days practise brand recent BH0-007 actual assume a explore at questions is needed.
I am ranked very high among my magnificence pals on the list of terrific students however it simplest came about after I registered on this for a few exam assist. It become the extravagant marks reading application on this that helped me in becoming a member of the extravagant ranks at the side of different mighty college students of my elegance. The assets in this are commendable because theyre precise and extremely beneficial for education via BH0-007 pdf, BH0-007 dumps and BH0-007 books. I am ecstatic to jot down these phrases of appreciation due to the fact this deserves it. Thank you.

found maximum BH0-007 Questions in true exam that I prepared.
I gave the BH0-007 exercise questions most efficacious as quickly as in advance than I enrolled for turning into a member of the software. I did no longer contain achievement even after giving my adequate of time to my studies. I did no longer realize wherein i lacked in getting fulfillment. But after turning into a member of i were given my reply become missing grow to live BH0-007 prep books. It placed eachandevery of the matters in the privilege guidelines. Making geared up for BH0-007 with BH0-007 sample questions is genuinely convincing. BH0-007 Prep Books of different classes that i had did succor me as they had been not enough succesful for clearing the BH0-007 questions. They contain been tough in verity they did no longer cowl the complete syllabus of BH0-007. But designed books are virtually top class.

it's miles unbelieveable, but BH0-007 today's dumps are availabe privilege here.
BH0-007 questions from are excellent, and mirror exactly what test focus gives you at the BH0-007 exam. I loved everything about the preparation material. I passed with over 80%.

real exam questions of BH0-007 exam! Awesome Source.
Found out this top supply after a long time. Everyone privilege here is cooperative and in a position. Team provided me superb material for BH0-007 guidance.

Need to-the-point knowledge of BH0-007 topics!
each topic and vicinity, every situation, BH0-007 material had been notable assist for me while getting ready for this exam and actually doing it! i was frightened, however going back to this BH0-007 true questions and questioning that I recognise the entirety due to the fact the BH0-007 exam changed into very cleanly after the stuff, I got an excellent halt result. Now, doing the following stage of ISEB certifications.

Can I find dumps Q & A of BH0-007 exam?
I wound up the exam with a fulfilling eighty four% marks in stipulated time. Thank you very a super deal killexams. Through and thru, it contain become hard to finish pinnacle to backside test intending with a complete-time work. At that factor, I grew to circle out to live to the true questions of killexams. Its concise solutions helped me to explore some intricate topics. I decided on to sit down down for the exam BH0-007 to capitalize further evolution in my profession.

ISEB ISEB Intermediate Certificate in

ISEB Practitioner commerce and solution structure | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

This seller-specific Certification is obtainable by means of:British computing device Society (BCS)Swindon, Se UKPhone: forty four (0)1793 417417

skill stage: advanced                          fame: active

reasonable: now not attainable               

summary:For enterprise and solution Architects who drill their intermediate stage knowledge to a case examine and might intricate on the organisation and tactics required to exploit an architecture correctly. This certification is apropos for people that are engaged in any aspect of enterprise and solution architecture.

preliminary necessities:You ought to pass the ISEB Practitioner in commerce and solution structure exam. The exam has a one hour closing date and carries forty assorted-choice questions according to a case analyze. A passing ranking of 26/forty is required.Six years of IS/IT labor event, together with some architecture definition is advised. it is additionally suggested you dangle the ISEB Intermediate degree certificate, or contain studied the ISEB Intermediate degree Syllabus and Reference mannequin, and contain both TOGAF 8 or TOGAF 9 flush 2 certificate. practicing is attainable however now not required.

carrying on with necessities:None certain

See eachandevery British computer Society Certifications

dealer's page for this certification

e-checking out Brings ISEB courses In India | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

From March 2005 e-testing, one of the most UK’s main independent utility trying out consultancy organisations will now carry the ISEB groundwork and Practitioner utility trying out Certification classes in India.

“there's a growing to live hobby in British permitted training programmes in India. And what they exigency to present is a highly alluring, universally identified ISEB utility trying out qualification - now a twin certification with the ISTQB accreditation,” says David Rai, earnings and advertising director, e-checking out.

Rai knows organizations’ growing to live awareness of the inherent hazards connected to relocating labor offshore and the deserve to ply provider problems is neatly documented. He believes that an offshore ISEB licensed testing group offers clients the reassurance that labor can live produced to the required standard.

“ISEB certification capacity corporations stand a higher possibility of positioning their productsand services within the global industry and the British typical is really held in high admiration within the European market,” introduced Rai.

e-trying out is the first UK certified training issuer, accepted via the British desktop commerce (BCS), to carry the three-day ISEB groundwork and ten-day Practitioner utility testing Certification lessons in India.

And after three years of running the main software testing basis course in the UK and Europe, e-trying out’s track list thus far suggests a 95% swagger fee.

The three-day direction may live delivered in quite a lot of places across India and carried out by course of ISEB certified trainers. locations include: Mumbai, recent Delhi, Pune, Chennai and Bangalore.

TietoEnator Certifies Testers | true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

January 14, 2002 08:28 ET | supply: TietoEnator

ESPOO, Finland, Jan. 14, 2002 (PRIMEZONE) -- TietoEnator is one of two Swedish companies authorized to certify testers in line with the ISEB basis certificate for software testing. The ISEB explore at various training may live offered in Sweden and Norway from January.

TietoEnator has its personal examine academics and presents the course to customers and personnel. it is a three-day direction, and on the conclusion of day three the contributors can resolve to assume an examination and regain the ISEB-certification.

- they contain observed an increasing exact for licensed testers, and considering the fact that there is not any Swedish medium for test, they contain chosen to deliver the ISEB groundwork certificates, says Thomas Klarbrant, Managing Director of TietoEnator examine solutions.

ISEB (tips techniques Examination Board) is a division within BCS (British laptop Society). ISEB presents certifications inside several distinctive IT areas. The purpose of ISEB is to raise the necessities within the IT company and to assist competence construction.

For extra suggestions, gratify contact: Kennet Osbjer, TietoEnator test solutions, Sweden, +46 706 24 65 33 Marit Saelemyr, TietoEnator Consulting AS, Norway, +47 553 64468

With over 10,000 personnel and annual net income of EUR 1.1 billion, TietoEnator is a number one service provider of extravagant price-delivered IT capabilities in Europe. TietoEnator makes a speciality of consulting, pile and hosting its valued clientele' commerce operations within the digital economic climate. The neighborhood's functions are in response to a combination of abysmal industry-certain talents and latest counsel expertise.

TIETOENATOR organization

DISTRIBUTION major media

This information became dropped at you by course of Waymaker

TietoEnator, Espoo TietoEnator verify solutions, Sweden: Kennet Osbjer +46 706 24 sixty five 33 TietoEnator Consulting AS, Norwa: Marit Saelemyr +47 553 64468


TietoEnator, Espoo TietoEnator test options, Sweden: Kennet Osbjer +forty six 706 24 sixty five 33 TietoEnator Consulting AS, Norwa: Marit Saelemyr +47 553 64468

While it is hard errand to pick solid certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals regain sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets as for exam dumps update and validity. The greater portion of other's sham report objection customers approach to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams cheerfully and effortlessly. They never compact on their review, reputation and property because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer certitude is imperative to us. Extraordinarily they deal with review, reputation, sham report grievance, trust, validity, report and scam. On the off random that you observe any incorrect report posted by their rivals with the denomination killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, protestation or something relish this, simply recollect there are constantly terrible individuals harming reputation of splendid administrations because of their advantages. There are a mighty many fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams true questions questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their sample questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Brain dumps Menu

9A0-279 sample test | 000-602 bootcamp | 190-531 drill questions | 9A0-803 drill test | 9A0-084 brain dumps | PEGACSA72V1 exam questions | HP0-T21 dump | HP0-714 questions and answers | HP2-E45 examcollection | HP2-K27 free pdf download | CPM VCE | 9L0-504 cheat sheets | 1Z0-546 questions answers | 70-333 test prep | HH0-200 true questions | PR2F test prep | AZ-101 drill test | 650-667 exam prep | 2B0-202 brain dumps | UM0-401 true questions |

Kill your BH0-007 exam at first attempt! exam braindumps offers eachandevery of you that you exigency to assume certification exam. Their ISEB BH0-007 Exam will provide you with exam questions with confirmed answers that replicate the true exam. They at are made plans to empower you to pass your BH0-007 exam with extravagant ratings.

ISEB BH0-007 exam has given another presence to the IT enterprise. It is presently needed to certify beAs the qualification that prompts a brighter future. You wish to location mighty endeavor in ISEB ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing test, in fine of the actual fact that there will live no escape out of poring over. contain created and excellent way, currently your test preparing for BH0-007 ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing is not violent from now on. Click Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for eachandevery exams on website PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for eachandevery Orders As, the will live a stable and dependable qualification furnishes BH0-007 exam questions with 100 percent pass guarantee. you wish to hone questions for a minimum of one day to attain well within the BH0-007 test. Your true expertise to success in BH0-007 exam, certain enough starts offevolved with BH0-007 test questions that's the astonishing and examined wellspring of your focused on perform. contain their specialists Team to guarantee their ISEB BH0-007 exam questions are reliably the most updated. They are at the entire exceptionally acquainted with the exams and testing awareness.

How withhold up ISEB BH0-007 exams updated?: they contain their phenomenal methods to realize the most extreme late exams insights on ISEB BH0-007. Presently after which they contact their associates who're particularly unexcited with the exam simulator acknowledgment or sometimes their clients will email us the latest update, or they were given the most current update from their dumps bearers. When they find the ISEB BH0-007 exams changed then they update them ASAP.

On the off prep that you sincerely approach up speedy this BH0-007 ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing and might pick never again to sit taut for the updates then they will give you complete refund. notwithstanding, you ought to forward your score reply to us with the objective that they will contain an exam. They will give you complete refund brisk during their working time when they regain the ISEB BH0-007 score archive from you.

ISEB BH0-007 ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing Product Demo?: they contain both PDF version and Testing Software. You can examin their particular site page to observe what no doubt like.

Exactly when will I regain my BH0-007 fabric once I pay?: Generally, After efficacious installment, your username/password are sent at your email reconcile to inside 5 min. It might likewise assume minimal longer on the off random that your answers retard in control approval. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for eachandevery exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for eachandevery Orders

BH0-007 Practice Test | BH0-007 examcollection | BH0-007 VCE | BH0-007 study guide | BH0-007 practice exam | BH0-007 cram

Killexams HP2-Z26 mock exam | Killexams 310-876 cheat sheets | Killexams HP5-H01D drill questions | Killexams C9050-042 braindumps | Killexams C2010-506 brain dumps | Killexams 300-209 test prep | Killexams 250-504 braindumps | Killexams 00M-195 free pdf download | Killexams 7230X examcollection | Killexams 000-M227 exam prep | Killexams 000-765 study guide | Killexams 000-M30 study guide | Killexams 650-126 questions answers | Killexams LE0-628 drill test | Killexams 9A0-088 true questions | Killexams 920-551 questions and answers | Killexams 1T6-215 true questions | Killexams HP0-752 questions and answers | Killexams HP5-H04D pdf download | Killexams 400-051 free pdf |

Exam Simulator : Pass4sure BH0-007 VCE Exam Simulator

View Complete list of Brain dumps

Killexams 9L0-622 drill test | Killexams 300-101 study guide | Killexams 190-755 drill exam | Killexams VCS-254 free pdf | Killexams 000-218 test questions | Killexams HP0-J39 study guide | Killexams 190-981 dumps questions | Killexams 1Z0-807 free pdf | Killexams 642-164 test prep | Killexams 1Y0-A04 cheat sheets | Killexams F50-533 brain dumps | Killexams 00M-232 questions and answers | Killexams 000-371 drill Test | Killexams 646-058 test prep | Killexams 700-295 dump | Killexams 000-533 dumps | Killexams C9020-568 free pdf | Killexams M6040-419 examcollection | Killexams 1Z0-877 drill test | Killexams EE2-181 drill questions |

ISEB Intermediate Certificate in Software Testing

Pass 4 certain BH0-007 dumps | BH0-007 true questions |

SSL certificate revocation and how it is broken in drill | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

The Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) is the software system that allows to sign, validate certificate, withhold a list of revoked certificates, ration CA public key. The goal of PKI is to enable secure communication among parties who contain never met before.

The most common exhaust case of the PKI are myriad of the websites secured with TLS/HTTPS and using SSL certificates to establish confidence for particular domain name(s) and authenticate the server side. Once the certificate is signed by the CA (certificate authority), it remains telling for a specific duration. When it’s about to expire, usually you renew it or buy a recent one. But sometimes you exigency to revoke a certificate beforehand, usually due to a private key compromise.

Certificate revocation is a process of invalidating an issued SSL certificate. Ideally, browsers and other clients should live able to detect that the certificate is revoked in timely manner, pointto the security warning, that certificate is no longer trusted, and avert user from further consuming such a website.

Let’s explore various approaches to address certificate revocation.

Certificate Revocation Lists (CRL)

Original design was for CAs to manage and publish lists of revoked certificates, so browser/clients can download them and compare against to check for certificate status. This worked mighty in the past when there were few websites and certificates, but given today’s scale of the Internet, it’s practically infeasible for CA to manage and for client to download these huge lists, whenever they exigency to check for revocation status.

CRL architecture introduces the dependency between client and CA infrastructure, making it prone to the CA server’s availability issues and downtimes.

Nowadays original CRLs are effectively ignored by just halt clients.

Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP)

OCSP is an improvement to CRL and is a protocol for checking if a SSL certificate has been revoked. Instead of client downloading the complete stout list of revoked certificates, it can just submit a request to a CA server, that returns a signed response with certificate current status. OCSP is much lightweight, as only one record is retrieved at a time, and it can provide more accurate information, as contrary to CRLs lists, which are downloaded and cached on a client for some time.

Still, it suffers from many issues:

  • Additional dependency and query between client and CA servers during TLS handshake, that adds up latency.
  • Poor, unreliable CA infrastructure. prone to availability problems. The CA servers are targets for DoS attacks. unhurried OCSP response adds up latency too.
  • Privacy compromise. Browser leaks what website is being accessed and who accesses it to CA servers.
  • Soft-fail behavior

    Given dependency to penniless and not-reliable CA infrastructure, browsers/clients usually mind to exhaust soft-fail (ignore) behavior, when they don’t receive OCSP response in a timely manner or encounter some errors, assuming that certificate is telling and allowing to access the website. Some browsers just pointto warning, that user can bypass. Chrome, for example, does not exhaust OCSP at all, and exhaust its own proprietary mechanism, called CRLSet. The reason for such soft-fail deportment is because unavailable CA servers should not obstruct access to eachandevery websites, using their certificates.

    Soft-fail deportment gives us incorrect sense of security — it’s OK when you regain revocation warning, but when you don’t — you’re in doubt if cert is telling indeed or if there is an OSCP infrastructure related issue. For example, attacker can obstruct OCSP traffic and antecedent revocation checks to pass.

    Here is firefox reaction with SEC_ERROR_REVOKED_CERTIFICATE mistake when it gets revoked status from OCSP responder.

    Firefox and revoked certificate

    Chrome does not exhaust OSCP at all, saw cert is OK with a green “secure” badge, but if you dig a bit deeper, it tells certificate is revoked 😕

    Chrome and revoked certificate

    Right now there is no dependable course to switch to hard-fail behavior. Essentially, revocation is broken. There are yoke of attempts to address this issue, relish proprietary mechanism (Chrome CLRSet, Firefox OneCRL) or OSCP must-staple extensions, but there is noiseless no 100% working solution.

    OCSP Stapling

    OSCP Stapling moves the querying of the OCSP server from the client to the https server. The https server periodically polls OCSP server for revocation status of its own certificate(s), and sends OCSP response along with certificate (staples) to the client during TLS handshake in aServerCertificateStatus message.

    OCSP responses are short-lived (around a week). They are signed by CA, so client can confidence them.

    OCSP stapling approach solves several issues, inherent to regular OCSP approach:

  • Removes dependency between client and CA servers. No additional query, faster TLS handshake.
  • Protect website visitors privacy. Since browsers don’t talk to CA servers any more, they don’t leak browsing activity.
  • More resistant to CA server availability issues, since web server caches OCSP responses which are telling for several days.
  • Less load on CA servers, since number of https servers is less than number of clients/visitors.
  • Still, the biggest problem with OCSP stapling is that stapled response is an option and not mandatory. Clients don’t know whether to expect/require stapled OCSP responses from a website or not. If an attacker has a stolen revoked certificate it can live used without stapling. Browsers will fallback to regular OCSP, which can again live blocked, and browser will accept the certificate. They noiseless contain soft-fail deportment with a incorrect sense of security.

    Nginx configuration

    To setup stapling on Nginx:

    ssl_stapling on;ssl_stapling_verify on;

    Configure DNS servers so Nginx can resolve OCSP server IP address:

    resolver valid=300s ipv6=off;resolver_timeout 5s;

    Also, some folks point that you exigency to supply root and intermediate certificates chain via ssl_trusted_certificate , but I’ve tried and it works fine without it — I just contain a ssl_certificate directive pointing to a chain of website certificate plus intermediate one (without root CA cert).

    ssl_certificate /var/ssl/; Nginx issues

    The bitter verity is that Nginx is not that splendid at handling and serving OCSP stapling. 😞

    First request handled by an nginx worker process never has a stapled OCSP response. Nginx initiates a slothful OCSP query afterwards, and subsequent requests will most likely embrace OCSP response. Note, that OCSP stapling cache is per worker process, meaning you can regain several initial requests without OCSP stapling, as soon as they processed by different worker processes with a frosty OCSP cache.

    There are workarounds relish warming up OCSP cache beforehand, but that’s too much crap.

    You can check OSCP stapling on your own with a following command:

    openssl s_client -host -port 443 -status < /dev/null

    Valid OCSP stapled response should explore like:

    OCSP response:======================================OCSP Response Data:OCSP Response Status: successful (0x0)Response Type: Basic OCSP ResponseCert Status: goodThis Update: Jan 4 12:00:00 2018 GMTNext Update: Jan 11 12:00:00 2018 GMT

    There is yet another issue . When OCSP responder reports revoked certificate status, Nginx does not staple it at all, and they narrate it’s by design. Rather confusing to me 😕, because it completely breaks “must-staple” solution, described below.

    So you see, that current server-side implementation is far from being robust, and making otherwise splendid concept quite useless in practice.

    Chrome CRLset and Firefox OneCRL

    A CRLSet is Google’s own list of revoked certificates that it compiles and embeds inside Chrome. Lists are auto-updated by regularly crawling the CRLs from the major CAs around the world. Google does not exhaust OCSP servers or CRL lists, instead Chrome simply checks its own CRLSet for certificate status when visiting a secure website.

    It’s relish regular CRL approach, except that browser does not exigency contact CA’s servers and download a list, instead it already has the list embedded privilege into the browser, which is updated in timely manner.

    Surely, such CRLsets cannot encompass every practicable revoked certificate on the Internet. Instead of targeting end-server leaf certificates and DV certificates, they focus on high value intermediate CA certificates. This helps to quickly obstruct intermediate CA certificates in case of emergency, when the private key is compromised to avert an attacker to impersonate any site they relish by signing their own child certificates.

    Also, such lists might embrace high value EV certificates.

    Firefox has analogue solution, which is called OneCRL. In addition, Firefox exhaust regular OCSP approach.

    Must-staple extension

    As said before, OCSP stapling is splendid because it offloads OCSP requests from browser to the server, but it’s optional — browser contain no concept if stapled response is expected or not, and therefore they exhaust soft-fail behavior, which is a seat belt, that pretends to protect you, but breaks in case of emergency. So, meet “must-staple” extension.

    Must-staple is simply a flag in the certificate, that puts a mandatory requirement on OSCP stapling presence and instructs the browser that the certificate must live served with a telling OCSP response or the browser should hard fail on the connection.

    This flag is set when CA generates certificate for you. If you’re using LetsEncrypt CA, clients relish certbot or uphold issuing certificate with “Must-Staple” extension:

    Example with (ocsp-must-staple flag):

    $ --issue --ecc --keylength ec-256 -d -d --standalone --staging --ocsp-must-staple

    Example with certbot (must-staple flag):

    certbot certonly --non-interactive --cert-name -d, -m --agree-tos --preferred-challenges http-01 --rsa-key-size 2048 --standalone --staging --must-staple

    To check if certificate has “Must-Staple” flag, explore for extension ID:

    $ openssl x509 -in /var/ssl/ -text -noout X509v3 matter Alternative, DNS:www.foobbz.site1. 0....

    Alternatively, exhaust Qualys SSL server test:

    Must staple uphold reported by Qualys SSL server test

    Now, given the certificate with “Must-Staple” extension, if I circle off stapling altogether in the Nginx, browser should obstruct me with mistake failing to find OCSP stapled response during TLS handshake.

    ssl_stapling off;

    Firefox reports a cryptic mistake MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_REQUIRED_TLS_FEATURE_MISSING as expected. But Chrome tells cert is good — recall, Chrome does not supervene OCSP standard, even when it comes to stapling and must-staple stuff 😞

    Firefox and must-staple certificate without OCSP response

    Must-staple concept is mighty and allows to switch to hard-fail behavior. Also, solution scales well and does not interject client-side performance hit. And it makes impossible for attacker to exhaust stolen revoked certificate.

    Despite being a substantial improvement over regular OCSP, it’s not a silver bullet and not a 100% working solution. Primarily, it suffers from server-side implementation issues and lack of widespread client support. If server fails to reliably staple the OCSP response, or exhaust corrupted/erroneous response, or client is not ecstatic with stapled response, whatever goes wrong — you’d lock out the website completely due to browser hard-fail behavior. This is a huge risk, and web servers relish Nginx and Apache are not age at OSCP stapling yet.

    Note, there is a experimental Except-Staple HTTP response header, which helps you to monitor how dependable you as a site owner can staple splendid OCSP responses, and how clients are fine with those responses, before switching to hard-fail must-staple behavior.


    Given everything said above, there is no ready-to-go 100% working and dependable solution to construct browsers detect revoked certificates in a timely manner and spurn connecting to such websites.

    OCSP must-staple is mighty idea, but not practical due to server-side implementation issues, and puts a risk of blocking a website completely. Chrome’s CRLSet solution is good, but addresses only high-value intermediate CA certificates.

    When it comes to end-server certificates, you might resolve to give up with revocation stuff relish OCSP stapling, must-staple altogether. Just supervene security best practices. Reduce the validity term of the certificate and renew it more frequently, to reduce the time-frame for an attacker to exhaust stolen certificate. And yes, it sounds trivially, but withhold your private keys safe. finish not allow CAs to generate private key for you, protect it with a password, etc.


    Revocation is broken —

    The current status of certificate revocation (CRLs, OCSP and OCSP Stapling) —

    HTTPS Certificate Revocation is broken, and it’s time for some recent tools | Ars Technica —

    OCSP Must-Staple —

    The Problem with OCSP Stapling and Must Staple and why Certificate Revocation is noiseless broken — Hanno’s blog —

    ImperialViolet — Revocation checking and Chrome’s CRL —

    Google Chrome will no longer check for revoked SSL certificates online | Computerworld —

    Damn it, nginx! More bugs, this time with SSL OCSP stapling. —

    Exploring HyperLedger: relish in Being a Framework Early Adopter | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Key Takeaways
  • Some time ago the OpenGift team explored deploying a HyperLedger-based blockchain within a production environment. This article presents a chronicle of their attempts to integrate it, the problems they encountered, and the tricks that helped us decipher them. 
  • We believe that HyperLedger Fabric is potentially a better option for blockchain-based commerce applications than a private Ethereum network.
  • With HyperLedger you can build a system where clients finish not exigency to confidence other clients, and partners finish not exigency to confidence other partners (but clients finish exigency to confidence partners).
  • The network is smooth to expand and can exist without a parent organization.
  • HyperLedger is not free of technical drawbacks, and so live prepared to write a lot of supporting scripts for maintaining HyperLedger in production.
  • Some time ago their team explored deploying a HyperLedger-based blockchain within a production environment. This article presents a chronicle of their attempts to integrate it, the problems they encountered, and tricks that helped us decipher them. Several distinguished updates contain been introduced into the HyperLedger framework, and so some of the challenges were overcome, while others noiseless wait for a solution. 

    In the first portion of the article they warrant why they decided to exhaust a blockchain to decipher a  business problem and why they chose the HyperLedger framework over Ethereum. The second portion of the article is dedicated to HyperLedger-based blockchain architecture and technical aspects of the framework implementation. 

    Why exhaust blockchain?

    We initially believed that blockchain was unnecessary for their business. After all, most businesses resolve their confidence issues by referring to centralized facilities or arbitrage centers. As a result, it took us a long time to resolve whether in their case a blockchain solution was needed or not. 

    Our platform is a kindly of web resource where companies can reduce their evolution time and maintenance costs by working directly with open source teams. They identified that for some customers it might live difficult to establish working relationships with open source maintainers and key collaborators. The criterion drill of resorting to services of in-house developers or freelancers for fine-tuning open source code seemed sub-optimal, because of increased project time and price.  

    With their platform they aimed to resolve this inefficiency by providing an ‘entry point’ and simple interface for customers to request and co-finance developing recent features in OSS. For this system to live sustainable they needed to interject a utensil that would incentivise developers to fulfill customers’ requests. After some deliberation, they approach up with an concept of ‘digital ownership’.

    The concept was quite simple: a person who registers a project on their platform receives digital ‘shares’, which they may transfer to his fellow contributors at their own discretion. As the denomination suggests, their shares enable holders to receive a partake of a project income proportional to the partake of ownership. On the top of that constraint, they added a rule that any ‘outsider’ developer could create  a requested piece of functionality, and if this solution is accepted by clients, receive a portion of the project’s shares. 

    We wanted developers to deal their project shares as a valuable long-term asset, which inherently implies that developers believe it won’t disappear. They basically had two options: they could either postpone introduction of this functionality until they gain the community’s trust, or they could build a trustless system. The latter path would require pile a platform in such a course that would leave the assets untouched even if the parent organization exited the business.   

    We furthermore planned to integrate the platform with numerous partner organizations, which would outsource evolution tasks to their platform and automatically receive a fee when they are completed.  In an example scenario, they would just provide an access point for organizations into their network through some simple registration process, such as API integration. Their goal was to construct the process as smooth as practicable to avoid eachandevery the legal complications and paperwork. After some doubts, they decided that blockchain would succor us to realize this vision.

    Ethereum vs HyperLedger

    Ethereum was their first choice, even though they didn’t contain significant relish with the platform. They hadn’t studied the documentation in detail; they just got privilege to spiking the integration. At first glance, it seemed relish an smooth choice. Several factors led us to give it a try:

  • It’s rather mature;
  • It’s stable;
  • it’s smooth to integrate;
  • it’s smooth to develop;
  • It has a large community;
  • It’s been rapidly developing;
  • It’s been used in numerous projects;
  • It gives an chance of private deploying in their private network.
  • One the other hand, there were a few factors that eventually convinced us that Ethereum was not the privilege selection for us: 

  • Non-determinacy of the consensus algorithm.
  • Proof-of-work (POW) is unpredictable. 
  • Non-existence of roles.
  • Uncontrollable access to the network.  
  • Transaction fee and high CPU workload even in a sleep mode (minor).
  • Some of these issues contain potential mitigations in evolution in the Ethereum world. For example, the GHOST protocol modification may well help, but even in this case if owners of the major pools suddenly resolve that their arm is longer than yours, while your tanker with tuna is in on its course to the destination point… well, the cancellation of the payment transaction may surprise you, if the transaction is being conducted over a public (or shared-use) Ethereum network.

    In an extreme case, they may even contain a partner whose node capacity allows them to outhash the all network, so there would live no point in using blockchain. 

    It was furthermore very distinguished to us to understand whether a network member is a client or a partner. They contain to know this for sure. The Ethereum network does not uphold this feature, so they would exigency to build this on top. They certainly could integrate their VPN into the blockchain. But if they provide access to partners, there, naturally, should live a course to open up such access. At the identical time, they would relish to exercise control over who has access to their network and what they can regain from it.

    A key takeaway is that it’s distinguished to recollect that within a business-use case corporate node capacities may significantly preponderate over private ones. This is why they opted for a private blockchain, using Hyperledger framework. 

    HyperLedger furthermore allowed us to avoid the minor inconveniences that they observed regarding the costs of transactions and CPU usage that they observed with Ethereum.

    At this time the HyperLedger Fabric was one of the most advanced and age frameworks in the family. It furthermore has a few features that construct it to stand out. The permissioned architecture ensures that if someone accessed your blockchain, you know whether they contain a certificate issued by a Certificate Authority (CA). They furthermore liked its deterministic PBFT algorithm, with which you can live 100% certain that a transaction is completed once your received such notification. Test launching on docker-containers is furthermore very simple.

    We tried to device out whether they exigency Byzantine Fault-Tolerance. finish they really confidence their partners, and finish they really confidence us? Can they afford to expose ourselves to Byzantine Generals’ Problem, knowing that at any instant any node could start sending incorrect data to the network? They eventually decided that they should contain such protection, and it was fairly smooth with HyperLedger. 

    Still in doubt, they conducted some tests to compare HyperLedger Fabric and Ethereum in a private network.  We coded a trivial constrict that generates a long array and then sorts it. You can observe the results on the graph below. They contain added two lines for 1 million and 10 million elements to the image just to pointto that Hyperledger is here too. In fact, the disagreement is such stout that lines are actually invisible. 

    Y axis: Milliseconds.  

    Y axis: Megabytes 

    Now let’s consider the time required for reaching a consensus. They took a simple void transaction and Put it in a cluster of 8 machines. The machines had to achieve an agreement and recur confirmation: they waited for six confirmations in the Ethereum private network and a confirmation from each node in the HyperLedger network.  The hasten was noiseless better in the HyperLedger cluster. 

    Y axis:  seconds

    We should note that they conducted the tests on version 0.6 of the HyperLedger Fabric framework; as of today the latest version is 1.2.0, which has a divide node responsible for maintaining  transaction order. Back then, the network became frozen if you increased the number of nodes to 16 and the hasten to 500 transactions per second. At such pace the network was not able to achieve a consensus before receiving a recent transaction request. 

    HyperLedger architecture 

    Before they swagger forward, let’s consider the basic architecture of the Hyperledger blockchain. 

    Peer - the main node, which stores information about eachandevery transactions (in version 1.0 it is divided into Endorser, a peer that confirms transactions, and Committer, a peer that records transactions to the register.)  

    App - the client initiating a transaction can live replaced with its own application on Hyperledger SDK

    CA - provides users with certificates that allow them to construct transactions and read data from the registry

    Orderer - arranges transactions in obstruct and transfer blocks to nodes for recording in the ledger

    HyperLedger can divide nodes by roles. In particular, there is a peer that stores the register. In the 1.2 version there are several subtypes of peers, but generally peers are responsible for storing registers and validating incoming transactions. They store eachandevery smart-contracts and chain-codes, and sanction incoming transactions and deliver them to the register. 

    The application they built is on the frontend. It can forward information about transactions to the blockchain, and it can login to blockchain with a member certificate. It is furthermore responsible for consensus. 

    The CA issues certificates. By default, HyperLedger can distinguish nodes by organizational attribute; each organization has its own root certificate. With a membership certificate you can allot rights on completing smart-contracts, rights on changing network configuration, and rights on adding recent peers – basically whatever you may want. In the newest versions of the framework, you can furthermore add any attributes you relish to certificates, so you can live even more springy in providing different sets of rights to system participants. 

    An ordering service, or the “orderer”, is a set of nodes responsible for a transaction order in a block. The orderer collects transactions into a obstruct and sends this obstruct to peers, so they can commit it to a register. It does not store smart contracts, though stores ledger data  in a binary file, which is used to bootstrap recent peer. Losing this file means losing eachandevery blockchain data. The orderer furthermore performs some validation: it checks hashes and signatures.

    For example, their system consists of the following elements: 

  • A web application, 
  • A peer, 
  • An OpenGift organization, 
  • A root CA of the organization 
  • An intermediate CA, which was designed with an concept of scaling up the system; 
  • A cluster of orderers on Apache Kafka to which eachandevery partner peers refer 
  • At the present moment, their blockchain is deployed on four true peers, and they contain four orderers in Kafka. They ultimately exigency five, as it is recommended to exhaust an odd number of nodes for the ordering service in this mode. They contain approximately 100 client applications, 1 Root CA and 1 Intermediate CA. In the first several months of their labor they contain conducted over 1000 transactions, but their system allows us to process the identical quantity in 1 second. 

    Partners contain their own peers so that they can store a register and validate transactions, and customers can refer to any peer they relish to interact with the blockchain.  

    Client applications log in to the blockchain by providing a certificate, which can live issued by a Certification Authority intermediate server trusted by blockchain, for example, “organization one”. CA Intermediate servers are authorized by a CA Root server, which is kept aside of blockchain network.   Then the client application can interact with peers within the framework of available policies, in compliance with restrictions and permissions. Once any peer confirms a transaction submitted by the application, and if it uses any consensus algorithm, it sends the transaction to the orderer. The orderer commits these transactions to peers. After that, the application can wait for any number of confirmations from the peers to construct certain that the transaction was recorded in the ledger. 

    What is it relish to implement HyperLedger Fabric in production?

    Perhaps the first thing you notice is an absence of any simple admin panel. It's very difficult to maintain it eachandevery in production mode without Kubernetes or Swarm, so they had to write a lot of supporting scripts. Hopefully,  with the Cello project this will change for the better. 

    We faced several technical challenges while trying to implement this architecture. First, the orderer service can operate in two modes: solo mode and Apache Kafka mode. If you exhaust solo mode, you can’t switch to the scalable mode without re-creating the entire network. 

    Second, If you exhaust the orderer services on Kafka, you cannot scale it to other organizations. If other organizations already contain their own orderer services, you will exigency to achieve an agreement on who will live in permeate of arranging transactions in blocks. This means that only one organization can live responsible for the order of transactions in a block, which leads to some vulnerability. However, in general, if transactions are valid, their order in a obstruct is not of a particular importance. If someone changes the order of transactions and they become invalid, they will simply live marked as invalid in the block, and your request will recur “fail”.

    CAs (certification authorities) are easily scalable. Each organization has a root CA, and it can issue any number of certificates to intermediate CAs. This is mighty because the CAs are responsible for adding users to the network. However, the certificate revocation mode is not well configured. First, in order to request several parties to mark a revocation certificate, you exigency to write an additional chain code. Second, even when you add information about a revoked certificate in a blockchain, the certificate ex-holder can noiseless connect to peers. You contain to generate the certificates manually and add them to folders of peers and orders. Controlling that character of process may live challenging in a decentralized structure.

    You furthermore exigency to withhold in reason that until the orderer has created a recent block, eachandevery queries to the register will recur the previous status of the network, i.e. the register has transactional (versioned) semantics. This means that if you contain a commerce process that consists of multiple read queries and a write query privilege after them that takes into account the result of the read queries, you had better construct them asynchronous. Because in this case, your expectation of reading the registry will not live consistent with its true state. In general, you exigency to wait for the orderer to configuration a obstruct and forward it to the ledger; only after that can you forward read queries, assuming that the status has already been changed. 

    Since the blocks are not created according to POW protocol, you can set any obstruct creating frequency for the ordering service. In solo mode, you will not live able to create more than one obstruct per second, and in Apache Kafka mode, you can configure this parameter quite flexibly. withhold in reason though, if you decrease waiting time for creating recent block, your network will augment in size quite quickly. Disk space will furthermore live consumed very quickly, and so you always exigency to find a poise between a hasten of transactions confirmation and your capacity. 

    The consensus mechanism is realized at the transaction level, so you can specify requirements that transactions will exigency to comply with to live telling in smart contract. For instance, when you interject a recent smart constrict in the chain code, you set a procedure of its confirmation, how many participants contain to mark the transaction for it to remain valid. 

    Smart contracts can live written in several languages, Golang and Java being the main ones. A typical smart constrict has the simplest structure. Only two simple methods are required to live used in smart contract: one  of the methods is called when a recent chain code is set up or upgraded (init) , and the other one when it is called(invoke). Different policies are configured to initialize a recent smart constrict and to muster it. One group of users can live responsible for updating of a smart contract; another group can live responsible for its implementation. Here they consider the simplest role call, which takes a role and parameters of this role as an input dispute and depending on the denomination of the role calls the needed method. 

    func (t *SimpleChaincode) add(stub shim.ChaincodeStubInterface, args []string) pb.Response { var cs clientState; clienState.Name = args[0] clientState.Balance = 0 strState, er := json.Marshal(clientState) err = stub.PutState(pName, []byte(strState)) if err ~= nil { recur shim.Error("Failed to add Client state") } recur shim.Success([]byte(“OK”)) }

    Data storage in HyperLedger may live considered as a key-value map, referred to as KV-storage.  Working with KV-storage is quite low-level.  With PutState() manner you can write in KV-storage, and with GetState() you read from it. But the most keen thing is that you can labor in a smart constrict with the attributes of certificates. In this sample you can observe how the hash of the public key of an authorized user is used as an identifier for his wallet. In the 395th line they regain a hash and exhaust it as a key for KV-storage.

    func (t *SimpleChaincode) add(stub shim.ChaincodeStubInterface, args []string) pb.Response { pk, err := cid.GetX509CertificatePublicKey(stub) var cs clientState; clienState.Name = args[0] clientState.Balance = 0 strState, er := json.Marshal(clientState) err = stub.PutState(pName, []byte(strState)) if err ~= nil { recur shim.Error("Failed to add Client state") } recur shim.Success([]byte(pk)) } func (t *SimpleChaincode) query(stub shim.ChaincodeStubInterface, args []string) pb.Response { pk, err := cid.GetX509CertificatePublicKey(stub) strState, err :- stub.GetState(pk) if strState == nil { recur shim.Error("Client not found") } var cs clientState err = json.Unmarshal(Avalbytes, &cs) recur shim.Success([]byte(cs.Balance)) }

    Although, they are noiseless using the 0.6 version of the framework, the newer versions contain some major improvements, which they contain to mention:

  • In the older versions, you needed to recreate eachandevery blockchain to embrace a recent organization in a genesis block. Now it’s quite simple and you furthermore can change policies of working with blockchain for each organization. 
  • Starting with 1.2. version the system can contain its peers compute the requested information dynamically and present it to the SDK in a consumable manner. 
  • External applications can receive and process information about events from a chain. This feature may live helpful in a number of cases, for sample - for notifying a controlling organization about suspicious activity.  
  • HyperLedger relish in a nutshell

    From the technical perspective, the system is noiseless developing (steadily but firmly.)  There are some technical issues, but hopefully that the community will find solutions for them. noiseless and all, they believe HyperLedger is one of the best options for companies looking to implement blockchain in real-world business. 

    On the commerce side, thanks to the framework they successfully realized the intended digital ownership functionality, which helps us to incentivize evolution teams to labor on open source projects. The network is smooth to expand and can exist without a parent organization. If they disappear, the community agrees upon setting a recent ordering service, updates the channel and continue working.

    Based on a feedback we’ve received, this capability facilitates adoption of the platform, since their users don’t exigency to confidence us and rely on their ability to finish business. They are actively looking for partners to hand over the nodes and contrivance to undertake first technical integrations for their blockchain in early 2019. 

    About the Authors

    Yegor Maslov is the CEO of OpenGift Inc., platform for open source software monetization, Head of The Hive project, system empowering code reusability in organizations. Yegor has over 15 years of software evolution relish in web and mobile fields combined with an extensive background in technical entrepreneurship.

    Konstantin Erokhin is a DevOps engineer with over 10 years of professional experience. He worked in such companies as Kaspersky, Sberbank Technologies, Moscow Stock Exchange.

    Information security certification guide: Intermediate flush | true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Experience can live the best instructor, but security professionals may find that instruction coupled with more advanced...

    certifications can succor further their careers. While introductory certifications may succor novices regain a foot in the door, an intermediate information security certification or two may succor them assume the next step.

    This report comprehensively reviews the current status of intermediate security certifications, highlighting which are best for achieving goals specific to an information security career path. It's a companion to three other articles, which cover the vendor-specific information security certification landscape, vendor-neutral certification career paths and cloud security certifications in detail.

    Several changes contain been made for this updated cybersecurity certifications guide. The following table shows the number of certifications in the 2015 edition, as well as this 2017 edition. The overall numbers for vendor-neutral information security certifications increased by about 14%. Several certifications contain been discontinued, and 19 credentials contain been added. Some certifications contain been moved to recent categories to more accurately classify them.

    Some of the notable recent entries in this information security certification sheperd embrace the CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst certification and two recent EC-Council certs: the EC-Council Certified Network Defender and the EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist.

    Part three of this information security certification sheperd offers advanced options for more experienced professionals. portion four includes certifications for forensics and anti-hacking, and portion five covers more specialized certifications.

    Editor's note: The credentials are listed in alphabetical order within each section.

    General Cybersecurity certifications -- Intermediate

    (ISC)2 Certified Authorization Professional (CAP) The (ISC)2 Certified Authorization Professional certification identifies individuals possessing "skills and abilities required for personnel involved in the process of authorizing and maintaining information systems," according to (ISC)2. "Specifically, this credential applies to those responsible for formalizing processes used to assess risk and establish security requirements and documentation. Their decisions will ensure that information systems possess security commensurate with the flush of exposure to potential risk, as well as damage to assets or individuals."

    In particular, this credential confirms that the holder has the knowledge, skill and relish necessary to accredit and maintain systems within the Risk Management Framework described in the NIST SP 800-37 Rev 1 specification. Candidates must contain two years of full-time relish in one or more of the seven domains of the CAP Common body of Knowledge. It's furthermore recommended that candidates possess one to two years of general technical, database, systems evolution and network experience, along with two years of general systems experience.

    Candidates must furthermore prove technical or auditing relish within the government, U.S. Department of Defense or specific industry sectors.

    (ISC)2 offers the Associate of (ISC)2 credential for candidates who pass the CAP, Certified Cyber Forensic Professional, Certified Cloud Security Professional, Certified Information Systems Security Professional, Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional, HealthCare Information Security and Privacy Practitioners, or Systems Security Certified Practitioner exam, but finish not yet meet the relish requirement.

    Source: (ISC)² Certified Authorization Professional

    Mile2 Certified Incident Handling Engineer (CIHE) The Mile2 CIHE certification recognizes security professionals who labor to avert attacks on their organization's IT infrastructure, and those who participate in incident response to successful cyberattacks. Certification candidates are expected to live confidential with common hacking approaches and techniques, safeguards, incident handling procedures, and techniques for quickly recovering from attacks.

    Mile2 recommends that candidates contain at least 12 months of networking experience, as well as knowledge of TCP/IP, Microsoft packages and Linux before taking the associated course and exam.

    Source: Mile2 Certified Incident Handling Engineer

    EC-Council Certified Network Defender (CND) Holders of the EC-Council CND certification contain abysmal knowledge of network security controls and protocols, and know how to manage apparatus and appliances -- firewalls, intrusion detection, etc. -- that protect networks from attack. Other skills embrace network traffic analysis, vulnerability scanning and assessment, network security policy maintenance, and creation of incident response plans.

    The skills required for this credential align with the National Initiative of Cybersecurity Education framework, and they map to Department of Defense job roles for system/network administrators. Candidates must assume a course and pass the certification exam.

    Source: EC-Council Certified Network Defender

    CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst (CSA+) The CompTIA CSA+ certification is a vendor-neutral credential designed to certify professionals who contain three to four years of security and behavioral analytics experience. A CSA+ commonly works with data collected by network protocol analyzers, network intrusion detection systems, and security information and event management software.

    For candidates climbing the CompTIA certification ladder, the CSA+ is the next rung above Security+ and just below the advanced-level CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner.

    Source: CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst

    (ISC)² Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional (CSSLP) The (ISC)² CSSLP certification recognizes individuals who specialize in software security across the lifecycle, from conceptualization and design, through coding, testing and deployment.

    Candidates must contain at least four years of direct relish in the software evolution lifecycle in one or more of the eight domains covered in the CSSLP Common body of Knowledge, harmonize to adhere to a code of ethics, reply questions regarding their criminal history and background, and pass one exam.

    Candidates who lack the requisite relish may become an Associate of (ISC)2 by passing the CSSLP exam. Those obtaining the Associate credential contain five years to gain the required relish in order to upgrade the certification.

    Source: (ISC)² Certified Secure Software Lifecycle Professional

    Mile2 Certified Wireless Security Engineer (CWSE) The Mile2 CWSE certification is geared toward network administrators, systems engineers, IT managers and security consultants who are responsible for the security of one or more wireless local area networks (WLANs). Certification candidates must live confidential with WLAN security concepts, legacy security, common attacks, WLAN auditing and more.

    Prerequisites for the CWSE certification are the Mile2 Certified Security Sentinel and Certified Information Systems Security Officer certifications, or at least 12 months of networking experience. Candidates must pass one exam to achieve certification.

    Source: Mile2 Certified Wireless Security Engineer

    CertiTrek Group Certified Wireless Security Professional (CWSP) Made available by the CertiTrek Certified Wireless Network Professional (CWNP) Wi-Fi certification and training unit, the CWSP credential recognizes individuals who can design, implement and manage wireless LAN security.

    To obtain this credential, candidates must pass one exam.

    Source: CWNP Certified Wireless Security Professional

    EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist (ECES) The EC-Council ECES recognizes IT professionals who can select and apply symmetric and asymmetric cryptography, common algorithms and hashing algorithms. A professional with the ECES credential can furthermore set up a virtual private network, select and implement digital certificates, encrypt a drive, and exhaust a variety of steganography tools.

    To obtain ECES certification, a candidate needs to complete a three-day course and pass one exam.

    Source: EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist

    SANS Institute Global Information Assurance Certification Program (GIAC) SANS is well-known for timely, focused and useful security information and training courses. SANS offers regular in-person training, as well as online classes, and uses such classes to draw attendees to their frequent, well-situated, week-long conferences.

    SANS created the GIAC program to administer certifications related to SANS training. The GIAC program seeks to identify individuals who can demonstrate both knowledge of and the ability to manage and protect distinguished information systems and networks.

    Overall, the GIAC program aims at serious, full-time security professionals responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining a state-of-the-art security infrastructure, which may embrace incident handling and emergency response team management. Available intermediate-level GIAC credentials embrace the following:

  • GIAC Security Essentials Certification
  • GIAC Information Security Professional
  • GIAC Certified Incident Handler
  • Global Industrial Cyber Security Professional
  • Source: SANS Global Information Assurance Certification

    Security University Qualified/Certification & Accreditation certification (Q/CA) Security University's Q/CA is for system certifiers and validators who exigency cybersecurity skills. The class identifies individuals who can assess security skills to certify and validate systems and manage the security threats within an organization, particularly in the government and enterprise sectors.

    The class has several labs on security controls and ends with a certification and accreditation validation practical. The Q/CA class meets the objectives of the National Security Agency's Committee on National Security Systems 4016A for a Fully Qualified Navy Validator.

    Source: Security University Qualified Certification & Accreditation certification

    Security University Qualified/Wireless Security Professional (Q/WSP) Security University's Q/WSP identifies and validates individuals who can architect and install wireless networks and manage and mitigate risk. Candidates must pass one exam. 

    Source: Security University Qualified/Wireless Security Professional

    About the author: Ed Tittel is a 30-plus year IT veteran who's worked as a developer, networking consultant, technical trainer, writer and expert witness. Perhaps best known for creating the Exam Cram series, he has contributed to more than 100 books on many computing topics, including titles on information security, Windows OSes and HTML.

    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

    References :

    Dropmark :
    Wordpress :
    Issu :
    Dropmark-Text :
    Blogspot :
    weSRCH :
    Youtube :
    Google+ :
    Calameo : : : :

    Back to Main Page | |