SPS-100 real questions | Pass4sure SPS-100 real questions |

Pass4sure SPS-100 dumps | SPS-100 real questions |

SPS-100 IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics flat 1

Study sheperd Prepared by IBM Dumps Experts SPS-100 Dumps and real Questions

100% real Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with lofty Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

SPS-100 exam Dumps Source : IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics flat 1

Test Code : SPS-100
Test denomination : IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics flat 1
Vendor denomination : IBM
real questions : 70 real Questions

worked difficult on SPS-100 books, however the entire component gain become on this test manual.
It were years and i was caught at the identical designation, it emerge as enjoy being glued to the chair with fevicol. Initially you conform with you studied, simply wait suitable matters are to live had time. However then your staying power wears off and you gotta capture a stand earlier than its too late. For the purpose that my craft work includes more frequently than not managing a SPS-100 customers foundation I determined to ace it and discontinuance up the he is alert of sum approximately SPS-100 dude in the office. Upon a buddies steering I attempted your SPS-100 demo from, loved and it and moved onto a buy. Your exam simulator is fantastic and today your examine package has made me the cutting-edge SPS-100 manager.

birthday party is over! Time to gain a spy at and skip the examination.
I were given 76% in SPS-100 exam. way to the team of for making my attempt so easy. I advocate to fresh customers to consequence together via as its very complete.

are you able to accept as trusty with, sum SPS-100 questions I organized had been asked.
I gain cleared SPS-100 exam in a unique try with ninety eight% marks. is the attribute medium to smooth this exam. Thanks, your case research and material had been well. I want the timer might race too whilst they present the drill exams. Thank you again.

SPS-100 certification examination is quite traumatic.
Wow..OMG, I simply handed my SPS-100 cert with 97 percent score i was uncertain on how top the test materialbecame. I practiced with your on line test simulator, and studied the material and after taking the test i used to live joyous i establish you guys at the internet, YAHOO!! thanks Very plenty! Philippines

Do you want real capture a spy at qustions present day SPS-100 examination?
I went loopy while my test changed into in every week and that i out of location my SPS-100 syllabus. I were given blank and wasnt able to discern out the way to cope up with the scenario. Manifestly, they sum are privy to the importance the syllabus at some point of the practise period. Its miles the excellent paper which directs the manner. At the very time as i used to live almost mad, I were given to recognize about killexams. Cant thank my buddy for making me privy to the sort of blessing. Practise changed into a gross lot less difficult with the attend of SPS-100 syllabus which I got via the web site.

It is considerable to gain SPS-100 question bank and study guide.
I had been given 79% in SPS-100 exam. Your commemorate dump emerge as very useful. A large thanks kilexams!

It changed into first revel in however remarkable experience!
I gain cleared SPS-100 exam in one attempt with 98% marks. is the best medium to pellucid this exam. Thank You, your case studies and material were good. I wish the timer would race too while they give the drill exams. Thanks again.

Great occasion to bag certified SPS-100 exam.
Hi team, i gain completed SPS-100 in first try and thank you lots on your useful questions and answers.

Little spy at for SPS-100 exam, notable success.
First of sum I want to mention Thanks to you people. I gain cleared SPS-100 Exam by way of subscribing to your examine material. So I wanted to share my fulfillment in your website. Thank you once again. Thank you very much to your extremely qualified assist. I even gain cleared my SPS-100 with 90%.

it's far unbelieveable, however SPS-100 real capture a spy at questions are availabe birthright here.
I became approximately to submission exam SPS-100 because I wasnt assured in whether or not I could pass or no longer. With just a week last I decided to exchange to QA for my exam preparation. Never concept that the subjects that I had always race away from might live so much fun to observe; its immaculate and brief way of getting to the factors made my practise lot less complicated. sum thanks to QA, I never conception I could skip my exam but I did pass with flying shades.


IBM Watson Studio: Product Overview and perception | real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

down load the authoritative book: Cloud Computing 2019: using the Cloud for aggressive competencies

See the entire checklist of machine researching SolutionsSee user stories of IBM Watson Studio

final analysis

Watson is an umbrella for sum IBM profound gaining erudition of and artificial intelligence, as well as machine discovering. The company was a pioneer in introducing AI technologies to the company world. What this capability for patrons: Watson Studio is a proper contender for any difficult looking to deploy computer getting to know and profound discovering technologies.

The platform provides extensive rig and technologies for statistics scientists, builders and field recollect experts that crave to discover statistics, construct fashions, and train and deploy laptop getting to know fashions at scale. The solution contains rig to share visualizations and consequences with others. Watson Studio supports cloud, computer and native deployment frameworks.

The latter resides at the back of a firm’s firewall or as a SaaS solution running in an IBM private cloud. IBM Watson Studio is ranked as a “leader” within the Forrester Wave. It was a purchasers’ alternative 2018 recipient at Gartner Peer Insights.

Product Description

Watson Studio relies on a group of IBM rig and applied sciences to construct powerful desktop gaining erudition of functions and functions. This includes IBM Cloud pretrained computing device getting to know fashions reminiscent of visible recognition, Watson natural Language Classifier, and others. The atmosphere uses Jupyter Notebooks along with different open supply tools and scripting languages to complement developed-in collaborative assignment features.;n=203;c=204660772;s=9478;x=7936;f=201812281334210;u=j;z=TIMESTAMP;a=20403954;e=i

The outcome is an ambiance that helps speedy and strong desktop researching structure and attribute tuning of models. records scientists and others can pick between a lot of capacities of Anaconda, Spark and GPU environments.

Watson Studio helps superior visible modeling through a drag-and-drop interface supplied by IBM’s SPSS Modeler. moreover, it comprises automated profound getting to know using a drag-and-drop, no-code interface in Neural community Modeler.

Overview and lines user Base

facts scientists, builders and matter matter consultants.


Graphical drag-and-drop and command line.

Scripting Languages/formats Supported

helps Anaconda and Apache Spark. The latter offers Scala, Python and R interfaces.

formats Supported

Most principal data and file codecs are supported via open source Jupyter Notebooks.


IBM Watson Studio connects a few IBM items, including SPSS Modeler and statistics Science undergo (DSX) along with open supply tools, with the demur to bring a sturdy Predictive Analytics and computing device getting to know (PAML) solution.

The environment incorporates open statistics sets through Jupyter Notebooks, Apache Spark and the Python Pixiedust library. The cloud version points interactivity with workstation servers and R Studio, together with Python, R., and Scala coder for facts scientists.

Reporting and Visualization

Visualization via SPSS Modeler. robust logging and reporting features are constructed into the product.


IBM has adopted a pay-as-you-go mannequin. Watson Studio Cloud – common charges $ninety nine monthly with 50 capacity unit hours monthly blanketed. Watson Studio Cloud - enterprise runs $6,000 per thirty days with 5,000 skill unit hours. Watson Studio laptop charges $199 monthly with limitless modeling. Watson Studio local – for enterprise statistics science teams N/A.

IBM Watson Studio Overview and lines at a look:

seller and features

IBM Watson Studio

ML focal point

broad statistics science heart of attention with cloud and computer ML systems.

Key aspects and capabilities

robust visible cognizance and natural classification tools. resilient strategy that accommodates open source equipment. Connects to IBM SPSS Modeler.

consumer feedback

incredibly rated for elements and capabilities. Some complaints revolving round using notebooks.

Pricing and licensing

Tiered mannequin from $99 monthly per person to $6,000 monthly per person or greater at enterprise level.

IBM sends Cognos, SPSS to the cloud | real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Two of IBM’s most frequent evaluation products, the Cognos company Intelligence and the SPSS predictive analytics equipment, are headed for the cloud, the latest in an ongoing propel by using IBM to port its significant software portfolio to the cloud.

getting access to any such application from a hosted environment, rather than buying the package outright, offers a number of merits to valued clientele.

“We manage the infrastructure, and this allows you to scale greater without hardship and bag sum started with less upfront investment,” talked about Eric Sall, IBM vice president of international analytics advertising.

IBM announced these additions to its cloud features, as well as a number of fresh choices, at its insight user conference for data analytics, held this week in Las Vegas.

by way of 2016, 25 p.c of recent company evaluation deployments may live completed within the cloud, in line with Gartner.

Analytics could aid businesses in many techniques, in line with IBM. It might deliver further perception within the buying habits of clients, in addition to perception into how well its personal operations are performing. It could attend defend programs from attacks and attempts at fraud, as well as assure that company departments are meeting compliance necessities.

the fresh on-line edition of Cognos, IBM Cognos enterprise Intelligence on Cloud, can currently live verified in a preview mode. IBM plans to present Cognos as a replete commercial service early next year. users can race Cognos against records they retain in the IBM cloud, or in opposition t information they store on premises.

A replete industrial version of the online IBM SPSS Modeler may live available inside 30 days. This package will encompass sum of the SPSS components for records based mostly predictive modeling, corresponding to a modeler server, analytics determination administration utility and a information server.

earlier this 12 months, IBM pledged to present tons of its application portfolio as cloud capabilities, many through its Bluemix set of platform services.

besides Cognos and SPSS, IBM furthermore unveiled a few fresh and updated choices at the conference.

One fresh service, DataWorks, gives a pair of techniques for refining and cleaning information so it is equipped for analysis. The enterprise has launched a cloud-based mostly data warehousing service, known as dashDB. a fresh Watson-based mostly carrier, known as Watson Explorer, gives a routine for users to examine herbal language questions about varied units of interior facts.

To observation on this text and other PCWorld content, consult with their facebook web page or their Twitter feed.

IBM, SAS, and SAP Listed as Visionary Leaders by means of 360Quadrants for Predictive Analytics | real Questions and Pass4sure dumps

PUNE, India, Feb. 27, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- 360Quadrants powered by means of MarketsandMarkets™, the area's only comparison platform that combines knowledgeable evaluation with crowdsourced insights has released a quadrant on Predictive Analytics software to attend corporations discharge quicker and extra advised choices. the first unencumber of the quadrant has IBM, SAS, and SAP sharing space as Visionary Leaders. 360Quadrants are generated submit evaluation of corporations (product portfolios and company strategy). Quadrants might live up to date every three months, and the location of carriers will mirror how patrons, traffic specialists, and other vendors expense them on distinctive parameters.

Quadrant highlights

one hundred fifty+ agencies offering predictive analytics software were analyzed of which 31 businesses were shortlisted and classified on a quadrant beneath Visionary Leaders, Innovators, Dynamic Differentiators, and emerging Leaders.

IBM SPSS Modeler, SAS advanced Analytics, SAP company Objects, FICO choice administration Suite, Tableau application, RapidMiner Studio, Oracle superior Analytics, and Angoss potential Studio had been recognized as visionary leaders as they gain established product portfolios and a robust market presence and traffic strategy.

guidance Builders WebFocus, Knime AG, MicroStrategy, NTT Analytics solution, Alteryx Predictive Analytics, Dataiku, GoodData, and TIBCO Spotfire had been identified as innovators as they gain got concentrated product portfolios, but a mediocre traffic strategy.

AgileOne Cortex, Kognito, Exago, Qlik View, 6Sense ABM Orchestration Platform, figure Eight, Opera options mark Hub, Radius Intelligence, Domino facts Lab, Civis Analytics, and Lytics had been identified as rising groups as they've a gap product offering but terrible enterprise strategy. Greenwave Axon Predict, Teradata Analytics, Microsoft Azure computing device researching, and Sisense were identified as dynamic differentiators.

The 360Quadrants platform gives probably the most granular predictive analytics utility evaluation between carriers.


The methodology used to rank predictive analytics application businesses concerned using wide secondary analysis to identify key vendors via referring to annual experiences, press releases, investor displays, white papers, and numerous connected directories and databases. 31 key vendors had been shortlisted on the groundwork of their breadth of product choices, difficult measurement, and different standards. The scores and weights for shortlisted vendors against each parameter gain been finalized post analysis.  After the ratings had been finalized, each supplier was placed in respective quadrants according to their score within the product providing and enterprise strategy parameters.

About 360Quadrants

360Quadrants pretty much compares groups in rising applied sciences on 6 large maturities: product maturity, enterprise maturity, use-case maturity, investment maturity, technology maturity, and enterprise outcomes maturity. every traffic is reviewed through four stakeholders—patrons, trade experts, other vendors, and MarketsandMarkets analysts—to discharge it independent. 360 aims to simplify and de-possibility tangled buy selections. patrons bag to personalize their quadrant towards their specific needs. The mixed insights from peers, analysts, consultants, and vendors cleave the color and helps the purchaser discover the gold measure appropriate solution. carriers bag to position themselves to win greatest fresh consumers, customise their quadrants, discharge a decision key parameters, and location themselves strategically in a gap house, to live consumed by way of giants and begin-united states of americaalike. experts bag to grow their personal company and boost their notion leadership. The 360 platform targets the structure of a convivial network that hyperlinks trade specialists with agencies worldwide.

360Quadrants has additionally launched quadrants in fields enjoy utility Modernization features, AI in Fintech solutions, and Cognitive Analytics solutions.

About MarketsandMarkets™

MarketsandMarkets™ offers quantified B2B analysis on 30,000 lofty enlarge district of interest alternatives/threats so one can influence the revenues of 70% to eighty% of companies international. MarketsandMarkets™ at the jiffy features 7500 shoppers international including 80% of international Fortune one thousand businesses. essentially 75,000 properly officers across eight industries worldwide strategy MarketsandMarkets™ for his or her ache points round revenues selections.

Contact:Mr. Manoj Singhvimanoj.singhvi@marketsandmarkets.comMarketsandMarkets™ analysis deepest Ltd.Tower B5, office 101, Magarpatta SEZ,Hadapsar, Pune - 411013, IndiaPhone: +1-888-600-6441

View common content:

supply MarketsandMarkets

Copyright (C) 2019 PR Newswire. sum rights reserved

Unquestionably it is difficult assignment to pick dependable certification questions/answers assets regarding review, reputation and validity since individuals bag sham because of picking incorrectly benefit. ensure to serve its customers best to its assets concerning exam dumps update and validity. The vast majority of other's sham report dissension customers arrive to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams joyfully and effortlessly. They never trade off on their review, reputation and attribute on the grounds that killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams customer conviction is imperative to us. Uniquely they deal with review, reputation, sham report objection, trust, validity, report and scam. On the off casual that you notice any groundless report posted by their rivals with the denomination killexams sham report grievance web, sham report, scam, protest or something enjoy this, simply recollect there are constantly poor individuals harming reputation of qualified administrations because of their advantages. There are a huge number of fulfilled clients that pass their exams utilizing brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams hone questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit, their specimen questions and test brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will realize that is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Brain dumps Menu

1Z0-485 braindumps | NAPLEX braindumps | 9L0-205 examcollection | 70-346 drill questions | 9L0-964 drill test | 00M-653 dumps | C2040-416 cram | 700-037 dump | A2040-408 braindumps | ES0-006 mock exam | 9L0-506 questions and answers | DEV-501 real questions | CSM-001 study guide | C9020-970 test prep | NREMT-NRP study guide | HPE2-T34 study guide | 1Y0-203 exam questions | A4040-129 questions answers | 00M-647 exam prep | 000-N31 real questions |

Pass4sure SPS-100 drill Tests with real Questions imply you to must attempt its free demo, you will notice the natural UI and furthermore you will referee that its simple to alter the prep mode. In any case, ensure that, the real SPS-100 exam has a larger number of questions than the sample exam. offers you three months free updates of SPS-100 IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics flat 1 exam questions. Their certification team is constantly accessible at back discontinuance who updates the material as and when required.

If you are attempting to find Pass4sure IBM SPS-100 Dumps containing actual exams questions and answers for the IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics flat 1 Exam instruction, they provide most up to date and attribute wellspring of SPS-100 Dumps this is They gain aggregated a database of SPS-100 Dumps questions from real exams with a selected cease purpose to give you a risk free bag ready and pass SPS-100 exam at the first attempt. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as below;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for sum tests on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $ninety nine
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for sum Orders

If you are scanning for SPS-100 drill Test containing real Test Questions, you are at adjust put. They gain amassed database of inquiries from Actual Exams with a particular ultimate objective to empower you to diagram and pass your exam on the primary endeavor. sum readiness materials on the site are Up To Date and certified by their authorities. give latest and updated drill Test with Actual Exam Questions and Answers for fresh syllabus of IBM SPS-100 Exam. drill their real Questions and Answers to improve your insight and pass your exam with lofty Marks. They ensure your accomplishment in the Test Center, covering each one of the purposes of exam and develop your erudition of the SPS-100 exam. depart with their genuine inquiries.

Our SPS-100 Exam PDF contains Complete Pool of Questions and Answers and Brain dumps verified and certified including references and clarifications (where applicable). Their target to accumulate the Questions and Answers isn't just to pass the exam at first endeavor anyway Really improve Your erudition about the SPS-100 exam focuses.

SPS-100 exam Questions and Answers are Printable in lofty attribute Study sheperd that you can download in your Computer or some other device and start setting up your SPS-100 exam. Print Complete SPS-100 Study Guide, pass on with you when you are at Vacations or Traveling and savor your Exam Prep. You can bag to updated SPS-100 Exam real questions from your online record at whatever point. Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for sum exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for sum Orders

Download your IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics flat 1 Study sheperd in a shimmer ensuing to buying and Start Preparing Your Exam Prep birthright Now!

SPS-100 Practice Test | SPS-100 examcollection | SPS-100 VCE | SPS-100 study guide | SPS-100 practice exam | SPS-100 cram

Killexams HP2-H18 free pdf | Killexams 77-605 study guide | Killexams 1D0-541 cheat sheets | Killexams M8010-238 sample test | Killexams 1Z0-055 examcollection | Killexams HP0-S11 free pdf download | Killexams 000-331 dump | Killexams 000-N15 exam prep | Killexams 1Z0-448 free pdf | Killexams 000-970 braindumps | Killexams 000-303 exam prep | Killexams C2020-701 test questions | Killexams 310-105 real questions | Killexams 000-765 dumps questions | Killexams HP3-R95 bootcamp | Killexams JN0-411 drill test | Killexams 1Z0-493 drill questions | Killexams ICDL-Powerpoint cram | Killexams 000-M228 free pdf | Killexams ACSM-GEI mock exam |

Exam Simulator : Pass4sure SPS-100 VCE Exam Simulator

View Complete list of Brain dumps

Killexams 98-365 questions and answers | Killexams 200-710 drill Test | Killexams 650-669 brain dumps | Killexams HP2-B112 dumps questions | Killexams HP2-N51 free pdf | Killexams 920-327 test prep | Killexams HP0-M28 drill test | Killexams 190-621 mock exam | Killexams ST0-91W brain dumps | Killexams M8010-663 dumps | Killexams A2010-564 examcollection | Killexams EC0-349 test prep | Killexams 642-995 free pdf download | Killexams HP2-E51 pdf download | Killexams HP3-C27 braindumps | Killexams HP2-K19 braindumps | Killexams ST0-10X braindumps | Killexams 251-312 dump | Killexams 1Z0-441 drill test | Killexams HP2-K16 study guide |

IBMSPSSSTATL1P - IBM SPSS Statistics flat 1

Pass 4 confident SPS-100 dumps | SPS-100 real questions |

Experimental crossbreeding reveals strain-specific variation in mortality, growth and personality in the brown trout (Salmo trutta) | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Study fish

Handling and rearing of fish were conducted in accordance with the National Animal Experiment Board’s approval (ESAVI/2458/04.10.03/2011). sum animal experimentation reported meets the ABS/ASAB guidelines for ethical treatment of animals and comply with the current Finnish legislation. The parents of this study fish were obtained from the broodstocks maintained by the Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute (currently the Natural Resources Institute Finland), and represented populations that expose economic or scientific importance in Finland. sum females originated from the River Oulujoki watercourse broodstock (3rd or 4th hatchery generation) that had originally been founded using wild brown trout from Rivers Varisjoki and Kongasjoki, both discharging to the Lake Oulujärvi (Fig. 1). For the veterinary reasons, they were able to expend females only from this population. The females were mated with males from the very strain (also representing 3rd or 4th hatchery generation fish) as well as with males from three other brown trout strains, thus resulting in one control (purebred) F1 group and three hybrid F1 groups (Table 1). The sires of the three hybrid groups originated from the River Vaarainjoki (located next to River Kongasjoki and upstream from River Varisjoki with one lake between, wild-caught individuals, Fig. 1), the Lake Kitkajärvi (1st hatchery generation, strain above the Jyrävä waterfall) and the Rautalampi watercourse (5th or 6th hatchery generation). The Rautalampi hatchery strain represents a collection of several origins of fish (Äyskoski, Tyyrinvirta, Siikakoski and Simunankoski, Fig. 1) and had the longest history of captive breeding in a hatchery. Brown trout from River Vaarainjoki and River Oulujoki watercourse broodstock are moderately genetically differentiated (FST = 0.109 based on 4876 SNP loci, Prokkola et al. submitted MS 2018). Genetic distance (FST) between River Oulujoki watercourse broodstock and Rautalampi hatchery strain is at the flat of 0.073 (M.-L. Koljonen and J. Koskenniemi, unpublished data 2016 based on 16 microsatellite markers). Lake Kitkajärvi strain has not yet been compared to the other included strains. Apart from the resident River Vaarainjoki strain, the other strains were classified migratory. This classification was based on original status of the stocks taken to hatcheries, indirect genetic evidence (large heterogeneity indicates migratory status)43 and experimental evidence between OUV and VAA populations (authors’ unpublished data). They expend the following abbreviations to identify the F1 groups: OUV (River Oulujoki ♂ × River Oulujoki ♀), VAA (River Vaarainjoki ♂ × River Oulujoki ♀), KIT (Lake Kitkajärvi ♂ × River Oulujoki ♀) and RAU (Rautalampi watercourse ♂ × River Oulujoki ♀).

Five females from the River Oulujoki watercourse strain and five males from each of the four strains (20 males in total) were used for fertilizations that were carried out in October 12th in 2011, resulting in 100 female-male combinations (i.e. 25 half-sib families per group). The fertilizations took location at the Kainuu Fisheries Research Station (, where sum the F1 offspring were raised in the very hatchery conditions. Each fertilization combination was divided into three equal replicates (300 incubation units in total, approx. 100 eggs each). The incubation units were open plastic tubes with polystyrene floats and a mesh bottom (100 mm in length and diameter). The incubators were divided into six flow-through tanks (3 m long, 50 incubators per tank) so that OUV and KIT families were always in the very three tanks and KIT and RAU families together in other three tanks. After the first three days, the egg count for the fertilized eggs per each unit was 89 ± 0.85 (mean ± S.D) eggs per unit. The water used in the rearing tanks came from the adjacent Lake Kivesjärvi, and the variations of temperature and oxygen levels during the study followed those in natural conditions.

After the first three days, the incubation units were moved to circular 3.2 m2 tanks (water volume 800 l), where they floated vertically in. Eggs and alevins were incubated in these tanks in three replicates until May 2012. sum eggs hatched by 20th of March 2012. On 21st−23th May in 2012, a total sample of 6300 start-feeding fry was transported to 60 separate rearing tanks (surface district 0.4 m2; water volume during the first two weeks 80 l, then 160 l) for on-growing until the discontinuance of the experiment. The feeding of the fry was furthermore started at this time. The fish were fed ad libitum by automatic belt feeders with commercial parch salmonid food (Biomar INICIO plus G; 0.4–1.1 mm). The offspring of males from the OUV and VAA strains were placed in 50 tanks in full-sib families consisting of 105 individuals/family. The families were formed by selecting the very number of individuals from each of the three egg incubation replicates for further rearing, if practicable (35 fish/repetition in sum but two cases). For logistic constrains, the half-sib families of males from KIT and RAU strains were placed together in 10 tanks so that in each tank there were 105 individuals that shared the very manful parent but not the very female parent. These half-sib families were furthermore formed by taking the very number of individuals from each female-male fertilization replicate (7 fish repetition−1 in sum cases). As a result of these combinations, 25 tanks were formed for both OUV and VAA full-sib families, and 5 tanks for both KIT and RAU half-sib families. Behavioral experiments were performed for five individuals from each of these 60 rearing tanks (for 300 individuals in total, notice below).

Mortality of the offspring

The mortality of the F1 offspring was monitored every few days during the egg incubation and hatching age (from fertilization on 12th October 2011 until 21th May 2012) and then daily during the age of on-growing (from 24th May 2012 until 6th September 2012). Both departed eggs and fry were counted and removed.

Body length measurements

The first body length measurements were performed between 25th May–1st June 2012. After transporting 6300 start-feeding fry into rearing tanks for on-growing and behavioral experiments, 1180 of the fry remaining in the incubation tubes were measured for total body length (29.5 ± 1.2 mm, mean ± S.D). Four individuals from each of the 300 incubation tubes were haphazardly selected for the measurement, except for the six cases where there were less than four “surplus” individuals remaining after the transport (in these cases 0–3 individuals were measured). Since sum the incubation tubes having less than four surplus individuals belonged to VAA test group, slightly smaller sample sizes for VAA test group was used (280 measured individuals from VAA group and 300 from each of the other three test groups). The fish sizes were measured in a rotating order, so that four individuals from 25 OUV tubes were measured first, then the very number from KIT tubes, RAU tubes and finally from VAA tubes.

The second body length measurements took location approximately one month later, between 27th June and 20th July 2012, when 300 individuals (48.0 ± 5.7 mm, mean ± S.D), five individuals/tank, were measured as a Part of the behavioral assays. Haphazard netting of the study fish according to a randomized order of the rearing tanks (families) was used to select the individuals for behavioral trials and subsequent measurements. However, the order of the rearing tanks was randomized in a way that both OUV and VAA individuals were tested and measured first (27th June to 19th July), whereas individuals from KIT and RAU hybrid populations were tested and measured during the last four days of the experiments (between 17th and 20th July 2012). OUV and VAA groups were prioritized to secure the quantitative genetic parameter estimations in the case of any disease epidemics. The measurement order thus resulted in greater body length and weight values for KIT and RAU crossing groups, and this color was accounted for in the analyses and interpretation of the results.

Third measurement age took location in 3rd–4th September in 2012. At this time, 1113 individuals remaining in the rearing tanks were measured for their body lengths (77.4 ± 8.2 mm, mean ± S.D). This measurement group consisted of 450 offspring of OUV and VAA males, 108 offspring of KIT males and 103 offspring of RAU males.

Quantification of behavioral traits and personality

The behavioral trials quantifying individuals’ boldness and exploration drift were performed between 27th June and 20th July 2012. Five haphazardly dipnetted individuals from each of the 60 full-sib or half-sib families were included in the experiment (300 individuals in total: 125 individuals from OUV and VAA groups and 25 individuals from KIT and RAU groups). The study fish were deprived of food for approximately 36 hours before the experiment individually in miniature acclimation tanks (140 × 120 mm, water depth approx. 50 mm).

In the personality assay, the study fish were placed one at a time in a specially made emergence test tank (see details in39), that consisted of a darker-walled starting compartment, i.e. box, (separated from the ease of the tank by a door that could live lifted from a distance by pulling a line) and a larger, lighter-walled test arena (with uniform light gray floor). On the bottom of the test arena, two drawn lines allowed us to evaluate the time that it took for the study fish to swim further into the arena (to cross the first and the second line). To measure the boldness and exploration drift of the study fish, the test tank included two rocks for retreat and a mirror covering the discontinuance wall of the arena. At the dawn of the trial, the study fish were placed in the starting compartment, where they were allowed to acclimate to the circumstances for three minutes. After the acclimation period, the door of the starting compartment was lifted, allowing the fish to swim into the test arena. They used software assisted timing (custom software by A.V.) to record the time it took for the fish to activate (move for the first time in the starting compartment), leave the starting compartment, swim over the lines in the arena and handle the mirror at the other end. They furthermore recorded if the fish swam back to the starting compartment, touched the mirror for more than one time or exhibited freezing deportment (stayed motionless for more than one second, as indication of dread or stress39. The duration of the experiment was eight minutes from the jiffy the door of the starting compartment was lifted.

As expected, not sum study fish performed sum of the behaviors described above during the test period. To forestall any color in the data, it was primary to comprise these individuals in statistical analysis. Therefore, when a value was missing for any behavioral variable, a maximum value was used (the duration of a trial, 8 min). For example, if an individual never activated during the trial, it was given the maximum value (8 min) for activation and sum practicable further behaviors (entering the test arena, crossing the first and second line in the arena and touching the mirror at the other end). Maximum values were used because they represented the actual deportment of more passive study individuals better than not giving them any values, in which case the study group would gain seemed, on average, more active and/or bold than in reality.

The behavioral affliction was performed twice for each tested individual to enable the evaluation of short term repeatability of behavior39. Both trials were always performed on the very day, with at least three hours in between the affliction times to recover from practicable stress caused by the first affliction (recovery time 258.01 ± 38.79 min, mean ± S.D). After the trials the study fish were euthanatized using an overdose of anesthetic (clove oil, 500 mg l−1) and their lengths and weights were measured.

Statistical analysis Mortality

Mortality was analyzed separately for the egg incubation-alevin age and for the age of on-growing (from start-feeding onwards). Since the number of fertilized eggs per family varied slightly in the dawn of the experiment (mean ± S.D. = 89.3 ± 14.8, sweep 40–143), arcsine square root transformed proportions of departed eggs were used in the analysis. The number of fish in each half-sib family was equalized when the alevins were transported to the rearing tanks (105 individuals per tank). However, due to a screen in a faucet, 58 individuals died in one of the rearing tanks. To comprise this tank in the data, arcsine square-root transformed proportions of mortality were furthermore used in the analysis of this age (deaths caused by the screen were not included in the mortality data). The mortalities during both periods were analyzed using a linear mixed consequence model using restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML) in SAS 9.4. software (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The significance of different random effects in the models (e.g. incubation tank or manful identity, nested within manful strain, or interaction between female and manful strain) was separately tested by comparing the goodness of appropriate of the alternative models either containing or missing the consequence (likelihood ratio test with one degree of freedom)47. Further, the commandeer oversight structures were chosen for the models based on the values of Akaike’s Information Criteria (AIC). Insignificant (co)variances were excluded from the final models. For the first (egg-alevin) period, the model was:

$${y}_{ijkl}={\mu }+{\rm{male}}\,{{\rm{strain}}}_{j}+{{\rm{female}}}_{k}+{{\rm{male}}}_{l(j)}+{e}_{ijkl},$$

where yijkl is the arcsin square root transformed mortality within an incubator i, µ is the model intercept (overall population mean), manful strainj is the fixed consequence of manful strain (j = 1–4), femalek is the random consequence of female parent (k = 1–5), malel(j) is the random consequence of manful parent (l = 1–20), nested within manful strain, and eijkl is the random oversight term.

For the second (on-growing) age the model was:

$${y}_{ij}={\mu }+{\rm{male}}\,{{\rm{strain}}}_{j}+{e}_{ij}$$

where yijm is the arcsin square root transformed mortality within a rearing tank i (i = 1–60 tanks). Tukey-Kramer -type post hoc tests were used to identify pairwise differences among the four manful strains.

Body length measurements

Body length differences among the manful strains were tested separately at the three different measurement periods (period 1: 1180 fry measured between 25th May–1st June 2012, age 2: 300 fingerlings measured between 27th June–20th July 2012 and age 3: 1113 individuals measured between 3th–4th September 2012). For the first period, the linear mixed consequence model was:

$${y}_{ijklm}={\mu }+{\rm{male}}\,{{\rm{strain}}}_{j}+{{\rm{day}}}_{m}+{{\rm{female}}}_{k}+{{\rm{male}}}_{l(j)}+{e}_{ijklm},$$

where yijklm is the body length of an individual i. Residual covariances among individual fish were estimated for each incubation tank separately. Further, because the first measurement age lasted for 9 days the day of measurement (calculated since the dawn of the measurement age in question) was included in the model as a fixed covariate.

For the second and third periods, the linear mixed model was of form:

$${y}_{ijklm}={\mu }+{\rm{male}}\,{{\rm{strain}}}_{j}+{{\rm{day}}}_{m}+{{\rm{tank}}}_{n(j)}+{e}_{ijklm},$$

where tankn(j) is the random rearing tank consequence (n = 1–60), nested within manful strain. It is noteworthy here that KIT and RAU fish were kept in paternal half-sib tanks, and consequently in these two groups the tank consequence on fish growth may live partially confounded with maternal identity effect. The date of measurement (m = 1–23 days) was included as a fixed covariate for the model of the second length data only. separate residual variances were estimated for each manful strain. Tukey-Kramer pairwise comparisons were used to find which manful strains differed from one another.

Behavioral data

The assumption on simple distribution of residuals was tested using one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Since the normality of some variables was improved by logarithm transformation, Ln-transformation was used for sum variables (Ln(X + 1) was used for number of times mirror touched, number of times frozen and freezing time). The repeatability of individual behavioral variables was analyzed using the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)48 prior to inclusion in PCA, since analyzing the heritability of a non-repeatable deportment would not live reasonable49.

Principal component analysis (PCA; IBM SPSS Statistics) with varimax rotation was used to combine multiple behavioral variables into uncorrelated principal components (PC), as this approach has been adopted in recent personality studies in fish39, which allows us to compare the results with earlier studies. The variables included in PCA were (1) entering the arena, (2) crossing the first and (3) second line in the arena, (4) touching the mirror (for the first time during trial), (5) number of times the mirror was touched during the trial, (6) time spent in the starting compartment, (7) number of times the individual showed freezing deportment and (8) total time expend freezing during the trial. Behavioral data from sum groups was included in the very principal component analysis.

The genetic parameters for the two obtained PCs were analyzed using REML estimation in ASReml 3.0 software50. Because the identity of both manful and female parents were only known for OUV (control) and VAA crossing groups, the data from only these two groups were used for the genetic models. Due to a relatively low number of families (and low number of tested offspring per family) within the groups (125 fish per strain), the genetic models were race for a combined data including both groups together. Estimation of common genetic variances for the two crossing groups is justified as these groups are not genetically independent, separate populations but share the very mothers. The variance components for each PC were estimated using a repeated measures animal model, which can live written in matrix notation as:



where y is the vector of individual PC scores, b is the vector of fixed effects, a is the vector of random additive genetic effects, p is the vector of random permanent environment effects and e is the vector of random residual effects. The X is the design matrix associated with b, and Za and Zb are incidence matrices assigning observations to the levels of additive genetic effects and permanent environment effects (i.e., non-additive contributions to fixed among-individual differences), respectively. Random variables a, p and e were assumed to live normally distributed. Specifically, \({\bf{a}} \sim N(0,\,{\bf{A}}{\sigma }_{a}^{2})\), where \({\sigma }_{a}^{2}\) is the additive genetic variance and \({\bf{A}}\) is the additive genetic relationship matrix derived from the parental generation; \({\bf{p}} \sim N(0,\,{\bf{I}}{\sigma }_{pe}^{2})\), where \({\sigma }_{pe}^{2}\) is the common environment variance; \(e \sim N(0,\,{\bf{I}}{\sigma }_{e}^{2})\), where \({\sigma }_{e}^{2}\) is the residual variance and \({\bf{I}}\) is the identity matrix.

Further, the significance of an additional variance due to random rearing tank of individuals was furthermore tested using the likelihood ratio test47.

Conditional Wald statistics was used to evaluate the significance of the fixed effects. Only the variables with significant contribution to the variation of behavioral PCs were included in the final models (P < 0.05). For both behavioral PCs, the confounding effects of water temperature and testing time (in minutes from 00:00) were fitted in the model as fixed covariates. For PC1 (exploratory tendency), the fixed effects furthermore included the number of testing day (0–22) whereas for PC2 (freezing) fish body length was included.

The repeatability (r) of both behavioral PCs was calculated as:

$$r=\frac{{\sigma }_{a}^{2}+{\sigma }_{pe}^{2}}{{\sigma }_{a}^{2}+{\sigma }_{pe}^{2}+{\sigma }_{e}^{2}}$$


Correspondingly, heritability (h2) and permanent environment consequence ratio (p2) were calculated for each PC as:

$${h}^{2}=\frac{{\sigma }_{a}^{2}}{{\sigma }_{a}^{2}+{\sigma }_{pe}^{2}+{\sigma }_{e}^{2}}\,{\rm{and}}\,{p}^{2}=\frac{{\sigma }_{pe}^{2}}{{\sigma }_{a}^{2}+{\sigma }_{pe}^{2}+{\sigma }_{e}^{2}},\,{\rm{respectively}}{\rm{.}}$$


Approximate measure errors were calculated for estimated variance components and variance ratios using ASReml.

We tested for differences in group means in individual additive genetic solutions (i.e., best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) of breeding values obtained from ASReml) for both PCs using a linear mixed model in SAS (group as a fixed effect). Similarly, the disagreement of means in individual permanent environment consequence solutions was tested between OUV and VAA groups.

To analyze whether there were differences among the four F1 groups in the two behavioral PCs, linear mixed consequence (LME) models were fitted to the data in SPSS 23.0.02 (IBM Corp, USA). Environmental variables that might gain had an consequence on the behaviors were included in the model. The variables included were water temperature and oxygen flat (measured daily), repetition (1st or 2nd trial), size of the fish (measured as body length at the day of the behavioral trial), time of the affliction (as minutes from 00:00 am), and recovery time between the trials (as minutes). Date was controlled by including strongly correlated water temperature as a covariate (Pearson’s r = 0.88, p = 0.01) and testing the day consequence separately by adding it to the final model. Neither tank consequence nor maternal effects could live independently included in the model. This was because each tank contained offspring from just one manful parent (and from just one female parent in the case of OUV and VAA offspring). Since the offspring of both KIT and RAU sires were combined into half-sib families, the identity of the female parent was not known for these groups. Thus, the rearing tank identity, nested within manful strain was included in the model as a random consequence to control for the dependency arising from the common rearing environment. Bonferroni -type post hoc tests were used for pairwise comparisons of the four F1 groups. Model residuals were inspected for normality and establish to meet the model assumptions.

Unfriendly Skies: Predicting Flight Cancellations Using Weather Data, Part 2 | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

Ricardo Balduino and Tim Bohn

Early Flight, Creative Commons Introduction

As they described in Part 1 of this series, their objective is to attend predict the probability of the cancellation of a flight between two of the ten U.S. airports most affected by weather conditions. They expend historical flights data and historical weather data to discharge predictions for upcoming flights.

Over the course of this four-part series, they expend different platforms to attend us with those predictions. Here in Part 2, they expend the IBM SPSS Modeler and APIs from The Weather Company.

Tools used in this expend case solution

IBM SPSS Modeler is designed to attend discover patterns and trends in structured and unstructured data with an intuitive visual interface supported by advanced analytics. It provides a sweep of advanced algorithms and analysis techniques, including text analytics, entity analytics, decision management and optimization to deliver insights in near real-time. For this expend case, they used SPSS Modeler 18.1 to create a visual representation of the solution, or in SPSS terms, a stream. That’s right — not one line of code was written in the making of this blog.

We furthermore used The Weather Company APIs to retrieve historical weather data for the ten airports over the year 2016. IBM SPSS Modeler supports calling the weather APIs from within a stream. That is accomplished by adding extensions to SPSS, available in the IBM SPSS Predictive Analytics resources page, a.k.a. Extensions Hub.

A proposed solution

In this blog, they submit one practicable solution for this problem. It’s not meant to live the only or the best practicable solution, or a production-level solution for that matter, but the discussion presented here covers the typical iterative process (described in the sections below) that helps us accumulate insights and refine the predictive model across iterations. They embolden the readers to try and arrive up with different solutions, and provide us with your feedback for future blogs.

Business and data understanding

The first step of the iterative process includes understanding and gathering the data needed to train and test their model later.

Flights data — We gathered 2016 flights data from the US Bureau of Transportation Statistics website. The website allows us to export one month at a time, so they ended up with 12 csv (comma separated value) files. They used IBM SPSS Modeler to merge sum the csv files into one set and to select the ten airports in their scope. Some data clean-up and formatting was done to validate dates and hours for each flight, as seen in motif 1.

Figure 1 — gathering and preparing flights data in IBM SPSS Modeler

Weather data — From the Extensions Hub, they added the TWCHistoricalGridded extension to SPSS Modeler, which made the extension available as a node in the tool. That node took a csv file listing the 10 airports latitude and longitude coordinates as input, and generated the historical hourly data for the entire year of 2016, for each airport location, as seen in motif 2.

Figure 2 — gathering and preparing weather data in IBM SPSS Modeler

Combined flights and weather data — To each flight in the first data set, they added two fresh columns: root and DEST, containing the respective airport codes. Next, flight data and the weather data were merged together. Note: the “stars” or SPSS super nodes in motif 3 are placeholders for the diagrams in Figures 1 and 2 above.

Figure 3 — combining flights and weather data in IBM SPSS Modeler Data preparation, modeling, and evaluation

We iteratively performed the following steps until the desired model qualities were reached:

· Prepare data

· discharge modeling

· Evaluate the model

· Repeat

Figure 4 shows the first and second iterations of their process in IBM SPSS Modeler.

Figure 4 — iterations: prepare data, race models, evaluate — and carryout it again First iteration

To start preparing the data, they used the combined flights and weather data from the previous step and performed some data cleanup (e.g. took care of null values). In order to better train the model later on, they filtered out rows where flight cancellations were not related to weather conditions (e.g. cancellations due to technical issues, security issues, etc.)

Figure 5 — imbalanced data establish in their input data set

This is an arresting expend case, and often a difficult one to solve, due to the imbalanced data it presents, as seen in motif 5. By “imbalanced” they beimportant that there were far more non-cancelled flights in the historical data than cancelled ones. They will dispute how they dealt with imbalanced data in the following iteration.

Next, they defined which features were required as inputs to the model (such as flight date, hour, day of the week, root and destination airport codes, and weather conditions), and which one was the target to live generated by the model (i.e. predict the cancellation status). They then partitioned the data into training and testing sets, using an 85/15 ratio.

The partitioned data was fed into an SPSS node called Auto Classifier. This node allowed us to race multiple models at once and preview their outputs, such as the district under the ROC curve, as seen in motif 6.

Figure 6 — models output provided by the Auto Classifier node

That was a useful step in making an initial selection of a model for further refinement during subsequent iterations. They decided to expend the Random Trees model since the initial analysis showed it has the best district under the curve as compared to the other models in the list.

Second iteration

During the second iteration, they addressed the skewedness of the original data. For that purpose, they chose one of the SPSS nodes called SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique). This node provides an advanced over-sampling algorithm that deals with imbalanced datasets, which helped their selected model work more effectively.

Figure 7 — distribution of cancelled and non-cancelled flights after using SMOTE

In motif 7, they notice a more balanced distribution between cancelled and non-cancelled flights after running the data through SMOTE.

As mentioned earlier, they picked the Random Trees model for this sample solution. This SPSS node provides a model for tree-based classification and prediction that is built on Classification and Regression Tree methodology. Due to its characteristics, this model is much less supine to overfitting, which gives a higher likelihood of repeating the very test results when you expend fresh data, that is, data that was not Part of the original training and testing data sets. Another advantage of this method — in particular for their expend case — is its talent to manipulate imbalanced data.

Since in this expend case they are dealing with classification analysis, they used two common ways to evaluate the performance of the model: confusion matrix and ROC curve. One of the outputs of running the Random Trees model in SPSS is the confusion matrix seen in motif 8. The table shows the precision achieved by the model during training.

Figure 8 — Confusion Matrix for cancelled vs. non-cancelled flights

In this case, the model’s precision was about 95% for predicting cancelled flights (true positives), and about 94% for predicting non-cancelled flights (true negatives). That means, the model was reform most of the time, but furthermore made wrong predictions about 4–5% of the time (false negatives and groundless positives).

That was the precision given by the model using the training data set. This is furthermore represented by the ROC curve on the left side of motif 9. They can see, however, that the district under the curve for the training data set was better than the district under the curve for the testing data set (right side of motif 9), which means that during testing, the model did not discharge as well as during training (i.e. it presented a higher rate of errors, or higher rate of groundless negatives and groundless positives).

Figure 9 — ROC curves for the training and testing data sets

Nevertheless, they decided that the results were quiet qualified for the purposes of their discussion in this blog, and they stopped their iterations here. They embolden readers to further refine this model or even to expend other models that could decipher this expend case.

Deploying the model

Finally, they deployed the model as a ease API that developers can summon from their applications. For that, they created a “deployment branch” in the SPSS stream. Then, they used the IBM Watson Machine Learning service available on IBM Bluemix here. They imported the SPSS stream into the Bluemix service, which generated a scoring endpoint (or URL) that application developers can call. Developers can furthermore summon The Weather Company APIs directly from their application code to retrieve the forecast data for the next day, week, and so on, in order to pass the required data to the scoring endpoint and discharge the prediction.

A typical scoring endpoint provided by the Watson Machine Learning service would spy enjoy the URL shown below.<provided by WML service>

By passing the expected JSON body that includes the required inputs for scoring (such as the future flight data and forecast weather data), the scoring endpoint above returns if a given flight is likely to live cancelled or not. This is seen in motif 10, which shows a summon being made to the scoring endpoint — and its response — using an HTTP requester appliance available in a web browser.

Figure 10 — actual request URL, JSON body, and response from scoring endpoint

Notice in the JSON response above that the deployed model predicted this particular flight from Newark to Chicago would live 88.8% likely to live cancelled, based on forecast weather conditions.


IBM SPSS Modeler is a powerful appliance that helped us visually create a solution for this expend case without writing a unique line of code. They were able to succeed an iterative process that helped us understand and prepare the data, then model and evaluate the solution, to finally deploy the model as an API for consumption by application developers.


The IBM SPSS stream and data used as the basis for this blog are available on GitHub. There you can furthermore find instructions on how to download IBM SPSS Modeler, bag a key for The Weather Channel APIs, and much more.

A simple Play On Self-Service roomy Data Prep And Analytics: Wait For Smarter Valuation Entry Point | real questions and Pass4sure dumps

No result found, try fresh keyword!We would wait for a more attractive valuation flat to initiate positions ... open source statistical programming language R (which is supported by Alteryx), IBM SPSS Statistics, the SAS programming l...

Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [101 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [43 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
CyberArk [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [752 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1533 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [65 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [375 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [282 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [135 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

References :

Dropmark :
Wordpress :
Dropmark-Text :
Blogspot :
RSS Feed : : :

Back to Main Page | |